American Politics

Reebi

Registered User
英雄メンバー / Eiyuu Menbaa / Hero Member
Joined
May 10, 2017
Messages
2,432
Reaction score
4,091
Gender
Female
Country
Canada
The issue with a sales tax is that it would still hit poorer people harder. If you live on a budget a substantial portion, if not all, of what you spend will be subjected to a sales tax then your bottom line is hit pretty hard. On the other hand, yes, wealthier people spend more but since they are wealthy they don't necessarily spend all of their income every month. They get to save money or invest it and obviously none of that would pay a sales tax. Which I would argue is unfair for particularly poor people who are on a budget and do have to pay a sales tax over virtually everything they consume. I am not specifically against a sales tax BUT it is not something a country can solely rely on to get its much needed tax money to pay for streets, education, health care... Income tax makes sense, what is lacking here is simply governments which make honest attempts at tackling loopholes so that everyone pays what they should.

Besides, for a country to gather what it needs from a sales tax assuming there is no income tax then logically it would have to substantially raise the sales tax... Imagine being on a budget and having to pay several times the sales tax you already do. I don't see how a sales tax model only would be anything less than draconian on the poor.
Sales tax only would be a stupid model for revenue but for taxing non necessities (not food, dipers, children's clothing etc.) is a quite fair compared to increasing income taxes for everyone. Poverty in the US is mainly because there is a lack of free healthcare and education. If there are more taxes to supply these for everyone, the poor could survive.


Are those economists dumb? All that does is hurt the poor. Better to increase income tax on the wealthy and take away tax cuts from them and most businesses.


Taxing small businesses doesn't allow them to compete with the larger ones and larger businesses exploit loopholes or move to another country with less taxes. :notrust

More taxes = more $$$ for social programs for the poor. In Scandinavian countries their taxes are high but they have less expenses with tuition, transportation and healthcare. Here in Canada, yes the sales tax is high but if I go to the hospital it's covered unless I want a private room. If it was just income tax, there would be less disposable income to spend money. With taxing non necessities, people choose to buy an item; thus the taxing is less forced.
 

M3J

MH Senpai
神のごとし / Kami no Gotoshi / Godlike
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
48,828
Reaction score
17,292
Gender
Male
Country
Akatsuki
By most businesses, I mean that we don't tax small businesses.

And larger businesses already do that, no? We could at least try to close those loopholes and make it harder for the companies to either move to other countries or to get their stuff here with tariffs and etc.

Well then, you'd have to determine what would be taxable and what wouldn't, as a lot of food items can be taxed if served hot, apparently, among other stuff. Dunno if it's like that out of US though.
 

Reebi

Registered User
英雄メンバー / Eiyuu Menbaa / Hero Member
Joined
May 10, 2017
Messages
2,432
Reaction score
4,091
Gender
Female
Country
Canada
By most businesses, I mean that we don't tax small businesses.

And larger businesses already do that, no? We could at least try to close those loopholes and make it harder for the companies to either move to other countries or to get their stuff here with tariffs and etc.

Well then, you'd have to determine what would be taxable and what wouldn't, as a lot of food items can be taxed if served hot, apparently, among other stuff. Dunno if it's like that out of US though.
Businesses operate based on money. The only way to prevent them from moving is to have lower barriers, such as taxes. Low tariffs also work but Trump seems to ignore that and companies that export from the US are suffering from his illogical decisions.
 

Franckie

Registered User
有名人 / Yuumeijin / Celebrity
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
2,902
Reaction score
1,381
Gender
Hidden
Country
United States
The issue with a sales tax is that it would still hit poorer people harder. If you live on a budget a substantial portion, if not all, of what you spend will be subjected to a sales tax then your bottom line is hit pretty hard. On the other hand, yes, wealthier people spend more but since they are wealthy they don't necessarily spend all of their income every month. They get to save money or invest it and obviously none of that would pay a sales tax. Which I would argue is unfair for particularly poor people who are on a budget and do have to pay a sales tax over virtually everything they consume. I am not specifically against a sales tax BUT it is not something a country can solely rely on to get its much needed tax money to pay for streets, education, health care... Income tax makes sense, what is lacking here is simply governments which make honest attempts at tackling loopholes so that everyone pays what they should.

Besides, for a country to gather what it needs from a sales tax assuming there is no income tax then logically it would have to substantially raise the sales tax... Imagine being on a budget and having to pay several times the sales tax you already do. I don't see how a sales tax model only would be anything less than draconian on the poor.
European taxes tend to be more regressive than US taxes but they offset this fact by virtue of having more efficient welfare states. (European welfare states are not really so much larger than the American one.)

Businesses operate based on money. The only way to prevent them from moving is to have lower barriers, such as taxes. Low tariffs also work but Trump seems to ignore that and companies that export from the US are suffering from his illogical decisions.
Countries with "high taxes" tend to be pretty good at keeping people employed. In recent years, European countries have done a much better job than we have of preserving and creating jobs. This fact is best illustrated by the employment/population ratio—the percentage of people with jobs in the population. In 2013, most European welfare states had ratios of more than 80% for those in their prime working years, while the US ratio was barely above 75%.

One reason for this is that European companies are not burdened with the enormous cost of providing health insurance for their workers, as American employers are. That cost is financed by broad-based consumption taxes that do not fall on businesses. Moreover, the VAT is rebated at the border on exports, so that the tax does not raise the price of exports. These two factors make European exporters very competitive relative to those in the United States, where many taxes such as the corporate tax cannot be rebated and therefore reduce international competitiveness.

Not having to provide health insurance also makes it much easier to start and grow businesses in many welfare states. The fact that entrepreneurs receive valuable services for their taxes makes them much less sensitive to them than Americans are. A recent article in Inc. magazine about booming entrepreneurship in heavily taxed Norway made this point:

The first thing I learned is that Norwegians don’t think about taxes the way we do. Whereas most Americans see taxes as a burden, Norwegian entrepreneurs tend to see them as a purchase, an exchange of cash for services. “I look at it as a lifelong investment,” says Davor Sutija, CEO of Thinfilm, a Norwegian start-up that is developing a low-cost version of the electronic tags retailers use to track merchandise.
In the US, workers are forced to bear all of the burden of economic adjustment through layoffs and unemployment when there is a recession, even as Republicans contend that all recessions are caused by the Federal Reserve or government screw-ups. European countries, by contrast, have been highly successful with short-time schemes that allow workers to reduce work hours while subsidizing their pay. These allow businesses to hold on to valuable workers and prevent their skills from deteriorating, and also makes it much easier to ramp up production when growth is restored. And wage subsidies are a powerful means of fiscal stimulus. Many analysts have testified to the efficiency of this system and urged its adoption in the United States even though it would involve “big government.”

In addition to wage subsidies, the European welfare state facilitates labor adjustment when necessary. And an important part of the welfare state in Europe involves strong support for education. Germany, for example, recently abolished college tuition. By contrast, American college students must often go deeply into debt just to get an education. High education and skill levels plus wage compression that is augmented by government benefits combine to offset the negative economic effects of the welfare state in Europe to a large extent (see here, here, here, and here).
 

Reebi

Registered User
英雄メンバー / Eiyuu Menbaa / Hero Member
Joined
May 10, 2017
Messages
2,432
Reaction score
4,091
Gender
Female
Country
Canada
European taxes tend to be more regressive than US taxes but they offset this fact by virtue of having more efficient welfare states. (European welfare states are not really so much larger than the American one.)


Countries with "high taxes" tend to be pretty good at keeping people employed. In recent years, European countries have done a much better job than we have of preserving and creating jobs. This fact is best illustrated by the employment/population ratio—the percentage of people with jobs in the population. In 2013, most European welfare states had ratios of more than 80% for those in their prime working years, while the US ratio was barely above 75%.

One reason for this is that European companies are not burdened with the enormous cost of providing health insurance for their workers, as American employers are. That cost is financed by broad-based consumption taxes that do not fall on businesses. Moreover, the VAT is rebated at the border on exports, so that the tax does not raise the price of exports. These two factors make European exporters very competitive relative to those in the United States, where many taxes such as the corporate tax cannot be rebated and therefore reduce international competitiveness.

Not having to provide health insurance also makes it much easier to start and grow businesses in many welfare states. The fact that entrepreneurs receive valuable services for their taxes makes them much less sensitive to them than Americans are. A recent article in Inc. magazine about booming entrepreneurship in heavily taxed Norway made this point:



In the US, workers are forced to bear all of the burden of economic adjustment through layoffs and unemployment when there is a recession, even as Republicans contend that all recessions are caused by the Federal Reserve or government screw-ups. European countries, by contrast, have been highly successful with short-time schemes that allow workers to reduce work hours while subsidizing their pay. These allow businesses to hold on to valuable workers and prevent their skills from deteriorating, and also makes it much easier to ramp up production when growth is restored. And wage subsidies are a powerful means of fiscal stimulus. Many analysts have testified to the efficiency of this system and urged its adoption in the United States even though it would involve “big government.”

In addition to wage subsidies, the European welfare state facilitates labor adjustment when necessary. And an important part of the welfare state in Europe involves strong support for education. Germany, for example, recently abolished college tuition. By contrast, American college students must often go deeply into debt just to get an education. High education and skill levels plus wage compression that is augmented by government benefits combine to offset the negative economic effects of the welfare state in Europe to a large extent (see here, here, here, and here).
Most European countries have higher income taxes but their corporate taxes are pretty low compared to the US. The EU average is under 20% compared to the US at 27 (40% in 2017).

(Source: https://home.kpmg.com/xx/en/home/se...x-rates-online/corporate-tax-rates-table.html)

Keep in mind youth unemployment in Europe is still an issue, especially in Spain. I do agree free education and health care from higher consumer taxes and moderate income taxes would benefit the US but it shouldn't be solely on the opinion of taxing the wealthy and large businesses.
 

Franckie

Registered User
有名人 / Yuumeijin / Celebrity
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
2,902
Reaction score
1,381
Gender
Hidden
Country
United States
Most European countries have higher income taxes but their corporate taxes are pretty low compared to the US. The EU average is under 20% compared to the US at 27 (40% in 2017).

(Source: https://home.kpmg.com/xx/en/home/se...x-rates-online/corporate-tax-rates-table.html)
You are aware of the importance of tax loopholes, yes? You have to look at the effective tax rate. If you do, then you'll find out the US tax rate is much lower than advertised. For example, in 2016 the US Treasury Dept. calculated that the tax rate for corporations was about 22%.

Keep in mind youth unemployment in Europe is still an issue, especially in Spain. I do agree free education and health care from higher consumer taxes and moderate income taxes would benefit the US but it shouldn't be solely on the opinion of taxing the wealthy and large businesses.
Yes, youth unemployment has been a disaster all throughout Europe. The big problem though with Europe right now is the Euro, which is backed by political leadership hellbent on inflicting austerity on the masses in the name of "fiscal responsibility". Spain's housing bubble would have been nowhere near as bad if it had the means of combating recessions as we do in the US and Canada.
 

shionoro

Mangahelper
有名人 / Yuumeijin / Celebrity
Mangahelper
Joined
Jul 7, 2011
Messages
3,750
Reaction score
1,477
Gender
Male
Country
Germany
You are aware of the importance of tax loopholes, yes? You have to look at the effective tax rate. If you do, then you'll find out the US tax rate is much lower than advertised. For example, in 2016 the US Treasury Dept. calculated that the tax rate for corporations was about 22%.



Yes, youth unemployment has been a disaster all throughout Europe. The big problem though with Europe right now is the Euro, which is backed by political leadership hellbent on inflicting austerity on the masses in the name of "fiscal responsibility". Spain's housing bubble would have been nowhere near as bad if it had the means of combating recessions as we do in the US and Canada.
That problem can hardly be only attributed to asuterity tho.
Spain and Italy have the means to get better. And when there was no austerity policy on the horizon, they didn't exactly combat the growing problems they had, too.
The problem is a political one. There need to be reforms. That has nothing to do with austerity.
You cannot compare these countries to the US in that regard. Even if Spain and Italy pushed severe reforms, the countries would still not be as liberal employment policy wise as the US is.
 

Kato756

Registered User
英雄メンバー / Eiyuu Menbaa / Hero Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2014
Messages
1,880
Reaction score
2,467
Age
29
Gender
Male
Country
Brazil
Sorry for butting in, but as a Brazillian, let me tell yah people something.

Don´t tax your people, unless you are a small country (like the Europeans one).

It only creates corruption, makes the poor pay more, and the richer pay less: as it was said, they more often than not find loopholes. Or worse, the "richer" in a country with huge disparity like mine also include, to some politicians, the middle class. Which means that not only the lower classes get screwed over, but also the middle, with the high class keeping thing as it is.

The idea of "We all pay a little so that everyone can have everything" IS nice, and if done well can and will work, however as a guy who lives in a place where it just doesn´t work, I have to say I´d prefer if we never even started it.

Even if all I said does not make you think twice, then ask yourself this.

Do you trust your governament to run business with your and other peoples money?

And also something else that has been happening here in Brazil in the last years

Tax= Money from the people= Money from business, small and large. What happens when the economy goes bad and there is no more money for the basic services like health and education?

Sure I can´t speak much, having lived my whole live here, and only just visiting other countries.
However, the pasture from you guys sure seens greener than mine

(tho to be fair, USA and Europe did fuck u p most of the world trough the 1800-2000 to get where they are now)
 

kkck

Waifu Slayer
神のごとし / Kami no Gotoshi / Godlike
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
46,251
Reaction score
24,902
Gender
Hidden
Country
Fire Nation
Question, why does bernie sanders call himself a democratic socialist? none of the policies I have seen him support actually include government taking control of means of production or anything that the word "socialist" generally entails. Why not just call himself a social democrat? A label more consistent with his positions?
 

M3J

MH Senpai
神のごとし / Kami no Gotoshi / Godlike
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
48,828
Reaction score
17,292
Gender
Male
Country
Akatsuki
Businesses operate based on money. The only way to prevent them from moving is to have lower barriers, such as taxes. Low tariffs also work but Trump seems to ignore that and companies that export from the US are suffering from his illogical decisions.
find ways to make it more expensive for them to move out or export to US?
Question, why does bernie sanders call himself a democratic socialist? none of the policies I have seen him support actually include government taking control of means of production or anything that the word "socialist" generally entails. Why not just call himself a social democrat? A label more consistent with his positions?
For support?
 

kkck

Waifu Slayer
神のごとし / Kami no Gotoshi / Godlike
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
46,251
Reaction score
24,902
Gender
Hidden
Country
Fire Nation
For support?
From whom? Democratic socialist is a fairly wide label but it is also one that applies to a whole range of failed bullshit ideologies. Depending on which one you mean, even trump is a superior alternative. Add to that that not a single country that has ever had this, frankly moronic, label has ever had any measure of success at governing or creating wealth or stability. Its one thing to say democratic socialist and an entirely different one to say social democracy. It does not seem like bernie has anything to gain from using this label, if anything it is vastly detrimental in selling his brand. And to boot, the stuff he supports does look a lot more like social democracy than democratic socialism.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
So seeing how mccain's funeral turned into essentially a huge slap to the face to trump apparently... I have to wonder, is this worth it? Of course, I can understand a dislike for trump as much as the next guy but no matter how much I think about this making the guy's funeral a rebuke to trump seems to diminish the whole thing. Trump ultimately is... a sad and pathetic little man whose most defining personality trait is his capacity for spite and pettiness. For a figure as respected as mccain it seems sad to make so much of this about someone as minuscule as trump. I guess it is a good a time as it is ever going to get to try to make it about civility between parties because that is what mccain tried to do towards the end but damn, they do that without referencing the world's most insignificant leader so much.
 

M3J

MH Senpai
神のごとし / Kami no Gotoshi / Godlike
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
48,828
Reaction score
17,292
Gender
Male
Country
Akatsuki
Support from voters who don't like capitalism or how democrats/republicans are running things.

Methinks they want to rally people as well in McCain's honor, as he had a problem with Trump. Plus ,Trump did attack McCain and called him a loser for becoming PoW.
 

Newkerzy

Registered User
MH中毒 / MH Chuudoku / MH Addicted
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
7,552
Reaction score
5,407
Age
35
Gender
Male
Country
Indonesia
So..... Any takers on who "Lodestar" is?
 

James Rye

Registered User
英雄メンバー / Eiyuu Menbaa / Hero Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2014
Messages
2,019
Reaction score
6,506
Age
37
Gender
Male
Country
Germany
Probably Pence getting ready for being the next president and preparing the creation of the first christian theocracy in the USA.
 

kkck

Waifu Slayer
神のごとし / Kami no Gotoshi / Godlike
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
46,251
Reaction score
24,902
Gender
Hidden
Country
Fire Nation
So..... Any takers on who "Lodestar" is?
Saying its pense makes it seem too... easy. Would pense REALLY be crazy enough to go through with this letter? I mean, it sounds too insane. One way or the other it does seem like it has to be someone reasonably important within trump's white house, otherwise the NYT just made a terrible job publishing an anonymous letter from an irrelevant asshole for no reason. So the possibilities I see:

Pense did it. Even with the loderstar thing this really does not sound like pense to me. He has said insane things of course but he generally seems to approach things in a "business is business" attitude and this letter certainly does not seem like that. And as a presidential bid it seems bad considering it doesn't even appeal to trump supporters aka republicans. If he did it this is

The alternative which makes more sense to me: Some other asshole did it. And it has to be someone important enough to make the NYTs consider this to be a good idea. As for the motive... It could be that pense was being set up. This does sound like something someone in trump's WH would do. A backstab to try and get rid of pense ideally. Pense is after all a mainstream republican while trump... at least on rhetoric isn't necessarily one. A trumpier staff member trying to get rid of someone that might actually be a check of sorts on trump and his trumpier instincts. Bolton maybe? To have more freedom to start wars... Then again I am not sure if pense is particularly war averse to warrant getting rid of.

And then finally... someone not pense just thought this was a good idea and had no other intentions beyond what the letter says. The least likely scenario IMO. But chances aren't zero because this is the WH that thought hiring someone as useless as omarosa would be a good idea. I guess it could also be someone who is about to break from trump's staff and wanted to throw a wrench at the guy.
 

xi0

あの術
最終形態 / Saishuu Keitai / Final Form
Administrator
Joined
Feb 3, 2006
Messages
65,177
Reaction score
30,213
Gender
Male
Country
Pyke
"Lodestar" is just too obvious of a clue IMO. Though, do we think Pence is so full of himself that he wouldn't be careful about what words he would used when trying to appear anonymous? I could buy into that actually, but there's a few examples of his writing from the past and he's not very good at it. Though he probably doesn't do his own writing these days anyway... But the notion that this is somehow helping anything is rather laughable to me. In fact it's only giving Trump more excuses to act out. If the person had any gall he'd go public with his/her allies and resign. That would make more of an impact than remaining anonymous IMO. This person or persons want to be on record working against Trump while working for him... that seems pretty self-serving to me. So whenever this circus destroys itself this person can reveal themselves, write a book, and hope people don't notice all of the times they were complicit with this administration.

Or is this one big distraction from the Kavanaugh hearings propagated by the White House themselves? :lmao
 

kkck

Waifu Slayer
神のごとし / Kami no Gotoshi / Godlike
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
46,251
Reaction score
24,902
Gender
Hidden
Country
Fire Nation
Or is this one big distraction from the Kavanaugh hearings propagated by the White House themselves? :lmao
That... also makes sense. Trump used to use tabloid papers to publish bs stories about people he disliked so him getting one of his cronies to do this wouldn't be that big a stretch. And as a distraction its pretty good. Were it not for his history with tabloids I'd say this is too smart for trump though.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---

To all the people who were worried about other nations laughing at the US president behind his back: Congratulations. Victory is yours. Now people laugh in the presidents face.
 

M3J

MH Senpai
神のごとし / Kami no Gotoshi / Godlike
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
48,828
Reaction score
17,292
Gender
Male
Country
Akatsuki

xi0

あの術
最終形態 / Saishuu Keitai / Final Form
Administrator
Joined
Feb 3, 2006
Messages
65,177
Reaction score
30,213
Gender
Male
Country
Pyke
I don't feel bad at all, I'm okay with them laughing at Trump and at us. We deserve it for even letting a derp get past the primaries, much less win the election despite losing popular vote.
Huh? But neither of us voted for him in either of those elections so how do we "deserve" it?
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
I'm not responsible for the politics of my neighhbor
 

Spirit

Friend
MH中毒 / MH Chuudoku / MH Addicted
Joined
Apr 4, 2016
Messages
8,110
Reaction score
13,058
Age
27
Gender
Male
Country
Australia
People talking of Civil War at the moment. Every time I think the Geopolitical situation has gone off the deep end, America finds a way to plummet down another cliff.
 
Top