Ladyboi what....wat?
Aye, I knew that. I was just stating something that has a sad answer to it...No money = no voice
Please tell me that is a mistake like what happened in FL.... some odd years ago?!Black voters and women voters have really harmed Sanders continuously.
h
O c'mon.... she's close enough to one; In my highly un biased opinion.Ladyboi what....wat?
You're such a troll... and yet I can't bring myself to hate you for itPlease tell me that is a mistake like what happened in FL.... some odd years ago?!
O c'mon.... she's close enough to one; In my highly un biased opinion.
What does that have to do with anything? I dislike her as well, but I don't see the point of that brand of ad hominem.O c'mon.... she's close enough to one; In my highly un biased opinion.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
I would not agree with that per se.It is not like having more parties is necessarily a good thing. There are plenty other countries with more parties and their politics are even worst off than at the US. If anything that the US has few parties to an extent shows (or used to show) a degree of political stability and continuity.
REALLY depressing.... gona have to drink now.Hillary also got the state with the most delegates tonight too.
Well to clarify on the specifics of it.... I take half interests in some or all subject maters but don't really like to dive in to the thickness of anything hairy or bushy. (whichever comes first.)He's trolling xD
Most posts I've seen of his... or her? State random shit and then it's him/her going around in circles when someone asks for him... her? To clarify.--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Edit: ooops. Profile says male
They're no more security liabilities than citizens. Citizens can commit just as much crime as undocumented illegals and probably even worse. As far as I recall, only San Bernadino shooters were immigrants, most other mass shooters were citizens (including Breivik).Undocumented illegals are clearly security liabilities. If you don't know who they are or what they are here for or where they are supposed to be then there is a great problem to security. The same is true of refugees, if we dont know who they are truly working for, what their creed is, and if they truly stand for traditional American values, then they are security liabilities and must be either prevented from coming to the country or faced greater difficulty coming. Perhaps they ought to register in a national reigstrar and have increased governmental surveillance placed on them to ensure Americans are safe.
Guns are not security liabilities. They are recreational devices used to play with skeets or to participate in the hundreds of thousand square miles of American wilderness for game. We should not limit access to these devices as they are harmful when in the right hands.
Probably fixed by Hillary? Dunno. Wouldn't be shocked if her campaign played a huge part in preventing people from voting for Bernie, somehow.Went to vote today and they had a completely new paper ballot system. Ever since I've been voting, it's been completely digital. I guess it's fine if there's a paper trail, but after filling out the ballot there was a line to scan it in and the machine had "jammed" and no one working there knew how to fix it. Had to wait around for 20 minutes for them to get to someone on the phone who knew how to fix it. They gave us two options before it was fixed, either wait until it's fixed, or put it in a lockbox and they'll scan it in for you when they're done. The whole thing just seems super tedious and annoying. Not trying to be cynical, but what a joke of a system.
Now you're just hellbent on blaming corruption for everything xD not everything needs a conspiracy theory to prove why good guy sanders is losing.They're no more security liabilities than citizens. Citizens can commit just as much crime as undocumented illegals and probably even worse. As far as I recall, only San Bernadino shooters were immigrants, most other mass shooters were citizens (including Breivik).
Refugees are not security liabilities, or at least they're far less of security liabilities than anyone else. Republican and conservative news sources are full of shit, but according to the refugees and credible sources, the vetting process for refugees is actually pretty stringent and long. Rarely any terrorist would enter the US as refugee, because there's a higher chance of being denied if any agent suspects the terrorist even just a bit. They don't have to do anything, America is safe.
American values? Taking away freedom and rights of homosexuals, women, and transgenders while taking more money from the poor to give to the wealthy? Big companies like Wal-Mart being built everywhere and killing small businesses? People being obsessed with guns and shooting everyone to the point that it's become a horrible joke and rebuttal for other countries when the US pokes fun? Is that what you mean by American values? If so, I'm sure many of them will be able to adapt.
I don't see how guns are not security liabilities given guns have killed countless of kids, women, and men. Guns are meant to kill, they're meant to end lives. If you truly are about protecting America and are against security liabilities, you wouldn't be defending guns when we constantly read in the news how people have murdered others with guns. These devices must be limited, and it's hypocritical of you to be all right with anyone being able to own guns but be against allowing immigrants or refugees when facts and stats have it that more Americans have died by guns than by refugees and immigrants committing terrorism.
You cannot be against murder and claim it's for ethical and moral reasons when you support giving more people unrestricted access to a device that ends life.
Probably fixed by Hillary? Dunno. Wouldn't be shocked if her campaign played a huge part in preventing people from voting for Bernie, somehow.
The Cruz and Fiorina news is the greatest thing I read today.
Gotta love the delusions people like Cruz and Fiorina live with.
Blatant tokenism maybe? It reminds me a lot of McCain picking Palin in 2008, though I don't think Fiorina is anywhere near as dense. She's just a shit human being. I guess that sits fine with someone like Ted Cruz.How exactly is it a good move for ted to run with fiorina? As far as I can tell fiorina got virtually no support and much of the stuff she said were blatant and easily verifiable lies (about the planned parenthood videos). I thought she was seen as some sort of unlikable crazy harpy.... Then again ted cruz is so profoundly hated among the republican establishment that he probably couldn't get one of the "saner" republicans to run with him.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
I think I'd be surprised if he even bothered, given their history. And if Rubio said yes, why would anyone take anything either said seriously given the clear contempt they had for one another?I guess his phone calls to Marco Rubio went unanswered.