The main reason I think people would be confused is the time jumping. Like I sort of wonder if it had been edited to be chronological it wouldn't have been a better show. Though the problem there is the Yennifer stuff would have had to be like the first 4 episodes. Which would have been aggressively dull.My main issue with The Witcher was how unconnected each of the episodes felt - I mean, I can see why they focussed on the short stories, as it gave a good intro to the backgrounds of the main 3, but (as someone who has already read quite a lot of the Witcher series) I reckon the story would have been a lot better had they not focussed on the main story instead.
I guess it might have been a bit confusing, as many watchers might not have understood how Geralt and Ciri are related - but I reckon a single episode could have provided just enough of a background to that...
I dunno - I hear they are making a 2nd series, if so then this should be much more watchable.
Not that I disliked the series, just I feel it could have been better if the connection between episodes was a little more obvious
also, as an aside, Yennifer is one of my favourite characters in the books - especially her background, her interactions with the other mages, and her general raison d'être
Speaking of which did you think of their Yennifer plotline? Did that work for you?
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
And I should probably add the only part of the show I thought was legitimately bad was...
The Striga fight. Mainly because it was edited to split time with Yennifers transformation which pretty much ruined the scene. That was terrible.
Last edited:




