Re: Shingeki no Kyojin by ISAYAMA Hajime
I think I understand now.
When I ask the question what is so great about it. What I'm really asking is what appeals to you about this series, and what I look for in peoples answer's is stuff that I either didn't notice or doesn't carry the same value to me. The reason for this is because it's the only way I know of to learn whether my judgment of a series is fair. And from what I've read I don't think my judgement was fair.
It's true that the world of Shingeki all fits together very nicely . It is a deep and well built world and the artwork puts a lot of effort into showing that all too you. From the way the castle is built to the equipment of the soldier and everything in between, Shingeki well though out and painstaking put together. It also refuses to use all the conventional things that other mangaka's use to sell there series, like fan-service and such which helps to maintain that world immersion. I think all of that is true, and that is special.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The reason, I suspect, why it never seemed very special to me is because I am a character oriented reader. That's my bias in all things. So I tend to look less at how the world fits together and more how the characters fit together. And to be honest, outside of 4-5 characters, I don't think it's been very good in that respect; due mostly to the large number of "terrified young soldier" archetype that's been introduced.
So that's why I think those aspects didn't stand out as much to me but maybe overtime that aspect will change a little and I'll be able to enjoy it as you guys do.
---------- Post added at 11:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:15 PM ----------
I think it is a mistake to look at character growth as requisite for a good manga, rather than character development. The former is often flawed writing. Self improvement is rarely the linear, perpetually positive process seen in most action manga. Some people do not grow at all, they simply stagnate. Character development is better, the depiction of a characters psychology. Why they do what they do and act how they act. Shingeki has been spectacular at exploring what motivates the major characters, rather than the forced self improvement to often seen in to many mangas.
Never forget that most people do not cope well with adversity. Very few people rise to the occasion. Hiding behind walls is easier, even if safety is merely an illusion. And those who do rise up don't always succeed immediately. Irvin, Eren, Rivaile, and Mikasa are brave souls not content to live walled in from danger. Yet they failed. They returned from this arc beaten, broken, and bloody. Now they must face the consequences. Not only must they cope with the titans, they now have to overcome their own failures, and the resulting political consequences. Even more adversity faces them then before. It makes more sense that most of the characters can not cope with that, can not rise to the situation. That is true of real crisis too.
"Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power."- Abraham Lincoln
(It's my second favorite quote)
People adapt to circumstance it's part of our nature. Sometimes that adaptation is for the better sometimes it's for the worse but they always change and a good character does that too. Adversity just makes that need to adapt even more apparent. When a character does not adapt, both mentally and emotionally, I don't think their acting all that human.
Never the less, I think you are correct character growth is not a prerequisite for a manga to be good but it is a prerequisite in manga's of this type for me to enjoy it properly and that's really what this comes down to for me. It just doesn't suit my tastes right now.
