What? Im so glad shes in last place as this is awful proposed legislature. Not only will it eliminate people from putting food on their tables and clothes on their families back, but now every person in America will have to pay a "pollution" tax? Senseless. She does know that the government itself doesnt even use a fleet of 100% green vehicles and have buildings running only on nonrenewable energy.
You shouldn't pretend to be worried about people not having food on their tables or clothes on their families' back when you seem to be against it as well.
The cases that gain attention nationally run the gamut as far the pertinent details go. The onus is also on prosecutors to bring appropriate charges if they feel criminal behavior has occurred. Not every case is going to result in officers being convicted of murder, nor should it.
>implying that every question and questioner hasn't already been vetted by officials from both parties before CNN even gets to talk to them
Not saying every case should be, but a lot of cases should. I mean, six shots to a guy running away warrants a guilty charge as opposed to shooting a guy who pulled out a gun.
our nations forefathers would be offended by the current happenings in the election, our countrry should be city shining on the hill with christian values, these are not christian values
Christian values such as looking at nonwhites as lower than human and deserving to be slaves? Christian values such as being against homosexuality? Christian values such as divorce being a bad thing, but people still getting divorced?
Christian values are bad, and it's embarrassing that people defend it, make it look out to be better than Muslim values, and/or claim this country is a Christian country. Christian values, Muslim values, Catholic values, whatever values have you, are all bad.
I think her problem was that she knew she should not answer him on those ones.
She knew if she gets into his game she would lose. Judging whether what he says is so outragously wrong that she has to get into it or rather just ignore him is hard.
If i were her, i think i would have said something more about him attacking bill. If she had gone so 'wife giving a heartfelt explanation about overcoming marital problems' route, it might have garnered her a lot of points.
In the end, it depends whether the undecided voters care about policy.
After all, benghazi is something that anyone who is interested can read up. People who hate her for it won't stop, and the rest has already heard of it by now. I don't think it sticks a lot.
And about Bill: The fun thing is that he was there. He sat in the audience, he was greeted by the trump family. I don't think it looked like trump's family or anyone there ACTUALLY thinks bill clinton is a rapist.
And that picture is important.
It'd have gotten her points with her genuine supporters, but I doubt it'd have done much out of that. Hillary's reputation is that of a wife who let her husband get away with abusing women and shaming the accusers; most people would probably counter that overcoming marital problems route with her staying with Bill for political reasons and letting him get away with crimes and all.
I don't know, maybe it's just courtesy. Probably sure Bill and Trump want to fuck Ivanka though, but tbh, who doesn't?
Oh,paul ryan won't be defending trump anymore. He has not yet withdrawn his support but after having said that he might as well. Apparently even trump's brely adequate debate performance was not enough to salvage him. Too bad that even this would save ryan's integrity, if he had any he would have simply not ever endorsed a guy who clearly is at odds with him (Well, not in everything but the 10% in which they disagree should have been enough anyways).
Ryan won't withdraw his endorsement because Trump is a republican, and Ryan would rather have a shitty republican in office than a slightly less shitty democrat. It doesn't matter if Ryan won't ever defend Trump and will criticize him, he's still endorsing him, and that says a lot.
