So how would I go about buying a player out of the game? Do I just post to the secretariat? Do I need to know how much money the other player has or does whoever is the secretariat at the moment just takes the player out of the game once he is notified? Not sure I like this rule, theoretically the second I buy something the other player could attempt to buy me out. Say I spend 300 hundred on something. The odds of the other player having more money than me are astronomical to say the least. Or say I buy someone out of the game. A player being drop from the game would be something noticeable. In that sense, the rest of us would know that a player lost what would most likely be at least a moderate sum of money to get someone out of the game. It'd be like this:
I buy votes from someone. I pay 100 for each vote and buy 3 of them.
I remain with 700 and the other player with 1300.
I am bought out of the game so the other player is left with 600.
People notice someone was bought out.
Someone who has his 1000 takes a shot at the dark. He pays 600 and is left with 400.
Someone else takes a shot. He pays 400 and is left with 600.
Someone without money could be taken out of the game for free.
And so on...
Given the main point of the game, this rule seems very impractical to say the least (provided I understood the rules). A series of shots at the dark could get rid of players relatively quickly and beat the purpose of the game. In the end, the very idea of spending money would be ludicrous given that the person you made a deal with would know almost for a fact that he has more money than you. Heck, considering the nature of the game you don't even need a shot at the dark, the ones with the least money are easy to find. In this money there are not much things which you can use money for. In that sense, when you look at the scoreboard, who among the players is bound to have the least money and who the most? Lets take a look at the current results:
Kkck-sama 33 votes
Ustegius-sama 28 votes
Imperialx-sama 12 votes
I'm_Akiyama-sama 12 votes
Farfalla-sama 11 votes
Farfalla-sama $1450
I'm_Akiyama-sama $1195
Ustegius-sama $1001
Imperialx-sama $1000
Kkck-sama $249
Is it a coincidence the voting scoreboard is basically an inverted version of the money scoreboard (note that I thought about this before checking the actual scoreboard)? Of course not. It is easy to get at least 5 votes each round, just PM another player and it is a done deal. So basically anyone who got more than 5 votes per round did one of two things. The first is that he waited and got lucky. Someone did not contact anyone regarding votes and to avoid giving anyone in particular an excecive advantage he distributes his votes evenly. Its basically free votes. The second one is to buy votes. There are things here and there which you can trade for votes but the most obvious one is money (I have other ideas which for obvious reasons I won't mention

). In mid game there is kinda no purpose to trade votes for anything other than money since you can't really know what direction the game is going to take so naturally the only reasonable thing to trade is money or votes. If you are in the second round of the game, what is the first thing you think when you see someone with 15 votes? The first is that he got 10 votes by trading them for other votes. Then where the hell did this guy got the other 5 votes? He spent his money. In other words, getting votes makes you a target. And who among them is the one who will most likely be able to buy the one in the lead? Easy, whoever has been selling his votes and has barely acquired any. Afterwards, who is the most likely player to get bought out? The dead last one is the easy target considering the odds of him having bought out a player. And who is benefitted from this? Basically the players in the middle who did nothing. This rule beats the purpose of the game IMO.