Uh pictures or not, it’s still their copyrighted content that’s being revealed to people days before its release for free. Hell, they’re even making money out of it... And the bigger youtube channels are sharing this information with hundreds of thousands of people. It is petty no doubt, but they’re just an easy target since scan websites and groups are largely outside of their control.
There are youtubers who discuss film and television while using short clips and screenshots that display what moment they’re talking about.
I assume it’s the early release that they can use as an arguement against them. Even game and movie reviewers have embargos they can’t really break if they want to keep going in the long term. Edited Manga has been under the radar until now, but there’s no reason it should be allowed when pretty much all other before-streetdate content on official platforms isn’t.
savethecat > savetheyoutuber
Just kidding bro. But your argument isn't making sense. So because they use a few illegal scans it shouldn't be a problem? It's still illegal lmao. That's like if I stole a few dollars from a bank, I shouldn't get arrested cause it was a "few". It might be petty but they expose themselves to this and should know what can come from it.
my point is that it’s such a none issue to even complain about. Maybe if it’s released before official release. But most of the big youtubers don’t seem to include actual pictures from the manga, unless they’re doing a discussion video(which usually uses images from official releases). Maybe the thumbnails, but most of the big youtubers use fan art in their thumbnails.
I never knew it was dated for 2018, official site had it for "coming soon".
None of those Youtubers are doing things before streetdate though. For the next CoD or whatever big game (that will leak) go publish a review before the streedate that's just you talking in front of the camera or a static image of the box art or something and see how quick Activision/whoever take that down
I disagree since people can make, even if only a few dollars, from youtube. It is unfair and wrong to make money in such a manner when joe schmo who reads their weekly dose of BLack Clover, isnt making money either.
did Kimetsu volume 1 flop here? I thought I saw someone posting the before. Both had rocky starts so I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't do very well in the reader surveys making Viz hesitant. Just because something is popular in Japan doesn't mean its success will translate here.
On what stature? Once again just because something is a success in Japan doesn't mean it'll be a hit in the US. The first volume of Kimetsu Viz released didn't even do all that well especially in comparison to Neverland so to say that "they should have gotten it" doesn't mean anything.
Yes but I can honestly say that its appeal is largely with its aesthetic and not its content, its previews didn't heat up discussion like Dr. Stone did but it definitely would not have hurt Viz to put it on the lineup given that they essentially wasted it by putting Robot on there which came to bite them in the ass.
Trust me, those guys are lurking twitter and generally look for suggestions on their handle its why Kimetsu got picked up because people kept nagging them about it so my suggestion is to do the same for Jujutsu.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
IIRC it didn't flop but it didn't do particularly well either, they're heavily promoting volume 2 though getting our favorite resident shill Yonkou and every anitwitter personality to endorse it before it release. Its pretty much depending on whether the anime will explode or not now but it'll definitely help it come spring.
was sure it was only half a year.
according to Wikipedia they got it at chapter 29 so a little over but much close to half a year than a full one https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weekly_Shonen_Jump_(American_magazine)
