I couldn't care less what it says about me, at least I know I'm better than Trump or any of his racist supporters. I know how the First Amendment and freedom of speech work, even if you don't. Trump and his supporters have no right crying First Amendment or freedom of speech when Trump has had protesters thrown out of his rallies, and when he threatens people who vote or speak against him.
At least you're not lacking self confidence. No it really doesn't seem like you know the limitations of the first amendment, but hey not like an American needs to know such trivial things. And that last part makes no sense.
Usually I'd think the same, but then there's some Americans that show me that there's some who know less about their own laws and politics than viewers from outside. But yeah you don't have to care about what people outside America have to say if you don't want to. I don't see the merits of that, but suit yourself.
At least you're not lacking self confidence. No it really doesn't seem like you know the limitations of the first amendment, but hey not like an American needs to know such trivial things. And that last part makes no sense.
Like kkck said, this isn't a First Amendment issue. It's a private event but they still didn't vet the people before letting them in either. If people cause disruptions, they're removed. And in some cases at Trump rallies, they're also brutalized by his supporters and are quite clearly encouraged by Trump himself. Cancelling it was their decision. Presidential candidates are protected by the Secret Service.
The only way this would have become a First Amendment issue is if the police shut him down or the owner of the building he was using denied him use or something. Not dealing with disruptions within your own event to a sufficient enough level is no one's fault but theirs. To suggest otherwise is just more dishonesty and spin on the part of the Trump campaign.
Like kkck said, this isn't a First Amendment issue. It's a private event but they still didn't vet the people before letting them in either. If people cause disruptions, they're removed. Cancelling it was their decision. Presidential candidates are protected by the Secret Service.
The only way this would have become a First Amendment issue is if the police shut him down or the owner of the building he was using denied him use or something. Not dealing with disruptions within your own event to a sufficient enough level is no one's fault but theirs. To suggest otherwise is just more dishonesty and spin on the part of the Trump campaign.
Well this convo-line was a few days old so i don't blame you for forgetting. It's not about the cancellation of the Trump rally. It's about all the things the "protesters" did afterwards which people call "them excercising their right of free speech" lmao.
I doubt the people who are unaware of Sander's religious views by now care what they are. This kind of talk is merely pandering. None of those people would be voting for a Jew anyways.
No, there's tons of videos like this. And it isn't like I need to point out Trump stupidity. He's inciting violence on a daily basis, yet we're supposed to care when he cries about protesters. Maybe look at why people are protesting your rallies. I don't remember this level of nonsense even when Bush was running for reelection.
Well this convo-line was a few days old so i don't blame you for forgetting. It's not about the cancellation of the Trump rally. It's about all the things the "protesters" did afterwards which people call "them excercising their right of free speech" lmao.
Which is what? What was done to Trump or his supporters outside of the arena? The police were there and arrests were made. Why are you still crying about it?
No, there's tons of videos like this. And it isn't like I need to point out Trump stupidity. He's inciting violence on a daily basis, yet we're supposed to care when he cries about protesters. Maybe look at why people are protesting your rallies. I don't remember this level of nonsense even when Bush was running for reelection.
The aftermath of the Chicago Trump rally was majorly caused by Bernie supporters. That's also quite a long and substantial video. I guess all Bernie supporters are now stupid people with anger issues? Or to say it in your words: "VOTE BERNIE! ".
Going after people in the other party's primaries is a way to appeal to general election voters as well. But most like anything else, Trump swung first.
Which is what? What was done to Trump or his supporters outside of the arena? The police were there and arrests were made. Why are you still crying about it?
Do you have trouble reading? I wrote what the issue is, yet you still ask me. Vandalizing and attacking cops is not exercising your right of free speech. Why are you so desperate to put it under the rug with "arrests were made". And I'm not even crying about it, you're the one who asked me what the first amendment issue was and I answered. Pls keep it together.
The aftermath of the Chicago Trump rally was majorly caused by Bernie supporters. That's also quite a long and substantial video. I guess all Bernie supporters are now stupid people with anger issues? Or to say it in your words: "VOTE BERNIE! ".
Going after people in the other party's primaries is a way to appeal to general election voters as well. But most like anything else, Trump swung first.
How are they appealing for the general election if they're not even assured their party's nomination? They're acting as if Trump and Sanders already won.
I don't see anything inherently wrong with people interrupting his rallies to be honest. Trump has been hate mongering and carrying an inherently violent campaign for a while. It only makes sense that people would protest against him... The issue here is the violence but even then trump is the one saying his supporters should attack protesters. Trump has been overtly an asshole and a bully, people protesting and calling him out on it is a reasonable response.
Maybe the huge number of "protesters" who were chanting Bernie's name? Well obviously since the videos of problematic Trump supporters matter, we should have videos of all candidates supporters matter too right?
I don't see anything inherently wrong with people interrupting his rallies to be honest. Trump has been hate mongering and carrying an inherently violent campaign for a while. It only makes sense that people would protest against him... The issue here is the violence but even then trump is the one saying his supporters should attack protesters. Trump has been overtly an asshole and a bully, people protesting and calling him out on it is a reasonable response.
I don't see anything inherently wrong with people interrupting his rallies to be honest. Trump has been hate mongering and carrying an inherently violent campaign for a while. It only makes sense that people would protest against him... The issue here is the violence but even then trump is the one saying his supporters should attack protesters. Trump has been overtly an asshole and a bully, people protesting and calling him out on it is a reasonable response.
Do you have trouble reading? I wrote what the issue is, yet you still ask me. Vandalizing and attacking cops is not exercising your right of free speech. Why are you so desperate to put it under the rug with "arrests were made". And I'm not even crying about it, you're the one who asked me what the first amendment issue was and I answered. Pls keep it together.
Because you keep bringing it up as if Trump and his supporters first amendment rights were violated and they weren't. The protesters exercised their right to assemble as well. There were 5 arrests and 2 cops sustained non-life threatening injuries. Protesters were bloodied up and carried away by cops as well. This is hardly an indictment of Sander's supporters or Sander's himself. Sanders isn't up on the podium inciting violence, but Trump definitely is. Unfortunately for you, there's multiple clips of that. The majority of violence occurred between both Trump and Sanders supporters. One side has a candidate inciting violence, the other has actually has a history of peaceful protest and would never suggest attack cops.
How are they appealing for the general election if they're not even assured their party's nomination? They're acting as if Trump and Sanders already won.
Wow what an election expert! There are exit polls that occur after people vote that exist to assess someone's electability in the general election, their likability compared to everyone in the field, assessing the demographics of who is voting for a particular candidate, etc.
Maybe it was some splash from my conversation with you. It seemed like he was implying it shouldn't be going on. But you both seem to have an issue with people exercising their right to assemble. That's a part of the First Amendment btw, which you seem to be so well-versed on.
