Somhow I don' think any of the newcomers will break 10k in their first week with their first volume. Just doesn't feel like it.
"Throughout the history of the magazine, Jump has relied on reader surveys in order to gauge the success of its titles. Nakano said that this system of "valuing new blood" is what has allowed Jump to produce "cutting edge" manga for the times. He also highlighted the global success of One Piece as a positive factor in producing new hits for the magazine, because it gives newcomers a distinct goal to strive for."Jump Editor-in-Chief Explains What's Unusual About Demon Slayer's Success
Weekly Shonen Jump editor-in-chief Hiroyuki Nakano spoke to entertainment magazine Nikkei Entertainment about the current trends in manga. One of the main...www.animenewsnetwork.com
Found this part most interesting:
"This year, Nakano says that Jump still doesn't have enough hits. Although he highlights Chainsaw Man and act-age as titles that he has high expectations for, he describes Jump's editorial department as "desperate to create the next hit." He concluded by saying that the magazine launched three new titles in January, but "it wouldn't be Jump if none of them became a huge hit." "
A little, I guess. Got it from this bit in the otaquest interview, too:
Not really a problem at this point. The manga is far enough that they could easily fill a year if they wanted to.Probably?
Still doesn't mean we're going to get more Super anime unless Toei drags Toriyama's lazy ass off his chair
Uhh, from my experience reading some Japanese manga mags, poor printing paper doesn't explain swallowing entire panel contents like this. Sure this isn't a printing error?
Not really. WSJ has always been about getting newcomers.
You can actually barely make out some of the outlines in the blunder. Think poor printing and the paper quality itself together are the reason.
Having a lot of Shonen Jump in my place, this kind of thing is not due to the poor quality of the magazine. This might be a mistake.
Meh, the article only links to one tweet and one video complaining about said tweet. Can't see this ending up being that big of a deal. Seems more like somebody having a bad take and then somebody else highlighting it for clicks.So there’s apparently another MHA controversy over the birthdays of the characters now.
Not nearly as big as the Doctor’s name, but I’ve seen a few people complaining about it on social media. And been seeing ppl complain about Bakugo’s birthday for a couple years now(which I think is pretty stupid btw)
And we’re back to the “controversies” that make no sense whatsoever. No wonder the fandom gets a bad rap... Welp, I can just ignore this one, as it’s not important.So there’s apparently another MHA controversy over the birthdays of the characters now.
Not nearly as big as the Doctor’s name, but I’ve seen a few people complaining about it on social media. And been seeing ppl complain about Bakugo’s birthday for a couple years now(which I think is pretty stupid btw)
Eh.So there’s apparently another MHA controversy over the birthdays of the characters now.
Not nearly as big as the Doctor’s name, but I’ve seen a few people complaining about it on social media. And been seeing ppl complain about Bakugo’s birthday for a couple years now(which I think is pretty stupid btw)