So what is your point?
So in an all-out-fight(brawl) he will still loose? Why? Last time I READ the manga strongest swordsman =/= strongest person.
http://www.mangareader.net/103-2341-12/one-piece/chapter-234.html
We haven't seen Shanks fight yet, just defend. SO if you base all his abilty based on that. Go ahead.
Don't see your point.
No you're wrong. That's no indications for him beating or being stronger than most of the yonkous. Zoro is aiming for the swordsman top, not the seat of the strongest person.
Well if Shanks only fights with swords.. which we don't know. We haven't seen him fight, only defend with his sword. Until I or we see him fight we can't make that conclusion.
I'm not denying he can fight with swords, but who says that's all he amounts to? Or that he hasn't eaten a fruit? Your just to hasty with your assumptions.
Whitebeard fought with his bisentō but he fought much without. So there isn't any room for fighters to be able to fight with a weapon and their body or ability (by your logic)? Like WB or Rayleigh?
1. Pirate flags, usually contain bones or swords. It's just a typical pirate flag. Which might give away that he fights with swords.. or sword or with more than just that perhaps?
2. Non-canon, next please.
3. WB is always seen with a bisentō, doesnt make him a pure spear/naginata fighter. No?
4. True, and whitebeard with a bisentō.
5. I guess it's a smarter choice than stopping it with a haki imbued fist?
6. Guess that makes him a very good swordsman.
To be honest, im astonished.. that people claim that Shanks is a pure swordsman after we've seen him so little. For example I don't think Roger only fought with a sword just because we've seen him with a sword. Same goes for WB, Rayleigh, Smoker etc etc