Re: Mafia Game 32 - Eyeshield21 - Day 4
Then this game is tied up. There is one more mafia member (if 4 is the max) and one serial killer. Mazino is lying about detective, gnut is lying about being a spy. Matzik can confirm my role as mason, if she turns up. Otherwise I lockvoted on Mazino, so there's already a vote there. I suggest going with him and killing gnut the next phase.
yeah 1 mafia boss and 1 serial killer remaining. let's do some analysis, logic will answer. so far i was lazy to do it
now let's say mazino is not lying about being detective. we know one between imp and gnut is lying. now let's say xnut is innocent
if he's sane, gnut mafia boss and imp townie he would've gotten:
gnut -innocent
imperium -innocent
xnut - innocent
if he's sane, imp mafia boss and gnut townie:
gnut -innocent
imperium -innocent
xnut- innocent
if he's insane, gnut mafia boss and imp townie:
gnut - guilty
imp -guilty
xnut - guilty
if he's insane, imp mafia boss:
gnut - guilty
imp -guilty
xnut - guilty
so basically if imp or gnut come out as the mafia boss then that mean mazino is lying. mazino result are only possible if imp or gnut 3rd party.
if he's sane and gnut 3rd party:
gnut - guilty
imp -innocent
xnut - innocent
that the result he got but then if imp is innocent and mason, his version contradict mazin being detective so that's not possible
if he's sane and imp 3rd party:
gnut - innocent
imp - guilty
xnut - innocent
if he's insane and gnut 3rd party:
gnut -innocent
imp - guilty
xnut - guilty
if he's insane and imp 3rd party:
gnut -guilty
imp - innocent
xnut - guilty
so far i considered xnut being innocent. now let's redo the tables with imp or gnut being 3rd party and xnut mafia boss:
if he's sane and imp 3rd party xnut mafia boss:
gnut - innocent
imp - guilty
xnut - innocent
if he's sane and gnut 3rd party xnut mafia boss:
gnut - guilty
imp - innocent
xnut - innocent
if he's insane and gnut 3rd party xnut mafia boss:
gnut -innocent
imp - guilty
xnut - guilty
if he's insane and imp 3rd party xnut mafia boss:
gnut -guilty
imp - innocent
xnut - guilty
now let's redo the tables with imp or gnut being the mafia boss and xnut 3rd party:
if he's sane and imp mafia boss xnut 3rd party:
gnut - innocent
imp - innocent
xnut - guilty
if he's sane and gnut mafia boss xnut 3rd party:
gnut - innocent
imp - innocent
xnut - guilty
if he's insane and gnut mafia boss xnut 3rd party:
gnut -guilty
imp - guilty
xnut - innocent
if he's insane and imp mafia boss xnut 3rd party:
gnut -guilty
imp - guilty
xnut - innocent
I highlighted in green the result mazino got
only one case is possible if mazino is not lying: xnut mafia boss and xnut 3rd party.
but then there is a big contradiction: if mazino is not lying then Imp is innocent and imp telling the truth contradict mazino being detective. so my conclusion imp is telling the truth.
mazino and gnut guilty.
i didnt take into consideration mentor/mentee role cause i believe we simply have a serial killer. otw all this is wrong.