There's three trains of thought from the game that can be tested
Option 1: Yeet the investigatives
Someone could be lying so do we risk getting it wrong by cutting another det claim off (pom or styl), or in a really risky wold nash?
Option 2: Verify sanities
Lynch snehal or vali to try and consolidate what sanity a det claim can be
Option 3: Explosives
We throw all caution to the window and lynch the most distrusted of the bomb trio (myself, dego, arrow) with high risk of collateral (dego or arrow exploding (not like copan when he sees a naughty rin cosplayer))
I prefer option 2, or 1; 3 is too dangerous
I don't think I will be voting one of the investigators, the reason is straight forward : I think 3 dets in this game is very doable, with how small the usability window if dets is and the fact that there are many townies (aka probably at least 1 miller) and probably mafia boss is around as well, 3 dets seems very reasonable and not even that good tbh
option 3 has a lot of collateral damage, and if we don't manage to dive more, we may as well consider ourselves lost
option 2 is just a shot in the dark, a desperate shot basically because we were not able to find any good lynches
tbh, thinking about it, 2 spies is the lesser believable thing and nash's targets seem convient as well. so idk, I might just vote for nash et the end of the day. at least between the options you gave me, that's the least risky I think. but I might just join you in shooting in the dark, even tho I don't agree that much I think it's a better option than the others