


--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---


This Oscar race is messing with me.You can, but only the last one counts.We can submit more than once, wut?
1917 and Parasite are gaining momentum it seems, as awards season wraps up and we are going into the Oscars. Can there be a TIE for Best Picture?![]()
No worries!Yeah sorry @Ustegius but I'm gonna be changing my votes again.This Oscar race is messing with me.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
--- Double Post Merged, ---

Orgz already said it, but yup. You are already in. You can make poll multiple times, but only the last one counts.Aren't we supposed to vote that poll thing? I did, so do I have a counting vote now or no?
Uhhh, wait. Who should have won instead then?Green Book winning Best Picture is a fucking joke.
Roma or The Favorite imho.Uhhh, wait. Who should have won instead then?
Well, it's not like I saw everything nominated that year but I thought Green Book was fantastic. Perhaps those two were better films but not sure I would categorize Green Book winning instead as a "fucking joke".Roma or The Favorite imho.
Well, it's not like I saw everything nominated that year but I thought Green Book was fantastic. Perhaps those two were better films but not sure I would categorize Green Book winning instead as a "fucking joke".
Oscar bait in what sense though? Sure it was a period drama and might have been released when it was deliberately, but the director was hardly some renowned director for this kind of subject matter.I guess the main problem with Green Book is the fact that it's pure Oscar bait... but the way Best Picture is decided could've had something to do with it winning best picture.
I have yet to submit my picks /)'0'(\
For what it's worth, I haven't seen the film, but have read extensively about it and how people feel about it on both sides. Mortensen and Ali are super talented, but the issue is with the racial themes that make it "bait" for the audiences, almost as if they want to guilt trip the white people into voting for it.Oscar bait in what sense though? Sure it was a period drama and might have been released when it was deliberately, but the director was hardly some renowned director for this kind of subject matter.
The performances were indeed great. The movie probably isn't winning the awards it does without Ali and Mortensen. I guess I tend to look at the term as more pejorative than how it's sometimes used. After watching it I didn't really have a cynical thought about it in my mind honestly. Which I guess is somewhat surprising...For what it's worth, I haven't seen the film, but have read extensively about it and how people feel about it on both sides. Mortensen and Ali are super talented, but the issue is with the racial themes that make it "bait" for the audiences, almost as if they want to guilt trip the white people into voting for it.
But, the bigger issue at hand is somewhat illustrated here, having the "white guy save the day" multiple times...
Yeah I don't really think it's the film's fault at all if that's the case. I didn't really feel like this is something that was drowning in it's own wokeness so to speak. It dealt with issues of race and sexuality delicately enough, but never in an eye-rolling manner to me.It's also not the film's fault - although they might've tried to capitalize on it - that nowadays everyone seems to be pandering and adhering to the whole "let's not make it OscarsSoWhite again", it almost feels like they're handing out these prizes because of the subject matter so they can seem inclusive and woke.
I'm not trying to take anything away from the craft of the film and the talent involved, but that's just the current reality, however unfortunate it may be.