- Joined
- Jul 31, 2016
- Messages
- 3,811
- Reaction score
- 4,622
- Country
-
I'm saying humans are diverse and the subject of development through experience(including the emotional and cultural kind). If you insist with this "teenagers are stupid" statement it's cause that is your own opinion, not mine. I'm intelligent enough to both acknowledge and embrace diversity as well as not insult myself, given that even I was once a teenager as well as many people I used to or still respect and admireSo you're not saying teenagers are stupid, you're just saying teenagers are stupid. And sure, different cultures have different kinds of storytelling, but there are universal ruley that any narrative needs to follow.
While King and Diane could interact with their surroundings, this is clearly a simulation based on Dolor and Gloxinia's memories. They weren't actually immersed into the events as evidenced by the fact that they are laying comatose on the ground right now and clearly can't alter history, because if they could, whatever horrible things happened to Dolor and Gloxinia should they should have been able to undo rather easily.
See above.
. It's a no brainer.It being a mere "simulation" is still a speculation, and whether your perspective or my opinion (of this being an act of temporal and metaphysical transcendence) turns out to be true, mine is still more closely related to the "supernatural" and "fantasy" domains admitted for this story, rather than something pertaining more to the real, tangible world or futuristic sci-fi. The characters are casting spells activated by magic words even when they're connecting separate dimensions or invading someone's mind, not using high end gadgets, intricate psychology, complex bio-chemical serums or mere "brain-waves". If you still want to pursue this contradiction, I suggest you 1st double-check with the obviously old-school Nakaba who publicly admitted to basing his work on standard folklore rather than more contemporary beliefs and teachings where the esoteric meets the empiric that have lead to works of fiction like Assassin's Creed,The Matrix and Inception. Ask him if it's a mere simulation or closer to an "out-of-body" experience or simply wait for the completion of the arc to cast strong judgement.
Immersion still occurs, whether it is a simulation or supernatural transcendence. We're discussing the abstract aspect only involving the psyche or soul. And for all the canon evidence we have, King is in Gloxinia's body and is experiencing the physical difference to his predecessor, while Diane is literally getting the chance to see how it feels to be a (giant) man.
And the story-telling process here is so far completely normal and rule abiding since it uses this metaphysical phenomenon for introducing King and Diane to the past arc and more personal development by offering a "story within a story".
I'm partly disinclined to take your reply seriously given that you're bringing up arguments which crumble with?
FMA, Naruto (which I don't like but anyway), SnK, HxH, all of these are shonen that display complexity and mature content, and which did/do fine with the selling part of the product.
The main problem I, at least, have against Taizai is that it never develops its good possibilities and always go the easy route. Just pointing out a few exemples, there's way too many for my taste :
1) Nabaka had the possibility to give an authentic development to Meliodas about Liz's death. We could have seen him actually evolve or rather, become more mature. I'm not saying to make him like Guts of course, but there's an infinite continuum between that and what we have in Taizai, which is lame. The impact of Liz's death ? Pointless, because she's all but a reincarnation. How can we feel sadness about that if we know for a fact she'll come back anyway ? This makes the love story freaking lame and superficial.
2) Same thing about Meliodas' death. We could have seen the other characters develop without him, specially Ban, but no. He's damned to come back again and again, so we don't even bother about his death and its potential impact on the story anymore.
Actually, nobody ever freaking dies in this manga, except fodders. It makes everything irrelevant, specially when it comes to the sacrificial aspect that could have actually made this manga really good by adding mature content : Hawk sacrifices himself to save others ? who cares anymore, he just came back. Matrona saving Diane ? Same story.
3) Freaking no legitimacy in the actions of the important characters. I mean, the goal of the TC ? "Blabla, kill people, conquer Britannia because we lost the war and losin' ain't cool specially because Meliodas betrayed us". Uh oh. And appart from that, none of the good guys seem to have any decent reason to do something. Meliodas only wanna have some legs party with Elisabeth, same between King and Diane. All they do is always to react : first arc because they took Elisabeth, now because the TC want revenge, later because something will happen with the goddesses. It's quiet lame.
1)An irrelevant mention of a seinen main character(Guts) for a comparison with a shounen main, but even if you brought up one of the heroes of the aforementioned shounens, the comparison would've failed, pretty much due to a similar mathematical situation, also you're personally unable to look at the bigger picture regarding the relationship between Meliodas and Elizabeth(of whom we have no fail-proof evidence as to how she returns, but it doesn't look like "reincarnation" at all). After the Vaizel Helbram situation people should've learnt to not take minor recurring characters' observations at face value, especially when their observation is devalued by the same scene failure to properly recognise the nature of their observation's subject's powers. The impact of the repeated loss of his lover is very much there, but who knows for what personal reasons you don't see it?!
2) Uhhh, how many teenage directed adventurous supernatural comedies have killed their protagonists(the main attention and identification target for the reader) then gone on without them?! Especially when the ongoing, since the dawn of time, archetype of the young hero facing death and overcoming it, as the coming of age trial, is still the closest to most humans' hearts?! Also, you expect the mascot to stay dead?! LMAO! The mentor before offering actual lessons?! Once you've published your story, that does keep their core hero dead(stories started from "beyond the grave" or with the death of the main and are dark comedies don't count), and it's enormously popular, not to mention highly acclaimed by most academics and cultural echelons striving for the support and development of a healthy psyche in young generations, do direct me to it to see for myself if you've managed the "reinvention of the wheel". I'll honestly buy a copy for myself and each of my 2 kids(for when they're 14+ of age
). 3) Double-check with real life history for "legitimacy" in predatory offensive. Also for how much of a realistic incentive for further frustration with the enemy such aggressors experience when they lose their admitted "greatest asset" to the other camp. You say the romance is superficial, I say your reading of this story is half-hearted and equally superficial, the twist Nakaba gave to his Meliodas and Elizabeth take on Romeo and Juliet has finally made me stomach the trope in 15 years. By merely having his characters acknowledging there's more to the world than their relationship and that as heirs or high ranking representatives of their clans, they're responsible with searching for the means of a permanent cease-fire, not merely given a pass for melodramatic actions to prove a point about their love.
I do have to thank you for pointing out yourself quite a mature issue touched by Nakaba: how the sanest, wisest option in life, when it comes to conflict, is to react rather than initiate aggression, even when you're, not so secretly, preparing a definitive countermeasure to the enemy's plans
.
