I'll just say, let's wait and see.That's a big part of what I said James did, though, although that was more last phase than this one
Priority 3. You can take a look at the full updated priority list in the rules thread.
Seriously? That's it? It is easy to guess that we got all dets and docs in the game, we lost only two people so far a Mafia Poisoner and the Politican given nobody was forced to change his vote yet. Or hell changed his vote to begin with compared to Day 1 where Farf had to change early and flipped out because of it. Besides wasn't Farf the one who started the whole syx is politican argument? -_-In the Farfs vs. Evil fight I definitely buy what Farfs is saying more than Evil, who just seemed to not want to let go of his proposed main suspect... and then suddenly did. He's behaving kind of weird imo but could be due to his roleplaying (which I don't want to diss) or that I haven't played against him in a long time I think.
When you drop crazy pieces of research and info ("key evidence") like this and you're Simon Blackquill... do you realize how fitting that is?
Anyway, the ones I distrust the most are still James Rye and Lambu.
James: Aside from the reasons in my big, first post of this Trial phase, there's also the weird part where he seemed to assume(/know?) that syx was Townie, and that we still have all our Docs and Dets in the game. Farf bluntly called him out on this but he never responded. Just gave me even more weird vibes from him.
Lambu: Pretty much what I said in previously mentioned big post, not really built upon that suspicion this phase. Never got around to correcting the things I supposedly got wrong in my post, though,
These two have each other as top suspects, though, which kinda bugs me, but it's not unheard of that Mafia openly throw suspicion at each other.
Anyway, for now vote kill James Rye.
So why are you giving Van the benefit of doubt but not me? You really believe Van's a Mason and not a Mafia Mason or heck a Mason to begin with? He never claimed that role it was Farf or was it Erin saying he probably got it.I could reveal it and testify for you if you answer my question just now.
Oh no, mine is just a hunch and a process of elimination from the ones that voted syx: Either me, Vandred or you are a mafia.
Im sure I am not mafia of courseand Im giving the benefit of the doubt to Vandred, but you... are just rolling around, like I always did when I was Janitor.
How can you know that?
How isLike James?
The vote change could be a gambler too .
Because so far no one has changed their vote, duh. We all either haven't voted or we are still on the first one we voted for, so no changes ergo no politician who wouldn't want to wait too long in case of his target not getting online anymore in the next couple hours to change his/her vote. it's why syx is probably politician and why that action was used to early on farf on day 1 to ensure that the action gets through.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Sure, but Gambler runs a risk of failing and handing over a vote plus if he fails a couple times he loses his role, nobody would want that happen to early. Such risks are better left for later when votes are getting tight and a change is needed. On day 1 no change was needed it seems to happen just for the sake of happenings which is why Farf flipped out as she was the target of that nonsense.
So you are going full:
At least Vandred said something and has shown something about himself.
True, I didn't give many hints at all. But it doesn't change the fact that most of your posts read like fillers.
No, it wasnt, it was Gryff.
It doesn't say it but it should be the same. It can be updated later.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Crucial information like that would've been added, at least I would assume so. Especially for newer players.
