So, opinions about illegal immigration should come from illegal immigrants?
So, opinions about illegal immigration should come from illegal immigrants?
Terrible, but who exactly did you expect to be doing jobs involving manual labor with construction/extraction?Illegal immigrant labor was used to cleanup World Trade Center rubble post 9.11.2001
I'm curious what you think that is a symptom of?Retailers in the USA have been caught paying illegal immigrants less than $4 an hour to clean their stores
Worthwhile is a awkward way to put it, it's almost like you're only treating this issue as if immigrant labor is a commodity. Why is that?Open immigration was worthwhile when america had railroads to build, when construction was booming and there were many jobs to fill
Yes, because covid has eliminated jobs on farms and in other processing industries, right?Now that america has no jobs for illegal immigrants, open immigration is not as sound a policy
I'm confused. Which Central American country is attempting to wage economic warfare on us? Or are you saying we're taking in illegal immigrants in an effort to wage economic warfare on Mexico or Canada?Open borders is a military tactic post 2000 with nations like turkey threatening to flood thousands of illegal immigrants into other countries as a form of economic warfare

Poor to middle class is a pretty extreme swath. If we're talking about extreme poverty, there are people who go long stretches without meaningful nutrition, lack access to clean drinking water, etc. Compare that to people who would be considered "rich" in most third world countries - owns property, a car, has a stable income etc. A distinction is still needed.Heh. Well.
Approximately 99.9% of the world's population are poor to middle class.
For 99.9% of everyone alive to feel oppressed or treated unfairly by a tiny 0.01% sliver of the population.
They would have to be spectacularly uninformed and unorganized.
Embarrassingly so.
Would that be fair to say?
![]()
Obama and Biden were just as tough on undocumented immigrants, so I don't know why the right cry about them allowing "illegal immigrants." The way it's easy for the right to lie, be wrong, and still have their voters' trust.How tough were Obama and Biden on illegal immigrants 2008-2016?
Everyone that wants to discuss illegal immigration knows as much about it, as virgins do about sex.
Would anyone here take sex advice from virgins?
![]()
Basically, what I get are the following:Preferably from those who know the following.
- Illegal immigrant labor was used to cleanup World Trade Center rubble post 9.11.2001
- Retailers in the USA have been caught paying illegal immigrants less than $4 an hour to clean their stores
- Open immigration was worthwhile when america had railroads to build, when construction was booming and there were many jobs to fill
- Now that america has no jobs for illegal immigrants, open immigration is not as sound a policy
- Open borders is a military tactic post 2000 with nations like turkey threatening to flood thousands of illegal immigrants into other countries as a form of economic warfare
Someone would have to know most, if not all of these, just to get the basics down.
(This is the short list)
Not only the obvious points but the less obvious ones that can be inferred.
...
edit
![]()
Turkey's Erdogan threatens to release millions of refugees into Europe over criticism of Syria offensive
"We will open the gates and send 3.6 million refugees your way," Erdogan says in a speech.www.cnbc.com
Illegal immigrants are used as pawns and a form of warfare. ^
Wrong. It's mainly the conservatives know nothing about illegal immigration. This has been proven many times over and over.
Undocumented immigrants are among the hardest workers
Undocumented immigrants were exploited by the horrible Americans, who treated them as less than human beings, even though these immigrants basically helped build USA as we know it now (railroad).

No one says all whites owned slaves. Acting like people say that is a misrepresentation at best, and intellectual dishonesty at worst.The woke campaign says: "all whites owned slaves".
In reality, only super rich plantation owners used slave labor to work their fields.
The wealthy should be blamed for slavery in the USA. Instead "all white people" are blamed.
Maybe you can figure out why.
...
The way things are going, Richard Dawkins could legit be awarded a nobel peace prize in 2022.![]()
Revealed: How atheist Richard Dawkins' family fortune came from the slave trade
Ancestors of secularist campaigner, Richard Dawkins, made their fortune from the slave trade, it has been revealed.www.dailymail.co.uk
![]()
No one says all whites owned slaves. Acting like people say that is a misrepresentation at best, and intellectual dishonesty at worst.
There's no shortage of blame for slavery in the USA, even a small percentage of indigenous people owned slaves. To characterize the slave trade as an exclusively rich man's trade is revisionist history. Around 25% of Southerners owned slaves. In 1860 in the states that had not yet outlawed slavery, anywhere from 3% (Delaware) to 50% (Mississippi) of families in said states owned slaves.
What some might say is that most whites played a part in reinforcing white supremacy during the antebellum period and Jim Crow era, and even after the civil rights movements in the 60s there's still structures in place that are relics from this earlier time period. This is obviously not the same thing as saying "all whites owned slaves", but it seems you're yet again struggling with nuance here.


--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Slavery actually still exists, but in a form of "prison labor." I think that's the major reason why so many Black men are incarcerated.
Slavery was not exclusive to the South, it was just the last place that practiced it. Of course it was more popular and far more vital to the South due to their lack of a fall line and limited industrialization as a result. Even still, 20% of the population in Southern cities were slaves. There are no plantations in cities. To characterize the issue as only being about wealth is missing the point. Yes, of course the most wealthy will exploit something like slavery on a far greater scale though, is that what you're getting at? Because I have no argument against that obviously. This doesn't change the fact that there were plenty of average people who owned slaves just because they could.When most speak of american slavery. They're referring to unpaid manual labor. Under inhumane and cruel conditions. Exclusively an area dominated by wealthy plantation owners.
The broader scope of "slavery" which you are referring to involve slaves being paid wages. Working under far more humanitarian conditions in contrast to the woke angle celebrities like Spike Lee, Nathan Phillips, Jussie Smollett and Colin Kaepernick push.
But what you're really missing is... what percentage of states like mississippi were composed of plantations owned by the wealthy. If half of mississippi was composed of plantation land, wouldn't it make sense that 50% of the state would be slave owners? Which says nothing about which income demographic owned them.
Higher education gender and race studies push "all whites are racist" narratives. Which are often funded by big tech. There are many articles and journalistic pieces published on this.
Most screaming about amazon, google, facebook and twitter being evil.
Are repeating talking points & studies funded by those corporations on racism in the country.
Ironic don't you think?
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Slavery was not exclusive to the South, it was just the last place that practiced it. Of course it was more popular and far more vital to the South due to their lack of a fall line and limited industrialization as a result. Even still, 20% of the population in Southern cities were slaves. There are no plantations in cities. To characterize the issue as only being about wealth is missing the point. Yes, of course the most wealthy will exploit something like slavery on a far greater scale though, is that what you're getting at? Because I have no argument against that obviously. This doesn't change the fact that there were plenty of average people who owned slaves just because they could.
Slaves being paid wages...? If you want to talk about indentured servitude or something then do so by all means. But don't act like it was much better and absent of the same sort of ugliness. Wtf does Smollet or Kaepernick have to do with slavery?
If you think the majority of current gender and race studies exist to paint all whites as racist, what do you think "big tech" is hoping to accomplish by funding it? I'm dying to know.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
It's always interesting how the examination of the history and/or sociology surrounding race or gender seems to only come down to "all whites are racist" for some people. I wonder why that is?
Imo, you need to wait 6 months at least to start criticizing a new president. Don't jump the gun just yet. It's okay to criticize just be rational.It seems Biden isn't sticking to any of his campaign promises.
But no one here is unhappy about it.
![]()
for the record, although I may say otherwise, I don't think all white people are racist.It's always interesting how the examination of the history and/or sociology surrounding race or gender seems to only come down to "all whites are racist" for some people. I wonder why that is?
Same. And I'm a black man living in the south. This is something I've never heard any other black person say, ever. EVER. We don't even say all policemen are racist. The only people that I ever hear making this assertion is conservative youtubers claiming to understand what people on the left believe. Which is dangerous because that's where a lot of people get their ideas about the other side from.for the record, although I may say otherwise, I don't think all white people are racist.
"Filled with"? You're being hyperbolic, lol. Your anecdotes are the exception that proves the rule. If I wanted to I could find anti-natalists that think giving birth to children is immoral. I could find black people that think life as slaves kept us from acting on our genetically intrinsic need to commit violence. I can find people that believe there's a being in the sky that can hear your thoughts and cares about who you have sex with. Doesn't mean that any of the people in these examples represent everyone in that group.The internet is filled with Blacks who thinks all whites are racist, Not long ago, A video in UK went viral of blacks asking whites to kiss their feet to prove that they are not racist, and i have read an article made by black pulbisher saying whites should not marry with whites because it count as incest since whites look like eacother and they only wants to pass their white supremacy genes. There are many things like that and i have personally dealt with it. So the notion that blacks don't think all whites are racist is just wrong. Maybe only few blacks have this mentality but yeah it exists.
This is none sense my dude, I wasn't being hyperbolic.Filled with"? You're being hyperbolic, lol. Your anecdotes are the exception that proves the rule. If I wanted to I could find anti-natalists that think giving birth to children is immoral. I could find black people that think life as slaves kept us from acting on our genetically intrinsic need to commit violence. I can find people that believe there's a being in the sky that can hear your thoughts and cares about who you have sex with.
This is something I've never heard any other black person say, ever. EVER. We don't even say all policemen are racist
ofc. but then again you talked like all blacks never had this thought in consideration which is false. You sound like someone who talks in the behave of all black people. I just wanted to point out there are bad apples.Doesn't mean that any of the people in these examples represent everyone in that group.