More people would have been angry and offended if Kamala Harris had been looked over anyway even then RFJ left the Democratic party in Oct 2023 he wasn't going to be an option anyway. He wasn't even going to be in ever state ballot and was not even financially afloat.
We're not whining about not getting their votes, we're mad about WHY we're not getting their votes. I can understand dismissing an American presidential candidate because of their policy positions affecting America/Americans. I can't understand dismissing an American presidential candidate because of the decisions that they aren't willing to make conscerning people outSIDE of America. Unless of course you're Palestinian American... and then it's just a numbers game. There's less of you than there are us. Democracy dictates your cries go unanswered, sorry to say.
" Not to mention, the DNC attendees got covid as well 
Horrible showing, especially if they want to win over never-Trump republicans and centrists/moderates.
How the hell is letting the people that want things like this to happen back in power any better? I don't think you understand that you're justifying making life for everyone worse by saying "Well, relying on Democrats wasn't a perfect defense against injustice so we might as well rely on the bad guys instead." If they think the way you do they absolutely deserve to be blamed and shamed out of the country.
So have American Jews. And you don't maintain fellowship with a nation by cutting your aid to them in order to help their enemy.
THAT SHOULD BE E-FUCKING-NOUGH.Dems this year have shown just how bad they are at politics, especially when their main argument is, "good luck having Trump as president then!
Is the bolded opinion based on Harris' past, or the current reaction to her nomination? Because if it's based on the current climate I'm genuinely curious where you got that opinion from. Maybe that'll be the case once the hype of not being afraid of Biden losing the presidency dies down, but as far as I can see everyone's thanking their lucky stars that she's the candidate.
As I said, that's just my subjective read of the situation, which might be wrong. Obviously democrats are happy that she and not biden is the candidate. But this isn't about the voters that democrats would have regardless of candidate but rather the ones for whom there's a decision to make. And Harris was not too popular to begin with even among democrats so to me it's somewhat of a hard sell that she is set to be a hit with swing voters. Your suggestion that the plan might be for harris to coast on walz' wave doesn't sound like harris can stand on her own here. As vile as trump is the reality is that the wave is his and the rest of republicans are riding it.
Literally yes, provided they were the nominated candidate.
I've seen plenty of blues fight hard against Sanders and Warren, Dems and the left were literally at war with each other in 2016.
Trump has no policy positions, he has populist rhetoric and does what his base wants because that makes them love him. He could do the same for Dems in this hypothetical scenario. Afterall, he's been a lifelong Democrat.
Boeing specifically for a variety of reasons is a company critical to US security interests and it has strategic importance in other areas. Part of the issue with replacing it is that there isn't a US company that can fit into the role or take over by itself. Add to that the number of high playing jobs it has and it's overall roll in the market as a technology monster (a role at which it currently sucks). Airbus is from the netherlands, lockheed martin makes military stuff. My point wasn't that there weren't any other companies in the entire planet that does what boeing does, obviously there are.
I mean, he does have a history of racism and supporting businesses over people. Not to mention, the way he ripped off businesses that his businesses did business with, claiming to not have enough money to pay in full. I highly doubt he'd even think about going liberal
That would not mean they wouldn't get fined and be forced to check the quality of their products better, especially when it affects consumers and their safety.
So did Biden. And Clinton. And I bet I could find examples of Kamala having internalized racism thanks to her hard stance on criminals. And I know he wouldn't go liberal, this is a hypothetical. The point of the comparison is that I would happily vote for a bad guy if it put the good guys on top in the long run.
Boeing has been getting away with shit for the better part of a decade (that I know of at least). It's been years since the first time there were quality issues with boeing airplanes(disclaimer: I don't know anything about other segments where boeing has business). People have died and boeing basically gets away with it with a slap on the wrist. When this first made the news years back it was revealed that the issue with some airplanes that had accidents was in their design. Boeing's solution to this design error was to update the airplane's software to adjust for that design flaw. One of the whistleblowers against boeing was asked in an interview what it would take to get him on one of the company's airplane models (I don't recall which one) and he said (paraphrasing a bit) that boeing would need to ground every model of that airplane and fix every one. The stuff that's going on with boeing and the treatment it gets from the government is not normal.
Yes, but the problem is, Trump would likely try to actually be more openly racist and put forward racist policies as he was doing, and as Biden has been continuing. Hell, he could be the smoke and mirror for Dems to actually support racist policies behind the scenes while pretending to oppose it
From what I've heard, the quality dropped under new management as they replaced people who actually knew shit with people who knew how to cut corners and save money.
x.com
7news.com.au