- Joined
- Jun 1, 2010
- Messages
- 9,681
- Reaction score
- 17,738
- Country
-
Don't let fanatics try to turn this into Mihawk v Wild Animals means that Zoro > Luffy. It's honestly pathetic.
For starters, 18 months is a long time and we don't have 18 months of flashbacks for Neither Luffy or Zoro. We dont know if Luffy ONLY fought animals for that time or if Zoro only fought Mihawk during that time.
While better trainers yield better results, one would have to prove that Mihawk is a better trainer than Rayliegh (which cannot be proven). If Rayliegh felt Luffy fighting animals capable of withstanding G4 was good enough training to prepare Luffy for the NW then who are we to question it.
Where as the only thing we got from Mihawk and Zoro is that Zoro couldn't drink until he mastered Haki.... we have 0 idea at what point in the training Zoro actually was able to master haki... it could have been the next day or a year later. There is 0 evidence that tells us Zoro got more put of the 2 year training than Zoro... 0
Factor in growth rates.... Not a single person could say Zoro's growth > Luffy's growth. Far too much evidence to the contrary.
Its absolute bullshit to use Mihawk > Wild Animals as a piss poor arguement for Zoro > Luffy
For starters, 18 months is a long time and we don't have 18 months of flashbacks for Neither Luffy or Zoro. We dont know if Luffy ONLY fought animals for that time or if Zoro only fought Mihawk during that time.
While better trainers yield better results, one would have to prove that Mihawk is a better trainer than Rayliegh (which cannot be proven). If Rayliegh felt Luffy fighting animals capable of withstanding G4 was good enough training to prepare Luffy for the NW then who are we to question it.
Where as the only thing we got from Mihawk and Zoro is that Zoro couldn't drink until he mastered Haki.... we have 0 idea at what point in the training Zoro actually was able to master haki... it could have been the next day or a year later. There is 0 evidence that tells us Zoro got more put of the 2 year training than Zoro... 0
Factor in growth rates.... Not a single person could say Zoro's growth > Luffy's growth. Far too much evidence to the contrary.
Its absolute bullshit to use Mihawk > Wild Animals as a piss poor arguement for Zoro > Luffy