Monkey : D luffy
Maybe the D is a smile.Monkey : D luffy
Welp, I did suggest that ages ago.Quite frankly, I am kinda against D standing for a specific word or something of the sort. The hype around it is so high that its nearly impossible to live up to it if there is something beyond it just being there. My crackpot theory though:
D its a silly random smile in the middle of people's names.
? Dragons are both literal, and figurative.Nah, I doubt the D stands for dragon. Dragons within one piece and the metaplot in general are antagonistic to the strawhats and other characters. Kaido, the celestial dragons, ryuma's dragon... Even thematically you have the hoof of the soaring dragon.. The only good dragon if you will is momonosuke imo.
Also Poneglyphs kinda look like the oracle bone script and previous chinese scripts.That first pic of the halfmoon on the left kinda look like a flying saucer tipped on the side. The Ds are obviously aliens.
I can see that, loosely, but as interesting as that is, I don't think it's likely. Oda is pretty good about foreshadowing stuff like that, and the moon thing makes a little sense on that front, but the rest of the bonescript stuff? I'm dubious.Also Poneglyphs kinda look like the oracle bone script and previous chinese scripts.
I'd like to revise this prediction, and explain why. I also believe the surname D. and "Will of D" will not mean the same. I still think that Dragons is a good candidate for "Will of D", for the reasons explained above.I'm just gonna throw this random one out there: D. stands for Dragon.
I was leaning towards dawn/dusk up until recently, but I've started to consider the likelyhood of the flower capital/wano being the former capital (or one of the former capitals) of the Ancient Kingdom, whose theme is both sun and flower. Dragons are the real symbol behind that country. The royals were the Ds. Luffy is the liberator, he rides the dragon, but this is a conflict between dragons, good and evil. All the Ds share the will of Dragons, and "Dragons are always sure to cause another storm". They're the real celestial dragons in this story. The Kozuki were the closest retainers to a certain part of that royalty. They're also the sword (sword & spear dichotomy).
Funnily enough, Luffy is also Monkey.
The Shandora bell had the figure of a monkey in it. Monkey's the equivalent of Dragon, to the inhabitants of the moon. Luffy's both monkey (comical, friendly), and dragon (causes storms). The inhabitants of the moon were the spear.
Luffy is both sword & spear (Nika), he hails from the lunar side, but inherited the sun's will, he's the one who fulfills promises, and he's also both Monkey & Dragon.
P.S - I'm aware Monkey Dragon Dragon is weird as fuck, but I've grown away from dawn&dusk, and it'll make for some weird ass moment.
The last sentence goes in line with what I previously told you to try to justify the reasoning behind it.I feel like will of D and the meaning of the D in names has to be the same. It's a pretty literal theme in OP, those who come after inherit the will of those who came before. It's clear to me people with the surname D are not blood related (unless there is a common ancestor 800 years ago) but it's clear most of them have to some capacity inherited something which pushes them to stand up against tyranny in some form (except teach). An idea I've been considering is that perhaps the tenryubito appropriated the dragon imagery and name when their ancestors took over the world. So those who carry the D name could be the ones who inherited the will of the original, presumably "good" dragons.
The thing about the Will of D, and inherited will for that matter, is that it doesn't really require being a D. in order to carry it or pass it on. Law is the easiest example, because he was actually set on a path of destruction, and came to defend those ideals by virtue of a freaking Celestial Dragon and his compassion.The hoof is supposed to be, like I'm trying to say, a fake demonstration of ownership, when they're not even the original "dragons", and the idea of branding people is fundamentally against the ideals of the original ones. Actually, I think that even if you don't take anything I said into account, if there's one thing that most people agree about, is that the World Government are not the original world rulers, or not exclusively. If everything about them is fake, there's a mirrored truth. That's the basis for the prediction.