The Last Person to Post Wins - Taimatsu-Maru

[gnut]

Well guys this does it for me. Goodnight .
Also in some sad news, a cousin of mine who just had a kid less than a week or so has a hernia next to his groin.

So any peeps that pray here, have him ( Luka ) in your thoughts /prayer.

Thanks ~

Arent hernias usually there?



@Xadyu
Heardcthis gem today aint heard in 20yrs...xD

 

[GrySun]

I still can't believe that the pants were the sole reason for the dismissal of the allegations - whether that is just my personal naivety to the stupidity of people, or that I am right and there surely was other (stronger) evidence given (and the pants were just the thing the media latched on to as a strong 'talking point'), I'm not quite sure.

After reading that article, I believe it‘s the latter. It was part of the closing statement, and got rightfully noticed by people due to how wrong such a statement is on so many levels. But feel like many only understand this as the sole reason he was acquitted, which I can‘t believe to be likely. Even Orgz said in his post that was the reason for it, without that actually being said anywhere from what I read. So the outrage is quite heavily misdirected, and should be more directed at the lawyer and bad lawyer practices than at the justice system and saying „that‘s the reason people get away wih it nowadays!“. Rape cases, both real and fake, are very difficult to actually prove or disprove if you only have two people saying different things. Must be a pretty shitty type of cases for judges to preside over actually, because unless there‘s big evidence for either conclusion then it‘s quite a toss up.

But this taught me today what a thong with a lace front is

--- Double Post Merged, Nov 21, 2018, Original Post Date: Nov 21, 2018 ---

Wish me luck guys...i start Monday

http://www.threebirdstavern.com/

Was signing up for that planned? If you don‘t mind me asking. Since just a few days ago you wanted to do uber work but now you signed up for a similar position you used to work in, albeit most likely without all the horrible parts you had to endure back there.

--- Double Post Merged, Nov 21, 2018 ---

The penalty set, I’m presuming.

As much as I hate to see that gorgeous set () go, it’s always a sense of comfort when Gry goes back to Speedwagon avy.

I agree the face in a sunflower was beautiful.

--- Double Post Merged, Nov 21, 2018 ---

Bro...i went to tag you during community awards...and your name wouldn't come up.
I thought you deleted your acct...
Watzup

I think deleting accounts isn‘t even possible Only by admins but they‘d have no reason to bother with it.

 

[Charlie]

Arent hernias usually there?

Near the groin? Idk. He has to get surgery but I never heard of newborns having hernia.

 

[Organizized]

After reading that article, I believe it‘s the latter. It was part of the closing statement, and got rightfully noticed by people due to how wrong such a statement is on so many levels. But feel like many only understand this as the sole reason he was acquitted, which I can‘t believe to be likely. Even Orgz said in his post that was the reason for it, without that actually being said anywhere from what I read. So the outrage is quite heavily misdirected, and should be more directed at the lawyer and bad lawyer practices than at the justice system and saying „that‘s the reason people get away wih it nowadays!“. Rape cases, both real and fake, are very difficult to actually prove or disprove if you only have two people saying different things. Must be a pretty shitty type of cases for judges to preside over actually, because unless there‘s big evidence for either conclusion then it‘s quite a toss up.

Yeah, I worded it a bit wrong in my first post due to frustration, but like I explained in the other post, what I’m really mad with is the fact that this can be held as any sort of “evidence”, that the victim wearing a certain thing can still be used as a way to cast the blame on her. Even if there was more substantial evidence (though if there was, I don’t see why she’d use this in her closing argument), that in itself is enough to raise protests for sure.
And indeed, the actual protesting is about that - the #thisisnotconsent thing is directed at the fact that these sort of things can still be used as evidence to free a potential rapist.
But anyway, I just wanted to vent a bit because it stirred up a lot of memories from personal (though second-hand) experiences. Enough about this for now.

 

[Xadyu]

@GrySun try these two; Manhole & Loop

 

[GrySun]

Yeah, I worded it a bit wrong in my first post due to frustration, but like I explained in the other post, what I’m really mad with is the fact that this can be held as any sort of “evidence”, that the victim wearing a certain thing can still be used as a way to cast the blame on her. Even if there was more substantial evidence (though if there was, I don’t see why she’d use this in her closing argument), that in itself is enough to raise protests for sure.
And indeed, the actual protesting is about that - the #thisisnotconsent thing is directed at the fact that these sort of things can still be used as evidence to free a potential rapist.
But anyway, I just wanted to vent a bit because it stirred up a lot of memories from personal (though second-hand) experiences. Enough about this for now.

Do you know if it was actually used as evidence by the court? Seems more to me like it was part of the lawyers words, and those can mostly say whatever. I think it was the lawyers intention to use that as some sort of convincing evidence, but doubt that specifically was written down anywhere in the procedure as one of the things the judge considers. Maybe only his closing statement in general.
If the court used that in the decision then it‘s another matter, but I think it was only evidence in the eyes of the lawyer who said that in hopes to affect someone. Don‘t know if it was used directly as evidence as you say.

--- Double Post Merged, Nov 21, 2018, Original Post Date: Nov 21, 2018 ---

But yeah don‘t need to talk about this. It‘s maybe just me being naive in thinking that can‘t come anywhere close to evidence, even slightly on the same ground as testimonies of people involved.

 

[Organizized]

Do you know if it was actually used as evidence by the court? Seems more to me like it was part of the lawyers words, and those can mostly say whatever. I think it was the lawyers intention to use that as some sort of convincing evidence, but doubt that specifically was written down anywhere in the procedure as one of the things the judge considers. Maybe only his closing statement in general.
If the court used that in the decision then it‘s another matter, but I think it was only evidence in the eyes of the lawyer who said that in hopes to affect someone. Don‘t know if it was used directly as evidence as you say.

Well they do have a juror system, meaning the closing argument is from the lawyer to the jury (in this case 8 men and 4 women). So yes, it is seen as evidence because it’s there to “win over” the jury who cast the final verdict.

“Although it’s unclear whether the jury was influenced by the display of the underwear, at issue for many is the fact that Ireland has no specific law regarding whether such evidence should be used to impugn someone’s character or virtue. As a result, jurors must weigh the value of such items as evidence.”

The only other pieces of info I’ve found from the trial is this:
“The jury of eight men and four women heard from the defendant at trial. He reportedly testified he and the teen had been “attracted to one another” and she consented to sex.

Prosecutor Tom Creed argued a witness allegedly said the defendant had his hand on the teen’s throat.

“She is quite clear she did not consent,” Creed said in court. “She said she never had sexual intercourse before.”

But anyway, let’s really drop the topic now, I keep getting angry over and over again and this is supposed to be a “Fun Thread”.

 

[Charlie]

So" the man" has sent me to do a pee test for him.
Apparently, it is required for the insurance the company has now.

It's been such a long time when I had to pee for the man for work .

 

[gnut]

After reading that article, I believe it‘s the latter. It was part of the closing statement, and got rightfully noticed by people due to how wrong such a statement is on so many levels. But feel like many only understand this as the sole reason he was acquitted, which I can‘t believe to be likely. Even Orgz said in his post that was the reason for it, without that actually being said anywhere from what I read. So the outrage is quite heavily misdirected, and should be more directed at the lawyer and bad lawyer practices than at the justice system and saying „that‘s the reason people get away wih it nowadays!“. Rape cases, both real and fake, are very difficult to actually prove or disprove if you only have two people saying different things. Must be a pretty shitty type of cases for judges to preside over actually, because unless there‘s big evidence for either conclusion then it‘s quite a toss up.

But this taught me today what a thong with a lace front is

--- Double Post Merged, Nov 21, 2018, Original Post Date: Nov 21, 2018 ---

Was signing up for that planned? If you don‘t mind me asking. Since just a few days ago you wanted to do uber work but now you signed up for a similar position you used to work in, albeit most likely without all the horrible parts you had to endure back there.

--- Double Post Merged, Nov 21, 2018 ---

I agree the face in a sunflower was beautiful.

--- Double Post Merged, Nov 21, 2018 ---

I think deleting accounts isn‘t even possible Only by admins but they‘d have no reason to bother with it.

I can still do Uber if i want...thats the good thing.
But the money just isnt good enough for full time.
This job will be steady pay.

 

[Charlie]

I can still do Uber if i want...thats the good thing.
But the money just isnt good enough for full time.
This job will be steady pay.

Did they make you do a pee test?

 

[gnut]

Did they make you do a pee test?

No...you trying to jynx me madafuka???

 

[Xadyu]

Did they make you do a pee test?

Do you really think he would've gotten the job if they did?

 

[Charlie]

Do you really think he would've gotten the job if they did?

Yeah man, I hear you. Wonder how he got his passport as well....

 

[Farfalla]

They asked: what for
He said: to go to Brazil
They said: ah ok

 

[Shobu_Yoruichi]

 

[Organizized]

The notion of not having a passport is something which never occurred to me.. don’t know why. Always felt like something everyone just has.

Was Brazil your first trip outside the US, Greg?

 

[Xadyu]

I don't have a passport.

 

[Farfalla]

A good place for him to lose his abroad trip virginity. At least one for them.

 

[Organizized]

I don't have a passport.

Well, I can see that, since you never leave the house let alone the country.

(That’s a compliment.)

 

[GrySun]

The notion of not having a passport is something which never occurred to me.. don’t know why. Always felt like something everyone just has.

Was Brazil your first trip outside the US, Greg?

Always thought so too, but maybe just a Europe thing