Depends on what she reveals today, I suppose. If it's nothing really worthy of being learned or if she doesn't sound very convincing, I'll just switch to the Prosecutor.According to Gryff, Bel might be mafia. What will be your next target?
Depends on what she reveals today, I suppose. If it's nothing really worthy of being learned or if she doesn't sound very convincing, I'll just switch to the Prosecutor.According to Gryff, Bel might be mafia. What will be your next target?
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Well you say two dets but Gryff from his result apparently had even better success than you. 2 guilty and even a confirmation on Arj. So why did he insist to wait for you? How does det fit his claim? But more importantly, despite his results he claimed he suspects demon more, listing me as an after thought and not even mentioning Bel, but swings back fill circle after your post reports. You should have insisted he post result first and then I believe you could have seen something interesting with a wagon building in a completely different direction. You believe there's 2 Mort's, 2 dets, investigator and spy? If so, then yeah guess I have nothing more to say. Have funSorry, Holt. But two Det results are up to your death plus your role is not that important, so this is kind of a no-brainer just like daws death should have been. Even if the Mafia got a bomb on their side they lost too many members at this point that a defuser matters much.
I think I might get a look on Erin the next night. What about you Gryf? If we are both insane we should check different targets then. If Holt turns out to be townie though, then it would mean we both are sane and there is no way that two sane dets would be allowed to the townie sides. Sounds way too strong to me. Well, we'll see what sanity we got once Holt get lynched.^^
So Demon then? You think either me or Gryf are lying but if so why would he take on the same result on Holt like I did? Claiming he got guilty on Holt would have made more sense if he was Mafia after I wrote my investigation result before his. But yeah, two insane dets and two morticians? That is a weird mix for sure.... sigh I see Holt's points and altho we're ahead I cant shake the feeling of setup and a mafia bomb + the one someone mentioned that could cause a bloodbath could be a terrible combo and now I'm re-thinking if we should rely so comfortably on our numbers and take the obvious path...
Yeah, I did lie about my role. Its up to you to believe it or not. Demonspeed had the same question as you about why I suspected you, him, and Erin and left out Bel. I already explained it was because me being insane(via guilty on Arjuna) led me to believe that James was sane(and he got guilty on DS) so that's why I suspected him. Erin because of the mortician claim as well, but that is a weak case imo. I left out Bel because I was waiting for her to claim.I just got here, interesting turn of events but what I'll say is, first everyone is saying there is no bomb, if there was a mafia bomb, would you expect him/her to own up? And even as town bomb, if you're not on the verge of being lynched, owning up negates your role, cos clearly mafia know to keep away. Isn't it ideal to bait instead?
Anyway, I suppose you all don't think diffuser is important since no one owned up to bomb, but at least say that and don't make it seem like I made a convenient claim. From all my hints, there was nothing conflicting about my claim, and I did this all rather early.
You're willing to believe Gryff would explicitly lied about his role. Yeah he argues it's to protect his role but he came on today, and mentioned his suspects which were demon, Erin and me, despite apparently getting guilty on both me and Bel? How does that correlate? James I believe is indeed the det, but then he's willing to believe Demon (self-claimed 2nd mortician) over me. Can't say I'm surprised. I believe he might be legitimate but ever since he came out as det with guilty on Demon, he's been hoping to be insane or paranoid even under the assumption that he's the only det.
Then funny enough, Gryff himself votes last on me? Though he should be 100% sure of his results? TBH, it's hilarious really. All game I've had bel on my ass claiming I'm the janitor because of my hint (which I still believe is ridiculous), janitor turns up dead and now a hidden det conveniently turns up with results of me and Bel. For the record, let's analyze me and Bel both guilty. Either we are same team or different. If we're same team, then she basically decided since D1 to throw me under the bus. I'm not sure I need to reinstate how silly that would be. If we're different team, then she was somehow 100% sure I'm janitor since D1...
Anyway, I speak only for myself but I'm not mafia. And it's equally hilarious demon says I must be mafia because James has a different result now. As though this is apparently more obvious than a sole det naming a second claimed mortician guilty
Anyway same as yesterday Votekill Demon.--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
I was waiting for James to get a separate result, maybe on Arjuna but even more perfect that it's me, because now I'm confident enough you're guilty. And claiming you and Erin's report fits is on your word only. She revealed before you, and you also conveniently targeted the same person. I shouldn't be surprised, you're already way too good at this.
Yeah, I think we should go after different people. Maybe pick a list of 3 people, and I will pick a different list of 3 people, that way mafia won't know if we're coming to investigate them. We could be targeted at night, so we should name our list so if one of us is gone, the town knows who that detective went after.Sorry, Holt. But two Det results are up to your death plus your role is not that important, so this is kind of a no-brainer just like daws death should have been. Even if the Mafia got a bomb on their side they lost too many members at this point that a defuser matters much.
I think I might get a look on Erin the next night. What about you Gryf? If we are both insane we should check different targets then. If Holt turns out to be townie though, then it would mean we both are sane and there is no way that two sane dets would be allowed to the townie sides. Sounds way too strong to me. Well, we'll see what sanity we got once Holt get lynched.^^
What I am mafia now.Yeah, I did lie about my role. Its up to you to believe it or not. Demonspeed had the same question as you about why I suspected you, him, and Erin and left out Bel. I already explained it was because me being insane(via guilty on Arjuna) led me to believe that James was sane(and he got guilty on DS) so that's why I suspected him. Erin because of the mortician claim as well, but that is a weak case imo. I left out Bel because I was waiting for her to claim.
How did I vote last on you. There are 7 players left to vote at the time of this post. Not sure what point you're making here. I am sure of my results, unless someone is going to make a compelling case for Arjuna being mafia to explain my guilty result on him.
Yeah, I think we should go after different people. Maybe pick a list of 3 people, and I will pick a different list of 3 people, that way mafia won't know if we're coming to investigate them. We could be targeted at night, so we should name our list so if one of us is gone, the town knows who that detective went after.
I didn't say that. I said I got guilty on you in my investigation thus proving me insane.What I am mafia now.
Go on lynch me and it will only prove that Gryff you are actually Mafia.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Oh understood that.I didn't say that. I said I got guilty on you in my investigation thus proving me insane.
Hate to do it erin....Tbh even if its totally weird i do think its not impossible theres 2 morticians especially due to the theme of the game and considering we got some games with several unusual roles in the same game, knowing gry and gnut, its a plausible thing, also there was a post on discussion thread on how spicy gnuty were during preparation, i actually dont even distrust demon claim, otherwise i would be voting him.
Also if i were mafia i wouldnt go for such a claim while i know everyone's claims with the bunch of investigatives hints . Again i described properly the answers i got from hosts. I wouldnt be able to make up that from a role i never got before, if i wanted to lie i would have came up with a safer option.
again my points, someone between desin and james was saved (gambler ability used on me on d2) + evil bold vote on lambu plus him saying he at least saving one check back his post
I tend to think as said earlier, the one hes trying to save likely to be janitor or mafia boss, i dont think Eviol would go that far for a less important role. Because of the role change i thought its more likely desin but still some stuff bugs me on james (check back the points i mentionned earlier).
As for pompom death cant tell if its a bk redirection, if its not as i said earlier, its likely the red mafia has less experienced players or people who didnt pay attention to some stuff said about pompom being blocked by Lambu and being likely mafia considering the "only one kill", thats why i dont think demon, farf, van to be among them, they would never go for a high probability mafia on night kill, unless its for strategy.
you can lynch me if you dont trust me im fine with it. But keep in mind for next day.
- what i said about desin & james, one of them boldly being saved by evil meaning one of them might be janitor or mafia boss (cant tell which one though)
- gryf : james on said something like gryf is the only confirmed townie bc he did vote for spriggan instead of saving him when he could, that bugged me bc gryf was the last to cast his vote on spriggan and ofc saving spriggan would have been highly suspicious, so therefore what he did would be a smart mafia move. If James ends up mafia, gryf might be too.
- i dont necessary distrust zasz but im amazed how he could survive last night with such a claim.
- same for james and Aizen.
- Aizen might be mafia & dont know anything about marma. i do think theres likely some mafia among them.
- no idea about SoD
Please @Crescent_jinxgrace could you tell me who you did target on n1 and n2 ?
Well I think Farfalla did a very good job misinterpreting it.Not really surprising that they'd go for the only one claiming Doctor after yesterday... Not sure if they didn't catch what I think desin was hinting or if that means he's dirty, but too bad about Crescent
@Lambu, did you block me or someone else? I can say pretty safely who you blocked if it wasn't me (and if the Reds don't have an Escort themselves, which I doubt).
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---

--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Sure crescent reveals her being doing doc only yesterday but Zasz heavily hinted his role on D1 and he s likely vigilante if i didnt mlisunderstand the conv we got. Never underestimate the power of Kappa-kunThe mafia who would rather go for the only Doc first, I guess, since the DTV or Prosecutor could always be tricked into going for an innocent. Besides, I'd say the two mafias have been pretty accurate in hindering one another from what I can see, but not so much about taking care of the best townie roles. Losing only three townies in three nights, without even having lynched one so far, is very fortunate for town in such a setup.
.

I can't shake off this feeling xD And it's not "a hunch". Again, we have 6 functional investigative roles - the 2 dets and 1 spy don't have bs sanities (2 insane dets isn't even that confusing for it to sound like a drawback, since it has precedent and it's not that hard to clear) AND you have 1 more role to copy them xDDD (the Apprentice). Maybe the 2 morts could have ended up with 1 of them dead, and that was the bigged drawback, but the early claims that became a new things helped with "clearing" that. So, we got a game with a potential of 7 investigative roles? In a game with 21 players? Ok, it's a court game, but a third of the players can snoop in? And none of them is mafia so far, which means, that if James and Gryff are saying the truth, then Holt and Bel could be mafia dets as well, to also fit the theme? What an investigative spam, lmao. Bel denied having an investigative role, but so did Gryff, and since she said her role requires her to "observe", I wanna see what she'll say.It could be a ploy to lynch Holt indeed, but James claims to have gotten Innocent on Holt too. Between James and Gryff, I would say it's Gryff that's the liar because his hints don't match.
I think we should yeah, cause of a simple reason (correct me if I'm wrong): if Holt shows up as mafia, that doesn't clear you. Let's say you are a mafia detective or you have a mafia detective with you. You could know beforehand Holt's mafia, and after crossing that with James results, it's of course likely people would go for Holt to check both situations, so it could still be a ploy. And I doubt both dets are lying, and if one is, imo it would have to be you, Gryff, taking advantage of James's results (you said it yourself, you lied, you waited for him, and so on). So even if Holt shows up as mafia, I don't trust you yet. You could be doing that to gain our trust and then, of course, we would move to Belserion next, based on your results. Guess what, she's one of the few we have no idea about what she is xDDD Heck, her apprentice took a gamble on her, lmao, he doesn't seem to know either. As a mafia det, you could know what she is. Maybe she's a bomb, a freeman, or wtv. Even if those don't fit her role, trap roles require lies and I won't even talk about a freeman...Yeah, I think we should go after different people. Maybe pick a list of 3 people, and I will pick a different list of 3 people, that way mafia won't know if we're coming to investigate them. We could be targeted at night, so we should name our list so if one of us is gone, the town knows who that detective went after.
I missed a "not"Well I think Farfalla did a very good job misinterpreting it.
It's not like the word "triggered" helped me there. Let's go back to your case later.--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Oh, missed this quote. The answer is no, if by chance those possibilites are true, Demon wouldn't be my pick, he would also not clear the situation of the insane dets possibly covernig a mafia.So Demon then? You think either me or Gryf are lying but if so why would he take on the same result on Holt like I did? Claiming he got guilty on Holt would have made more sense if he was Mafia after I wrote my investigation result before his. But yeah, two insane dets and two morticians? That is a weird mix for sure.
