Screw you Trump, Marco Rubio doesnt need to drop out the race, not even two minutes into Trump's speech and Im already gnashing my teeth, ugh.
Why dont voters want a by the book mainstream right wing candidate, why go for the extreme evangelical or the extreme businessman with no political experience.
Usually in discourse I find "disrespectful" and "offended" among the most useless of descriptors.
I guess Bernie should be like the Republican circus and talk about their genitalia, face, or other body parts in order to truly be respectful and tasteful.
Screw you Trump, Marco Rubio doesnt need to drop out the race, not even two minutes into Trump's speech and Im already gnashing my teeth, ugh.
Why dont voters want a by the book mainstream right wing candidate, why go for the extreme evangelical or the extreme businessman with no political experience.
/QUOTE]
How out of touch are you? People want Trump because he espouses the ideas they have, from racist ideas to being frank and not supporting political correctness. As for Cruz, he's a religious conservative.
No he's not, he was telling the truth. I mean, GOP debates don't get high rating because people support what the GOP is saying, and I think you can make at least 20 memes per GOP debates, give or take. Plus, Trump and Cruz's ideas and the amount of infighting and cannibalizing that you so conveniently choose to ignore. Do you know how many people from other countries are looking down at America for even thinking about electing Trump? For all the complaining republicans do about Obama tarnishing US's image, the ones voting for Trump seem to have no problem with Trump tarnishing the country's image BEFORE he even becomes president.
Clinton flip flops a lot, but apparently Bernie has said some questionable things in today's debate. I forgot what, but I'm still voting for him regardless.
You feel the Bern?I thought you would be neutral in this election.
And I don't know whether he is going to lose his voter base, aren't most Democratic supporters...whats the word, sympathetic to "minorities" and those who are seen as under-privileged?
The sad thing is he most definitely said this to get more black votes, but this won't even help him with that since with this he generalized all blacks as poor people living in ghettos..
You feel the Bern?I thought you would be neutral in this election.
And I don't know whether he is going to lose his voter base, aren't most Democratic supporters...whats the word, sympathetic to "minorities" and those who are seen as under-privileged?
Hm? What makes you think I'm not neutral? Just sharing quite the major screw up that happened recently.
He won't lose all of his voters of course, but things like these will definitely affect those that haven't decided who to vote for yet. Yes but with this statement he really hasn't praised the under-privileged, he just generalized everyone in a terrible way. I'm calling it now, he will make some speech soon-ish to try and fix the damage.
Oh snap. This might as well have ended with a yo mama joke and trump pointing out his schlonged is HUUUUGE compared to rubio's (and rubio's mom knows it).
The sad thing is he most definitely said this to get more black votes, but this won't even help him with that since with this he generalized all blacks as poor people living in ghettos..
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Hm? What makes you think I'm not neutral? Just sharing quite the major screw up that happened recently.
He won't lose all of his voters of course, but things like these will definitely affect those that haven't decided who to vote for yet. Yes but with this statement he really hasn't praised the under-privileged, he just generalized everyone in a terrible way. I'm calling it now, he will make some speech soon-ish to try and fix the damage.
You're giving the average shmuck too much credit. I don't think they'll see it as him calling them "poor ghetto dwellers" but him "understanding" their plight or another way to see it is "people see what they want to see" As for Hll's comment (unless I read it wrong) I think he meant that he believed bern would remain neutral. Ofc I could just be jumping the gun on this and I am missing your previous interactions so as to better understand why he would say that to you IF he did indeed refer to you with that comment.
Wow, nice cherrypicking dude. That totally was his point!
If you actually listened to what he said there's nothing wrong there, and I'm not one for white guilt or political correctness, or "checking my privilege". The devaluation of someone's opinion based on the randomness of ethnicity or gender bothers me just as much as anyone else. I'm not rich, my family isn't rich, but I can't pretend to know what it is like to live in a legit inner-city ghetto in the way he described. I've never been stopped and frisked because of my skin color or how I was dressed. I can sympathize however I wish to, but that doesn't mean I know what it's like to be Black, much less someone living in a veritable wasteland. That is the "blind spot" he was referring to in his answer to the question. Not that poor white people don't exist or that none live in ghettos. To take only that from what he said or to suggest that was his point is intellectually dishonest.
not really. Hillary has more media attention, dynasty, and being a well-known name who had an advantage from the start. Bernie's rise is due to the amount of support he gathered, which is more admirable than Hillary, Trump, or Cruz's support.
Wow, nice cherrypicking dude. That totally was his point!
If you actually listened to what he said there's nothing wrong there, and I'm not one for white guilt or political correctness, or "checking my privilege". The devaluation of someone's opinion based on the randomness of ethnicity or gender bothers me just as much as anyone else. I'm not rich, my family isn't rich, but I can't prescribe to know what it is like to live in a legit inner-city ghetto in the way he described. I've never been stopped and frisked because of my skin color or how I was dressed. I can sympathize however I wish to, but that doesn't mean I know what it's like to be Black, much less someone living in a veritable wasteland. That is the "blind spot" he was referring to in his answer to the question. Not that poor white people don't exist or that none live in ghettos. To take only that from what he said or to suggest that was his point is intellectually dishonest.
I'll assume that you accidentally missed the detail since you don't strike me as a person who "nitpicks" I read thru a few threads and you (among others) wrote many well thought out responses and opinions.
xi0 was talking about how the other user only took that (that being the comment about how "whites don't know poverty") and acted like that was all bernie meant and nothing else mattered.
Wasn't talking about a politician, I was talking about his post.
Intellectual dishonesty is a common feature of most political campaigns, that's why it's on the media and the individual to wade through that crap. But I will say that people like Sanders and Kasich have the least of it. Their views are their views, their records are their records and there's no real need to "spin" any of it in order to look better. I'm of the mind that if someone really and genuinely took exception with what Sanders said there then that says quite a bit more about them, not him.
xi0 was talking about how the other user only took that (that being the comment about how "whites don't know poverty") and acted like that was all bernie meant and nothing else mattered.
Nah dude, Sanders couldn't possibly know what poverty is like, being born in Brooklyn to immigrants trying to escape the Holocaust and everything. White people don't know what it's like to be poor. kek.
I'll assume that you accidentally missed the detail since you don't strike me as a person who "nitpicks" I read thru a few threads and you (among others) wrote many well thought out responses and opinions.
xi0 was talking about how the other user only took that (that being the comment about how "whites don't know poverty") and acted like that was all bernie meant and nothing else mattered.
Wasn't talking about a politician, I was talking about his post.
Intellectual dishonesty is a common feature of most political campaigns, that's why it's on the media and the individual to wade through that crap. But I will say that people like Sanders and Kasich have the least of it. Their views are their views, their records are their records and there's no real need to "spin" any of it in order to look better. I'm of the mind that if someone really and genuinely took exception with what Sanders said there then that says quite a bit more about them, not him.
Ah, I figured it could also be a genuine misunderstanding. I read that out of context, so I didn't know he actually meant white people can't relate to how it truly feels like to grow up in shitty neighborhoods. But yeah, now that I know the context, I agree with Bernie. He also has a better idea of how to deal with and help people too, just as Obama seems to have. Hopefully Bernie has plans to help.