There's no page in the manga that support Marui improve more than Jackal.
There isn't, but there is proof that different people can improve at different rates without such a note being made. In the time between the team shuffle and the fanbook stats, Atobe's stats increased by 5, Tezuka's by 4.5, Shiraishi's by 2.5, Akaya's by 1.5 and Krauser's by 0.
So if you look at the result from back then and then at the gap there is in stats right now, if anything, Marui having improved more is the conclusion you would arrive at.
You then assume that something happen.
If I'm claiming that Marui using Myougi, Jackal using Nezumi, you're claiming that they doesn't use those move. How is "they didn't use those move" is not "something happened we didn't get to see"?
It's the opposite, I'm saying nothing happened.
How exactly would you show someone not doing something? You'd have to show literally every shot of the match for that, which is obviously not doable.
Since it seem like we're both are trying to claim something that's not been prove that happen in the match, let's look at every other match ever. In the case that the player does have a special move, he tends to show use at least 1 of them in every match that they been in. The probabilities is in my favor by a huge amount by far. Do you want me to do the exact number? Let me know.
I don't care about probabilities, even if it happened 99 out of 100 matches before, it's no proof that it happened in this match as well. And in all of those instances, Konomi actually found it was worth his time to add a page to let us know what moves were used.
He added multiple pages in the volume for the elimination tiebreaks, so surely if something happened in this match as well, he would have put it in.
Again, I claim that nothing happened that we didn't get to see or hear about. The only proof I need for that is to show you every page of the relevant chapters where you will in fact find that nothing was shown or said.
Either way, even if I don't have proof. It would just shows that rally wise, Jackal can play evenly with Marui even with Marui superior stats. This argument doesn't help showing Marui skill at all. If no move is use, it just mean that anyone with stats equal or higher than Jackal can match or beat Marui in rally.
Except it still ignores some crucial points, regardless of whether you use your logic or mine.
If we're using my argument, it's very possible that Marui improved by a greater amount than Jackal. And I furthermore claim that I don't need a page which explicitly supports this because the evidence we have available already proves that people improve at different rates without it being specifically mentioned.
If we're using your argument, then it's certainly true that someone with Jackal's stats can rally evenly with Marui, but it also means that you should be rating Jackal higher than his stats, rather than rating Marui lower, because Marui's abilities were tested against a tougher opponent.
Sure, there's a chance he overcome the unpredictable part of it. From what we seen, he still didn't read it, he just try to use his base stats to cover for it.
I don't understand this bit. It was said that Tezuka completely broke through GUYU, a move that used him predicting his opponent's moves against him. Why should Fuji's unpredictable attacks be treated differently?
---------- Post added at 07:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:57 PM ----------
I wouldn't go that far. It clearly says
here has improved his accuracy when hitting the ball through CE.
The way I read that, it refers to him being able to actually hit the ball without seeing it.