Exactly that is the reason why companies can cry about too few available workers in certain fields while a lot of people in those fields are unemployed.
I'm sure people in San Bernardino and Orlando lived their daily lives thinking the exact same thing, but that didn't prevent them from being victims. It's somewhat hypocritical that you would bring up whether and issue effects people's daily lives or not and how that relates to time spent talking about it when you chide others about doing the same thing in regard to other issues as well.
Mmm, from what I recall that's what she said. Not sure if people would lie about that or not. It wouldn't be anonymous though, the woman was supposedly a neighbor from what I remember.
Mass shooting, due to guns. If there was better gun control laws, these tragedies could have been avoided one way or another. Wouldn't you consider the Aurora theater shooting, Charleston church shooting, and Newtown School shooting acts of terrorism as well? One thing in similar (as far as I know/remember): they used guns that were bigger than handguns. Wouldn't you say your two examples could have been thwarted if gun control laws were stricter instead of focusing on terrorism?
Where exactly is the correlation between what I said and the topic of gun control laws? Gun control laws aren't going to prevent terrorism or mass shootings, they would only exist in order deter the mentally ill amd/or to minimize deaths (depending on what the gun control laws would be, of course). If a terrorist can't get their hands on a fully automatic rifle, there will be others willing to make homemade explosives, etc.
It could lessen the fatalities in mass shootings, assuming that the person committing these acts wouldn't have a means to obtain an assault rifle illegally.
Well i mean, there is no terrorist problem in the US when it comes to islamic terror, nor is there a big number of bomb strikes or something like that.
Wat? How can someone say there's not an islamic terrorist problem here?
It's not we're living in Israel or something, but in the 3 years since the Boston marathon bombing, we've had the shootings in Garland, Texas, San Bernardino, and now in Orlando, all carried out by radical islamic terrorists. (and nearly all within the last year).I'm not talking about the exact same people, I'm talking about those dead-set on committing acts of terrorism. If they're motivated to take civilian lives in the name of their cause, having an assault rifle or not isn't the sole determining factor in them carrying it out. No AR-15s available to them? Fine, they'll be like the Tsarnaev brothers and make pressure cooker IEDs and use grenades or something.
This all points to a bipolar personality disorder like his wife claimed. He is the example of your typical american massshooter par excellence: history of domestic violence, two faced, drug abuse andannouncing his violent thoughts beforehand.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
The saddest part about this entire fiasco is that if Clinton was still a member of Obama's administration, she'd at the very least be forced to resign....but because she's the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, Obama has endorsed her and will campaign for her...Haha, lovely political system we have hereSo he bashed Clinton as incompetent, negligent and careless, then proceeded saying she won't be charged and then ended it by saying that the less powerful people who do the same thing will face consequences. Priceless. Are we above the law yet?
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
How are you so sure she would have been forced to resign? To me it looks like the private server is something other people working with her would have been aware of. With that in mind I can't imagine her being fired on the spot for that. If current events serve as a reference she would have gotten a slap on the wrist, a shiny new official email account and a year long FBI investigation that would not produce results. Same as with virtually every other investigation against the clintons.The saddest part about this entire fiasco is that if Clinton was still a member of Obama's administration, she'd at the very least be forced to resign....but because she's the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, Obama has endorsed her and will campaign for her...Haha, lovely political system we have here
Who do you want people to support? Theres many excellent candidates in the Republican party that can appeal to what we need in America, Marco Rubio, Bob Mcdonnell are excellent future leaders of America.
Ah yes, living off the dime of the taxpayer and not doing your job and the taint of corruption charges sure are great steps to being an honest and trustworthy civil servant. As long as someone is more loyal to their party and it's donors than it is to the people they supposedly serve, they have no business holding an elected office.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Why does it matter whether people were aware of it or not? The server existed in defiance of the FOIA. The State Department itself made the content on that server classified retroactively, which means whatever correspondence are on there, they have no business being on a private server. What administration would keep a cabinet member that was under investigation by the FBI? Remember, Obama still had to worry about being reelected back when all of this happened.