Unless no one is able bring up one of those undeniable truths I keep my position
Did you mean " Unless one is able ? Because I never thought no one is able to bring up one of those undeniable truths.
Anyway, I think that thanks to the drawing, you can find undeniable truth or at least nearly undeniable. For example, Oda has never said that when Luffy uses Gear 2, he is always sweating that " smoke ". But we all know that it is always what happens because of the drawings.
So, as I said, we can base our reasonings on drawings and sometimes find undeniable truths with them. But do not imagine I think we can always find nearly undeniable truths, that does not work for everything.
To repeat my last example, the animal form of a classical zoan (not an awakened) can only do what a normal animal can do. That is deduction coming from my logic and the drawings. I think it is nearly undeniable too.
Fact:
- The term "Awakened Zoan" ... well "覚醒" (kakusei - awaken) linked to Zoan DF powers ... is new!
- It's the first time we have seen such beasts/Zoan ability users that look like those Guardians AFAIR.
Before Crocodile stated that they are Zoan users, they were called "mutants" like the manticore, weren't they?
Show me some other figure in a manga panel that has the same design characteristics and stats, and then we can see if it's an
undeniable truth.
If they have the same characteristics and stats with the same design, it will mean it is not an undeniable truth with my example about the awakened zoans. So, it is illogic that I show you that.
Anyway, you must consider the fact that it may be not possible with other cases to show you that kind of things because it may not exist. That would mean, they are unique.
nota bene : And about an undeniable truth, it is also easy to said everything is not undeniable : you just have to use relativism. That is why I used nearly before, to prevent that from relativist reactions.
Do you notice they were in animal forms, not in hybrid form or the human appearance ? I think it is undeniable.
Then, I explained the difference with the normal zoans, animals but saying some things they could do in that animal form and that the normal zoans cannot do in their animal form, and neither for the animals. I think it is undeniable too.
Besides, it is a postulate that do not work with design, as the postulate is based on properties of the awakened zoans. By definition, the awakened zoans (can) have a different physic form as they (can) have different zoans - I use " (can) " here because for the moment, we do not know if each DF is unique but anyway, this postulate works with several awakened zoans with different design -
I can give you the same animal of each awakened zoan to show you that they cannot do that. I cannot show you other animal form.
Talking about Monster Chop should be fine - he is incredibly strong, has had empty eyes, and overwhelming stamina. This may be Chopper's awakened stadium on a yet uncontrolled level - uncontrolled because it's forced through three RBs.
Your example is a guessing like the following examples are.
nota bene : each theory has the right to be said. And if they are false, they will be destroyed. Only abductions would survive, even if people are subjectively inclined to think some abductions are not possible (by definition abductions are possible solutions/" truths ".
So, abductions are useful. Besides, with the time, the number of abductions reduces because new conditions are revealed/discovered : that is based on the fact science converges on the long range to truth (that is what legitimates the logic of invention).
Anyway, we are not here to discuss if we trust or not the general heuristic (also named the logic of discovery). So, I stop myself here in that explanation of the utility of " discussion on guessings ".
But asking for discussions on whether or not:
- any other Zoan user (Lucci, Jyabura, Funkfried, Dalton, Kaku, Pell, Chaka, Pierre, Marigold, Sandersonia, Rassuu, Miss Merry Christmas) was awaken or -
- there's some "monster" in the past chapter that might be a Zoan user in his/her awakened state.
That's nothing but pointless guessing.
Of course, that is guessing because this is not undeniable (and I think not even here abductions). As I said not each reasoning can be undeniable.
And personally, I never thought they were awakened zoans.
I tried to find undeniable properties for the awakened zoans. Nevertheless, it would be better, that is truth, to see them as an abduction too (even if I do no think you can find other abductions here that are different from this one)
When I thought some people said wrong things about some zoans being awakened zoans, I explain how, with these properties, it must be impossible. And I said it was possible that Bepo was an awakened zoansas it was compatible with these properties.