But wouldn't that already be covered by existing laws? conspiracy to commit murder is already a crime. I suppose the bit with the federal government is relevant though I am surprised such a thing wouldn't result in a mistrial (or something comparable) to begin with. Even double jeopardy has limits...It isn't just murder, and it doesn't only cover murder either. Lynching doesn't have to result in death. I'll quote the bill here
- (5) LYNCHING.—Whoever conspires to commit any offense under paragraph (1), (2), or (3) shall, if death or serious bodily injury (as defined in section 2246 of this title) results from the offense, be imprisoned for not more than 30 years, fined in accordance with this title, or both.
- (6) OTHER CONSPIRACIES.—Whoever conspires to commit any offense under paragraph (1), (2), or (3) shall, if death or serious bodily injury (as defined in section 2246 of this title) results from the offense, or if the offense includes kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, be imprisoned for not more than 30 years, fined in accordance with this title, or both.
Federal law is separate from state or even municipal laws. Keep in mind that with the Emmett Till case, double jeopardy was a factor that allowed the killers to admit to their crimes and face no consequences. Being charged with a crime in a state court and being acquitted does not protect you from being charged in federal court.
