Trump would be just as bad as them if he didn't try to counter or fight anything they did though, and supported it instead. He does have power to veto.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Of all the people who i think fucked up when equivalencing clinton with trump, i would give jill stein the benefit of the doubt in not actually knowing what she was saying lol.I heard something that sounded like a cool idea for the muslim registry trump is proposing . straight up savotage! basically everyone simply claims to be a muslim, gets registered and makes the thing moot. how glorious would that be?
Oh, so jill stein is getting behind the whole vote recount thing on a few states. who would have thought she would get behind a candidate as bad as trump this late... maybe now she thinks this whole "white supremacy thing" is actually worst than anything hillary could do....--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
No they won'tThankfully school curriculums will finally be able to openly present materials regarding intelligent design again reinforcing the Christian values of our country.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Why is it good that curriculums can present a lie?Thankfully school curriculums will finally be able to openly present materials regarding intelligent design again reinforcing the Christian values of our country.
Which administration did this happen under?Teaching intelligent design in public schools is in direct violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. Federal courts have already ruled on this and determined that it isn't a science. End of story. Proponents of teaching this drivel to children are the same kind of people that insist dinosaurs are a hoax or that the earth is flat. If you want to associate with that crowd, be my guest, but you have no right to insist anyone's child should be exposed to it in a curriculum funded by our tax dollars.
Where does this put Christian and Catholic Private Schools?Daily reminder that the whole "Christian Values" is a void argument in presence of the Treaty of Tripoli (Article 11). You have every right to practice your faith, but you have no right to force it in a government (Otherwise, the U.S. might as well as turn into another Iran).
Thomas Jefferson's....all the way up until Obama's. But do keep in mind that the judge that heard this case is a Republican, and was appointed to his position in the court by George W. Bush and was unanimously approved by the Senate. So the all too common complaint of "judicial activism" by the religious right doesn't really hold much water, does it? Not that it stops them from complaining about it.Which administration did this happen under?

They're not directly funded by tax dollars (even though religious institutions are in function due to being tax-exempt organizations...but I digress)Where does this put Christian and Catholic Private Schools?
Don't see the point in this, because Private Schools aren't paid using Taxes (or, at least not that I'm aware of).Where does this put Christian and Catholic Private Schools?
It stems from 20th century politicians using the words of John Winthrop, one of the founders of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. A Puritan more concerned with how one interpreted the bible and crying heresy over it instead of the pursuit of actual human rights. Apparently what these people said 150 years before the Revolutionary War matter more to some than what the actual framers of the Consitution said regarding the separation of church and state. One of the more truly confounding things about this country.Daily reminder that the whole "Christian Values" is a void argument in presence of the Treaty of Tripoli (Article 11). You have every right to practice your faith, but you have no right to force it in a government (Otherwise, the U.S. might as well as turn into another Iran).
It's religion, people tend not to make sense when it comes to religion and fictional gods. Ironic thing about claiming Christian values is that most Christians who preach it don't follow it themselves, getting divorces, committing adultery, and other shit.It stems from 20th century politicians using the words of John Winthrop, one of the founders of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. A Puritan more concerned with how one interpreted the bible and crying heresy over it instead of the pursuit of actual human rights. Apparently what these people said 150 years before the Revolutionary War matter more to some than what the actual framers of the Consitution said regarding the separation of church and state. One of the more truly confounding things about this country.
This isn't about whether they're hypocritical or not, it's about why they believe this country was founded on these principles just because a majority of the population was Christian.It's religion, people tend not to make sense when it comes to religion and fictional gods. Ironic thing about claiming Christian values is that most Christians who preach it don't follow it themselves, getting divorces, committing adultery, and other shit.