- Joined
- Feb 25, 2012
- Messages
- 1,095
- Reaction score
- 905
- Gender
- Hidden
- Country
-
I been lurking here for quite a while now,and the recent discussion about manga ,1999 series and the 2011 series caught my interest.
Whenever there is any sort of book is adapted to a movie ,the fans who read the book will definitely compared it with the movie.If is doesn't live up to the expectation or too much changes were make by the director,there is going to be a lot of complain about it.One example I can think of is Tim Burton's version of Alice in Wonderland,the movie and the book was totally different and the changes he made weren't exactly good.I find the movie to be boring,the actress herself didn't portray the character well. Likewise,when manga is adapted to an anime,there is definitely going to be comparison with both and changes will usually be make so that the anime won't just become "a moving ,coloured version of the manga". A lot of anime like Ouran High school host club,Alice Academy,Law of Ueki,Black cat and Air Gear were different from the manga.The sequence of event were change at some part and filler were added.But the changes resulted in some of them to be more interesting than the manga itself.So minor changes isn't exactly bad.
I read the manga,watch the whole of 1999 series and started watching the 2011 version recently from episode 15 or 16.(I didn't really like the hunter exam arc a lot,so I only started at the later stage of the exam) The art wise, both of the adaptation had their up and downs.In terms of the colours,the 2011 version is more brighter(I like that aspect a lot),but the character design wasn't exactly good (Gon look like a 6 years old instead of a 12 years old and his hair looks really tall) and the colour choice isn't very fitting at some point.(I didn't like the colour of Illumi clothing)As for the 1999 version,the colour was more dull (wasn't really appealing to some)but it fitted quite well for the yorknew arc.But the choice of lighting was good at some part of the event,particularly the part when Hanzo pointed the knife at Gon and his eye have a glow to it,which I think the 1999 version did better than the 2011 series.The character design were better,Gon look much like his actual age and I like the colour choices used for the characters.Illumi looks better in the 1999 versions.So,IMO,art wise, 1999 version is better compared to the 2011 version. I don't really bother comparing to the manga art.When I bought the manga, I remember thinking how terrible the art was at the beginning.So both anime did a better job than the manga in terms of art.
As for the pace of the story and the sequence of the event, the 2011 version did a better job than the 1999 version.The 1999 version was too draggy,my sister gave up watching it because of that.A lot of people also gave up watching before the hunter exam arc was even over due to the slow moving pace.(I can't blame them either because the first 30 episode wasn't really great). The fillers weren't exactly bad. I quite enjoy it.The 2011 version have a faster pace and I'm liking it a lot better.But it still drag on at some part.As for the sequence of events, some changes were made and added in the 1999 version, they added a lot of stuff that weren't in the manga and it wasn't that bad but the change in Gon's mom to be Mito sister was a really bad move.It didn't make much sense for her not to appear in the flashback when Mito was telling Gon about Ging.The flashback only show Ging and Mito which is odd.And if Togashi decided to mention Gon's mother in the manga, and the 1999 version had continued ,there will be a problem.Also,it was stated that Gon stayed with his mother and Ging never visited until she died.So,how did Ging brought Gon to Greed Island?That is a plothole.As for 2011 version,only notable changes were Kaito not being presence in the first episode but i don't blame them for cutting it out because in the manga,he reappear after like 180+ chapters.Most people would have forgotten him by then.So, I'm okay with it.But i think he has to be mentioned in episode 21 or else it will be hard to explain where Gon got Ging's hunter license from.
As for the heated debate over the censorship,I pretty much forgotten how much was censored in the 1999 version.But when I saw a post in another forum that show the difference with how the censorship was handled in both adaptation, the 2011 version surprisingly didn't censor that much compared to the 1999 version.Except for the Killua ripping out the heart part.Only that part bug me.So, 2011 wins.
Now,to the voice of the characters,both are quite good.But I don't like Illumi's voice in the 2011 version.The 1999 version was better.
As for the opening and closing theme,both are good.But the choice of background music is a lot better in the 1999 version.The 2011 version didn't really have the appropriate background music at some point.
In conclusion ,both of the adaptation have their up and downs.Instead of comparing both,I will just enjoy watching the 2011 versions for now.And rewatch the 1999 version once I find the remote the the dvd player...
Hopely it will reach the chimera ant arc.

Whenever there is any sort of book is adapted to a movie ,the fans who read the book will definitely compared it with the movie.If is doesn't live up to the expectation or too much changes were make by the director,there is going to be a lot of complain about it.One example I can think of is Tim Burton's version of Alice in Wonderland,the movie and the book was totally different and the changes he made weren't exactly good.I find the movie to be boring,the actress herself didn't portray the character well. Likewise,when manga is adapted to an anime,there is definitely going to be comparison with both and changes will usually be make so that the anime won't just become "a moving ,coloured version of the manga". A lot of anime like Ouran High school host club,Alice Academy,Law of Ueki,Black cat and Air Gear were different from the manga.The sequence of event were change at some part and filler were added.But the changes resulted in some of them to be more interesting than the manga itself.So minor changes isn't exactly bad.
I read the manga,watch the whole of 1999 series and started watching the 2011 version recently from episode 15 or 16.(I didn't really like the hunter exam arc a lot,so I only started at the later stage of the exam) The art wise, both of the adaptation had their up and downs.In terms of the colours,the 2011 version is more brighter(I like that aspect a lot),but the character design wasn't exactly good (Gon look like a 6 years old instead of a 12 years old and his hair looks really tall) and the colour choice isn't very fitting at some point.(I didn't like the colour of Illumi clothing)As for the 1999 version,the colour was more dull (wasn't really appealing to some)but it fitted quite well for the yorknew arc.But the choice of lighting was good at some part of the event,particularly the part when Hanzo pointed the knife at Gon and his eye have a glow to it,which I think the 1999 version did better than the 2011 series.The character design were better,Gon look much like his actual age and I like the colour choices used for the characters.Illumi looks better in the 1999 versions.So,IMO,art wise, 1999 version is better compared to the 2011 version. I don't really bother comparing to the manga art.When I bought the manga, I remember thinking how terrible the art was at the beginning.So both anime did a better job than the manga in terms of art.
As for the pace of the story and the sequence of the event, the 2011 version did a better job than the 1999 version.The 1999 version was too draggy,my sister gave up watching it because of that.A lot of people also gave up watching before the hunter exam arc was even over due to the slow moving pace.(I can't blame them either because the first 30 episode wasn't really great). The fillers weren't exactly bad. I quite enjoy it.The 2011 version have a faster pace and I'm liking it a lot better.But it still drag on at some part.As for the sequence of events, some changes were made and added in the 1999 version, they added a lot of stuff that weren't in the manga and it wasn't that bad but the change in Gon's mom to be Mito sister was a really bad move.It didn't make much sense for her not to appear in the flashback when Mito was telling Gon about Ging.The flashback only show Ging and Mito which is odd.And if Togashi decided to mention Gon's mother in the manga, and the 1999 version had continued ,there will be a problem.Also,it was stated that Gon stayed with his mother and Ging never visited until she died.So,how did Ging brought Gon to Greed Island?That is a plothole.As for 2011 version,only notable changes were Kaito not being presence in the first episode but i don't blame them for cutting it out because in the manga,he reappear after like 180+ chapters.Most people would have forgotten him by then.So, I'm okay with it.But i think he has to be mentioned in episode 21 or else it will be hard to explain where Gon got Ging's hunter license from.
As for the heated debate over the censorship,I pretty much forgotten how much was censored in the 1999 version.But when I saw a post in another forum that show the difference with how the censorship was handled in both adaptation, the 2011 version surprisingly didn't censor that much compared to the 1999 version.Except for the Killua ripping out the heart part.Only that part bug me.So, 2011 wins.
Now,to the voice of the characters,both are quite good.But I don't like Illumi's voice in the 2011 version.The 1999 version was better.
As for the opening and closing theme,both are good.But the choice of background music is a lot better in the 1999 version.The 2011 version didn't really have the appropriate background music at some point.
In conclusion ,both of the adaptation have their up and downs.Instead of comparing both,I will just enjoy watching the 2011 versions for now.And rewatch the 1999 version once I find the remote the the dvd player...
Hopely it will reach the chimera ant arc.





