Shounen Naruto by Masashi Kishimoto

Delbi

Registered User
MH中毒 / MH Chuudoku / MH Addicted
Joined
Dec 31, 2007
Messages
8,296
Reaction score
4,368
Gender
Male
Country
Joker
Re: Naruto 674 Discussion / 675 Predictions

There's also Ninjutsu that is almost equally dangerous as the Bijuu are, but you're not going to eliminate a shinobi who's capable of such a feat because you're afraid that he might be controlled somehow in the future that would cause harm to people in general. Obito was a being just as a Bijuu is a being, with enough power to do as he pleases. And what happened to him? He was susceptible to being controlled. Not the type of control that Bijuu are used, but a different type, which is irrelevant anyway. So yeah, are you gonna eliminate every Uchiha born just because he might turn out to be another Madara or Obito? No, you won't.
And as I've said, Sasuke and Obito should die. The Biju shouldn't be exiled killed just because of what they can do, but what they have already done. These creatures outside of when they were controlled killed people despite knowing that wasn't what they were supposed to do. They in some instances tortured the children they were contained inside. They had their chance and they ruined it. You can forgive some crimes but not mass murder.

No, Madara wouldn't ever make a turnaround like Sasuke because Sasuke had the luxury of getting a long-term pep-talk with his brother. If Tobirama indeed killed Izuna, there woudln't be a thing in this world that would make a turnaround for Madara, unless Izuna actually spoke to him, as Itachi did with Sasuke.
Madara was in the midst of a turnaround thanks to Hashirama. He was searching for answer, and Tobirama gave him the answers. Then when he went to look at the tablet he interpreted it with a dark heart, instead of reading it the way the Sage intended, and thus was doomed. Madara was capable of being saved, Hashirama proved that, and then Tobirama ruined it.

I don't believe that's the case, as it will be a beginning of a new era. New standards, new laws, new interactions will be set as norms in people's minds. What Sasuke did, Bijuu's pasts, it won't be erased, but it will be remembered as examples of what not to do. As Naruto did with Nagato, he stopped at one point, regardless of Nagato being at fault, and that's how mutual understanding came to mind.
Irregardless justice needs to be served for what Sasuke and the Biju did. Again, allowing them to walk free starts a precedent, that have people begging for their lives if they ever commit awful crimes again and pointing towards Sasuke and the BIju.

If those people aren't punished, then people can just do whatever they want and you have Chaos. If they are punished, their family and friends will take up arms because they felt they were treated wrong.
 

M3J

MH Senpai
神のごとし / Kami no Gotoshi / Godlike
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
48,828
Reaction score
17,292
Gender
Male
Country
Akatsuki
Re: Naruto Hangout Thread v.13 <3

I don't need to prove you wrong. If you're reading my posts, you know this has nothing to do with Naruto except that he's a character that has a small fraction of relevance in this debate. I always have an issue with killing innocents. Why you're generalizing opinions is beyond me.
I've read posts, and no one cared about whether the Juubi or the bijuu lived or not. Some even supported their deaths, and it wasn't until Naruto said no and Sasuke yes that few people started to be against it.

If you have an issue with killing innocents, then why are you choosing to let countless of innocent people die for seven beings that can regenerate?

Because philosophy dictates that morals can be stretched given the possibility of contingencies. Like, if you're not certain that a fat man would even stop the train if you pushed him, you can't push him because you could kill both him and 5 people. That's one contingency that bends a decision that was otherwise instantaneous.

This comparison does work because int his case, the contingency would be another weapon, same amount of victims with different weapon, short period of peace if it happens at all etc.
So, it's moralistic to risk countless of innocent people dying just for beings that can regenerate, who don't truly die? Common sense, morals, ethics, psychologists, and psychiatrists all agree it's better to let the bijuu die, seven beings who can regenerate, over countless of other innocent people.

This comparison does not work because if there are some who would still seek another weapon, they'd be able to get the bijuu. There would not be the same amount of victims with other weapons, there'd be far less, as there's no weapon that's as powerful as the bijuu. This whole "short period of peace" thing makes absolutely no sense, and is one of the reasons why I think you don't even care about the bijuu.

Explain how short period of peace can't lead to permanent peace. If killing the bijuu and killing the bad guys, leading to short period of peace, can't lead to permanent peace, then chances are saving the bijuu won't either, if the good guys do happen to kill the bad guys. The comparison also doesn't work because those six people are humans who actually die, while the bijuu are seven beings who regenerate.

The only way there could be any moral dilemma is if the bijuu couldn't regenerate, that they'd really die. I don't see how you keep arguing against peace being achieved since the bad guys would not be able to get their hands on the bijuu. Madara and Tobi would not have power and would lose, while anyone else afterwards would have to wait. During the regeneration period, Naruto can work to achieve peace. If he can't do it without the bijuu, he would have failed anyway.
What answers?
Tobirama was talking to Hashirama, and Madara seems to have overheard. He assumed the Uchiha would be Senju's lapdogs and have their respect and esteem lowered and treated unequally.
 

Roman

Banned
有名人 / Yuumeijin / Celebrity
Joined
May 29, 2011
Messages
4,052
Reaction score
1,048
Age
37
Gender
Male
Country
Croatia
Re: Naruto 674 Discussion / 675 Predictions

And as I've said, Sasuke and Obito should die. The Biju shouldn't be exiled killed just because of what they can do, but what they have already done. These creatures outside of when they were controlled killed people despite knowing that wasn't what they were supposed to do. They in some instances tortured the children they were contained inside. They had their chance and they ruined it. You can forgive some crimes but not mass murder.


Madara was in the midst of a turnaround thanks to Hashirama. He was searching for answer, and Tobirama gave him the answers. Then when he went to look at the tablet he interpreted it with a dark heart, instead of reading it the way the Sage intended, and thus was doomed. Madara was capable of being saved, Hashirama proved that, and then Tobirama ruined it.



Irregardless justice needs to be served for what Sasuke and the Biju did. Again, allowing them to walk free starts a precedent, that have people begging for their lives if they ever commit awful crimes again and pointing towards Sasuke and the BIju.

If those people aren't punished, then people can just do whatever they want and you have Chaos. If they are punished, their family and friends will take up arms because they felt they were treated wrong.
That doesn't work altogether. If Sasuke as a 16-17 year old kid did serious crimes but will be forgiven, our justification on various things doesn't hold any ground. Just like how Bijuu tortured their JIns at some point. I'm sure they suffered the same fate when they were still infants. But like I responded to RK, they have long generalized human behavior to start worrying about children, specially if they alone were already tortured like children.

Tobirama gave him the truth without sugar-coating, just like Itachi did it with Sasuke. Hashirama spared his life on more than one occasion and Madara had plenty of times to understand Hashirama's way, but he never took them to heart. Madara was aware of Tobirama's words but it was different to actually hear them spelled out in your face which triggered his already alerted power paranoia even more. If that was the only thing that triggered Madara's insanity, his persona was more psychotically jumpy than I imagined.

That all goes as normal but you have to make an exception regardless of said laws if you want to reach mutual respect and understanding because every party acted out of their own sense of justice, regardless of it being right or wrong. Just like Naruto stopped his action against Nagato, even though he was supposed to practically kill him.

---------- Post added at 08:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:42 PM ----------

I've read posts, and no one cared about whether the Juubi or the bijuu lived or not. Some even supported their deaths, and it wasn't until Naruto said no and Sasuke yes that few people started to be against it.

If you have an issue with killing innocents, then why are you choosing to let countless of innocent people die for seven beings that can regenerate?


So, it's moralistic to risk countless of innocent people dying just for beings that can regenerate, who don't truly die? Common sense, morals, ethics, psychologists, and psychiatrists all agree it's better to let the bijuu die, seven beings who can regenerate, over countless of other innocent people.

This comparison does not work because if there are some who would still seek another weapon, they'd be able to get the bijuu. There would not be the same amount of victims with other weapons, there'd be far less, as there's no weapon that's as powerful as the bijuu. This whole "short period of peace" thing makes absolutely no sense, and is one of the reasons why I think you don't even care about the bijuu.

Explain how short period of peace can't lead to permanent peace. If killing the bijuu and killing the bad guys, leading to short period of peace, can't lead to permanent peace, then chances are saving the bijuu won't either, if the good guys do happen to kill the bad guys. The comparison also doesn't work because those six people are humans who actually die, while the bijuu are seven beings who regenerate.

The only way there could be any moral dilemma is if the bijuu couldn't regenerate, that they'd really die. I don't see how you keep arguing against peace being achieved since the bad guys would not be able to get their hands on the bijuu. Madara and Tobi would not have power and would lose, while anyone else afterwards would have to wait. During the regeneration period, Naruto can work to achieve peace. If he can't do it without the bijuu, he would have failed anyway.
There was an issue with it int he chapter discussion thread as soon as Sasuke wanted to get rid of them. I know it because I immediately reacted.

Because you can't sacrifice X innocent lives for another X innocent lives with a probable miscalculated scenario. The trolley problem explains it pretty well, actually.

No, they don't. It doesn't matter if they die or not. The act itself is an execution of innocent lives to potentially save another but without warranty of any actual possibility of desired results.

The comparison does work because an affectionate human being starts to rationalize things differently when the said contingencies come to his mind. The trolley problem is pretty well explained on some sites. It would make sense if you actually understood what I'm saying which is why I stopped replying to you because you're insisting with the same things all over again.

A short period of peace can't lead to permanent peace if your solution of achieving it is used in this war. I already elaborated it. It would be a selfish, immoral, apathic , inhumane act supported and influenced by the authority of power which was present through generations of wars. What I mean by being influence by authority of power? It simply dictates the behavior of ending an innocent life for the purpose of power, be it to escape from it or embrace it. If that actually happened, then the already established understanding between the whole Alliance, Bijuu, the world basically would disappear. The force that makes decisions about said things would once again be power, not mutual understanding and respect. That's why Naruto's doing what he's doing, the "illogical" way, as you might put it.

Simply because the bad guys would still wage war and find another deus ex machina to cause more destruction. It's human nature that the world lives in for generations. The Bijuu might actually be the pillar of change because many expect things to turn out as you want them to, but exactly the opposite is happening, and it's working.
 

kkck

Waifu Slayer
神のごとし / Kami no Gotoshi / Godlike
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
46,291
Reaction score
24,924
Gender
Hidden
Country
Fire Nation
Re: Naruto Hangout Thread v.13 <3

I don't think the biju should be put down here. To begin with the biju are not criminals, they are the victims here. They are the ones that were hunted down by humans and were imprisoned for their power. If they were mindless beasts or something like dogs I would be all for putting them down considering they would be well, beasts or animals, and it would simply be easier than the trouble they are otherwise but that is not the case. Their sentience makes them straight up victims that if anything need protection from others.

Of course, putting the biju down would not really make a difference. Biju don't really die as far as we know even if the jinchuiriki is killed. For whatever reason they simply reappear later on elsewhere, at least that is the implication given so far. So killing them is a moot point and protecting them actually serves a double purpose. You do need to keep tabs on the guys because there is every reason for a lot of people to want their power.

Now, that is not to say there is a need to be impractical here. Within the context of the war it would have actually made sense to put the things down without so much as a shred of remorse. They were going to be used to destroy the world so putting them down beforehand is not that an unreasonable scenario. It would ultimately save lives and spare the biju killing billions along with being trapped within the jubi.
 

M3J

MH Senpai
神のごとし / Kami no Gotoshi / Godlike
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
48,828
Reaction score
17,292
Gender
Male
Country
Akatsuki
Re: Naruto Hangout Thread v.13 <3

There was an issue with it int he chapter discussion thread as soon as Sasuke wanted to get rid of them. I know it because I immediately reacted.
But did anyone have an issue when Kushina wanted to do the same thing to the Kyuubi that Sasuke did to the bijuu? Sorry, but I will remain convinced that it has nothing to do with morals and ethics, but more to do with characters themselves.

Because you can't sacrifice X innocent lives for another X innocent lives with a probable miscalculated scenario. The trolley problem explains it pretty well, actually.
The trolley problem explains nothing given that none of the humans in the example can regenerate. Once they die, they die. Bijuu however, can regenerate. Nor would they mind being killed, since they'd retain their individual identity and come back to life.

No, they don't. It doesn't matter if they die or not. The act itself is an execution of innocent lives to potentially save another but without warranty of any actual possibility of desired results.
It's not execution. The bijuu don't die. This is quite important because it justifies killing the bijuu completely. The ONLY right path that exists is doing something so that Madara can't get to the bijuu, without killing them, but the worst path is keeping the bijuu alive but taking no action to keep them from falling into Madara's hands. That is exactly what happened here.

The comparison does work because an affectionate human being starts to rationalize things differently when the said contingencies come to his mind. The trolley problem is pretty well explained on some sites. It would make sense if you actually understood what I'm saying which is why I stopped replying to you because you're insisting with the same things all over again.
Trolley problem cannot be related to the bijuu problem, for reasons that were stated. Regeneration is important because it removes any moral or ethical dilemma. You're not executing the bijuu, who can regenerate, you're saving them and removing any risk to them. If the bijuu ask to be killed rather than become the Juubi again, would sparing them be moral or ethical, given that they choose to die rather than lose their identities?

A short period of peace can't lead to permanent peace if your solution of achieving it is used in this war. I already elaborated it. It would be a selfish, immoral, apathic , inhumane act supported and influenced by the authority of power which was present through generations of wars. What I mean by being influence by authority of power? It simply dictates the behavior of ending an innocent life for the purpose of power, be it to escape from it or embrace it. If that actually happened, then the already established understanding between the whole Alliance, Bijuu, the world basically would disappear. The force that makes decisions about said things would once again be power, not mutual understanding and respect. That's why Naruto's doing what he's doing, the "illogical" way, as you might put it.
Keeping the bijuu alive and letting them become part of the Juubi would be just as selfish, immoral, and inhumane because they don't want to become part of the Juubi. Not only are they forced to become something against their will, but it also puts countless of innocent lives at risk for beings that don't truly die. The bijuu's lives are "ended" not for power, but to keep them and other lives safe.

Nothing would disappear, and temporary peace can lead to permanent peace. If temporary peace cannot do that, then nothing can lead to peace. Simple as that. My way is similar to Naruto's in that the bijuu would not be killed, but unlike Naruto, steps would be taken to make sure they cannot be taken by Madara.

Frankly, if Naruto can't achieve permanent peace during temporary peace, then he can not achieve peace at all. The understanding between the bijuu and most humans would still exist whether or not the bijuu are regenerating or alive.

Simply because the bad guys would still wage war and find another deus ex machina to cause more destruction. It's human nature that the world lives in for generations. The Bijuu might actually be the pillar of change because many expect things to turn out as you want them to, but exactly the opposite is happening, and it's working.
What other "deus ex machina"? As far as I recall, there has been no other way than the bijuu. The bijuu can't be the pillar of change if they're combined into the Juubi and are subjugating innocent lives. I'm pretty sure the bijuu would understand why they had to die, and that they prefer it over becoming the Juubi and/or hurting innocent lives.

I don't think the biju should be put down here. To begin with the biju are not criminals, they are the victims here. They are the ones that were hunted down by humans and were imprisoned for their power. If they were mindless beasts or something like dogs I would be all for putting them down considering they would be well, beasts or animals, and it would simply be easier than the trouble they are otherwise but that is not the case. Their sentience makes them straight up victims that if anything need protection from others.

Of course, putting the biju down would not really make a difference. Biju don't really die as far as we know even if the jinchuiriki is killed. For whatever reason they simply reappear later on elsewhere, at least that is the implication given so far. So killing them is a moot point and protecting them actually serves a double purpose. You do need to keep tabs on the guys because there is every reason for a lot of people to want their power.

Now, that is not to say there is a need to be impractical here. Within the context of the war it would have actually made sense to put the things down without so much as a shred of remorse. They were going to be used to destroy the world so putting them down beforehand is not that an unreasonable scenario. It would ultimately save lives and spare the biju killing billions along with being trapped within the jubi.
They aren't really being put down, they regenerate. They don't truly die. I even told Roman I agree that the bijuu should ultimately live, and that the problem lies with bad people using them for war and stuff.

But the issue here isn't bijuu in general. It's the war, it's Madara and making sure his plans don't succeed, and risking the lives of innocent people. That's the only reason Naruto's way and inaction is full of folly. At least Sasuke's way is action.
 

Roman

Banned
有名人 / Yuumeijin / Celebrity
Joined
May 29, 2011
Messages
4,052
Reaction score
1,048
Age
37
Gender
Male
Country
Croatia
Re: Naruto Hangout Thread v.13 <3

But did anyone have an issue when Kushina wanted to do the same thing to the Kyuubi that Sasuke did to the bijuu? Sorry, but I will remain convinced that it has nothing to do with morals and ethics, but more to do with characters themselves.


The trolley problem explains nothing given that none of the humans in the example can regenerate. Once they die, they die. Bijuu however, can regenerate. Nor would they mind being killed, since they'd retain their individual identity and come back to life.


It's not execution. The bijuu don't die. This is quite important because it justifies killing the bijuu completely. The ONLY right path that exists is doing something so that Madara can't get to the bijuu, without killing them, but the worst path is keeping the bijuu alive but taking no action to keep them from falling into Madara's hands. That is exactly what happened here.


Trolley problem cannot be related to the bijuu problem, for reasons that were stated. Regeneration is important because it removes any moral or ethical dilemma. You're not executing the bijuu, who can regenerate, you're saving them and removing any risk to them. If the bijuu ask to be killed rather than become the Juubi again, would sparing them be moral or ethical, given that they choose to die rather than lose their identities?


Keeping the bijuu alive and letting them become part of the Juubi would be just as selfish, immoral, and inhumane because they don't want to become part of the Juubi. Not only are they forced to become something against their will, but it also puts countless of innocent lives at risk for beings that don't truly die. The bijuu's lives are "ended" not for power, but to keep them and other lives safe.

Nothing would disappear, and temporary peace can lead to permanent peace. If temporary peace cannot do that, then nothing can lead to peace. Simple as that. My way is similar to Naruto's in that the bijuu would not be killed, but unlike Naruto, steps would be taken to make sure they cannot be taken by Madara.

Frankly, if Naruto can't achieve permanent peace during temporary peace, then he can not achieve peace at all. The understanding between the bijuu and most humans would still exist whether or not the bijuu are regenerating or alive.


What other "deus ex machina"? As far as I recall, there has been no other way than the bijuu. The bijuu can't be the pillar of change if they're combined into the Juubi and are subjugating innocent lives. I'm pretty sure the bijuu would understand why they had to die, and that they prefer it over becoming the Juubi and/or hurting innocent lives.
Who cares if anyone had an issue with it? I know I did. You're debating with me, not the rest of the world. Stop finding irrelevant excuses.

Regeneration is the contingency that alters the decision and the state of mind, as I keep saying. Along with that, it also alters your logic in which a permanent peace can't be established if we accept the possibility of another Madara appearing and using them again.

It is execution if you decide to kill a life. It's that simple. That's why it's even the question of morals and ethics. Bijuu's regeneration is simply irrelevant here. The decision that impacts people's hearts and minds is what matters because that decision shapes future states of mind and behavior, as I keep saying.

This comment exactly explains that you didn't understand what I said. A fat man in trolley problem is the Bijuu. A contingency is here a possibility of which a fat man is pushed on the train tracks, trying to save 5 other lives, but it doesn't succeed in stopping the train entirely, ending up killing the fat man and those 5 other lives. Equal to that, even if you kill the Bijuu, the contingency is them regenerating and becoming a possible threat once again, speaking from your point of view (because I don't think they'll ever be threat again). Which is why permanent peace can never be accomplished in the manner that you'd want to. Do you see the connection?

Not, it's not. You're talking about the risk, not a decision. That's a huge difference. They are able to fight for their lives and have a cause. As opposed to becoming a sacrifice without even them having any saying in it.

Like I said, them becoming a Juubi is a possibility or a risk, not a definite outcome. Naruto thinks it's better for Bijuu to try and defend themselves and the people, instead of kill them and continue the cycle like it never stopped. It's simply a paranoia that would drive you to make heartless and immoral decisions because authority of power forced you to do it, which I said many many times.
 

Delbi

Registered User
MH中毒 / MH Chuudoku / MH Addicted
Joined
Dec 31, 2007
Messages
8,296
Reaction score
4,368
Gender
Male
Country
Joker
Re: Naruto 674 Discussion / 675 Predictions

That doesn't work altogether. If Sasuke as a 16-17 year old kid did serious crimes but will be forgiven, our justification on various things doesn't hold any ground. Just like how Bijuu tortured their JIns at some point. I'm sure they suffered the same fate when they were still infants. But like I responded to RK, they have long generalized human behavior to start worrying about children, specially if they alone were already tortured like children.
Again, I said Sasuke shouldn't be forgiven, the justification for allowing people to live and not pay for their crimes is moronic as it gives people a free pass to do what they want so long as they say they will change. Allowing Naruto to be the judge, jury and executioner of people is stupid. Even if he can read their hearts, we have seen, people change for both the good and the worse. You run a risk of letting people run a muck and then hiding behind a forgiveness doctrine that is doomed to fail because it is both naive and impractical.

The Biju had their chance. They knew better from the start of things thanks to the Sage. You don't not punish people just because they are victims, not when their crimes are this great. There is no evidence in our own world that people should be let free thanks to circumstances when they have committed the the crimes Sasuke, Obito, Madara and the Biju have. And it is not just the type of crimes, but the scale of them. We are talking mass murder, treason, torture, etc.

Tobirama gave him the truth without sugar-coating, just like Itachi did it with Sasuke. Hashirama spared his life on more than one occasion and Madara had plenty of times to understand Hashirama's way, but he never took them to heart. Madara was aware of Tobirama's words but it was different to actually hear them spelled out in your face which triggered his already alerted power paranoia even more. If that was the only thing that triggered Madara's insanity, his persona was more psychotically jumpy than I imagined.
It wasn't the thing that triggered Madara's insanity but broke his sanity yet again. His insanity was initially triggered by all the fighting and the deaths of his brother and clansmen. He then began to heal thanks to Hashirama but all that progress was destroyed thanks to Tobirama, who not only thought Madara was bad, but thought his innocent clan mates were as well. You seem to forget that part.

Orochimaru already pointed out the flaws in Tobirama's logic, as did Hashirama. Tobirama made a mistake in what he did and in the end it cost his village. While it's certainly possible that Madara would have went batshit anyway for another reason, Tobirama did nothing but make matters worse.
That all goes as normal but you have to make an exception regardless of said laws if you want to reach mutual respect and understanding because every party acted out of their own sense of justice, regardless of it being right or wrong. Just like Naruto stopped his action against Nagato, even though he was supposed to practically kill him.
The situation with Naruto and Nagato was so stupid and unbelievable it makes me angry even talking about it. If Nagato hadn't died, there is no way in hell he would have lived. Even if he revived everyone and lived, he still destroyed the fucking village and killed tons of other people. Naruto would in no way have convinced everyone he should go free. Naruto was wrong to let him live. The only thing Naruto did right was not give into his hatred. But not giving into hatred doesn't mean you can't had out justice. Nagato still deserved to die, just not via vengeance.
 

Rikudou King

Mangahelper
伝説メンバー / Densetsu / Legendary Member
Mangahelper
Joined
Jul 6, 2009
Messages
11,634
Reaction score
6,367
Gender
Male
Country
United States
Re: Naruto Hangout Thread v.13 <3

It's not suggested anywhere since it's common sense. Some with too much power think they can do whatever they please. Cause is the control and the authority over one's own power or a Bijuu for example, while the effect is the destruction and chaos. I agree, it's not simple, it's complicated. That's why it lasted ever since Indra and Ashura started their quarrel. The types of people won't matter and the comparison of state of minds can't be possible after the war is over. Too much change will take place because of the people's unity.
Not seeing that. Just because someone say, wants stricter gun laws, doesn't mean they're fine with not treating crazy people in the first place. It's not an either/or situation. You can both try and change the world, while at the same time taking steps to keep dangerous items out of unstable hands.

If every village had a Jinchuuriki, I don't think only a few saw them as weapons. Sure they did want interaction. Why do you think they'we been looking for another Hagormo until now? Regardless, being treated like a tool implies not only absence of human interaction but complete deniability of freedom. Man, anyone would for themselves if they think injustice was did to them. You also have to take into consideration that they generalized people's behavior since the majority of them treated them like crap. The standard of Narutoverse is clearly wrong as Naruto is trying to change it.
Only the leaders would have seen them as weapon, verses the majority of the citizens. We've seen this both in Konoha and Suna, where the leaders and a few others think one way while the rest thought of them as monsters. Waiting for another to appear is far different then actively wanting human interaction. If such was the case, then they surely wouldn't have rejected the attempts made to befriend them. And not in this case. The summons are considered tools, yet there is no denial of freedom there. Heck, ninjas themselves are seen as tools, yet they are still free within reason. No, I don't think anyone would harm innocent children, who was pretty much in the same situation and being treated just as bad, just because of an injustice. There's a limit to what can be justified. And Naruto himself has had no issue with eliminating said treats, as he too had no problem attempting to destroy the Bijuu-filled Juubi before Sasuke arrived.

We don't need it to be said. You can downright assume it since he's the one who started the authority of power. Madara is his reincarnation. Maybe he wasn't as crazy as Madara is, but the similarity is certainly there.
Authority of power? All he maintained was that with enough power, anything was possible. There is nothing at all supporting the idea that he wanted to rule over people, or use power to do so. That sort of thinking was of Kaguya, as the Rikudou Sennin specifically called out, and who he compared Madara to.

There's no justification for killing anyone, much less deciding another's life for the sake of hope that might not be realized, as in this case. They were once infants too and probably received the same treatment. Like I said, they generalized people's behavior. Just because they tried and without results is another reason they generalized their behavior. That's why Kurama needed 600 chapters to actually start believing in Naruto's words.
Then their past actions say all there need to be about whether they should be kept around. And it's highly unlikely that they would have recieved the same treatment as "infants". Aside from the Rikudou Sennin being the one who likely raised them, there isn't any indication that they had any negative human experience before the creation of the villages. The fact that they would generalize and judge all humans on the bad actions of one person, in the Kyuubi's case, doesn't really help the case against eliminating them, since it would only take a single bad action to once again turn them against people and make them a threat again.

Finding it entertaining only adds up to his insanity. Not to mention killing because of entertainment.
The point is that him being insane is far different from killing anyone who crosses his path. He has actually shown that he enjoys people opposing him, like with the Gokages, cause it allows him to fight and make war like he wants.

I disagree. I would feel tortured if I was locked inside a person, being not able to do shit. No, it doesn't matter since the X years passed before they found Naruto after Hagoromo. They didn't do bad things just because they were sealed. We already covered the people's behavior part.
Prison itself hasn't and isn't considered torture. Considering they are nothing more then a mass of chakra, they would have had nothing to do in the first place. Not to mention that we've seen the mental realm doesn't physically detain them. And yeah, that does appear to have been their reason. As mentioned, the only one who was treated badly before being sealed was the Kyuubi. Madara didn't have anything to do with the other Bijuus, they were held by Hashirama, who is not that type of person. After that, the only people the Bijuus would have interacted with would have been their hosts, a bunch of children, until they broke out. So the human behavior claim doesn't factor in here.

A leader shapes people's opinion about something. If a leader thinks it's a tool, a shinobi will follow his example. That's how it's always done. The majority isn't gonna prevent minority, I agree, but like I said, the chances of it are sure as hell gonna decrease a lot after this war.
No. Sarutobi attempted to get everyone to see Naruto as a person, yet that didn't stop the majority of people from seeing him as a monster for years. Madara attempted to convince his clan that they would end up used by Konoha, and they didn't believe him until it actually happen, decades later. Just because a leader believes something doesn't mean the people will believe it too. And the point has been that it would only take a single person to screw everything up again. Better to ensure that they can't be used as weapons then to simply pin hope on it not happening again.
 

M3J

MH Senpai
神のごとし / Kami no Gotoshi / Godlike
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
48,828
Reaction score
17,292
Gender
Male
Country
Akatsuki
Re: Naruto Hangout Thread v.13 <3

Who cares if anyone had an issue with it? I know I did. You're debating with me, not the rest of the world. Stop finding irrelevant excuses.
I'm basing it on the argument that I'm looking at.

Regeneration is the contingency that alters the decision and the state of mind, as I keep saying. Along with that, it also alters your logic in which a permanent peace can't be established if we accept the possibility of another Madara appearing and using them again.
There will be another Madara that will appear, whether in Naruto's generation, next generation, or generations after. The difference is, the world would hopefully be working together to prevent the successor from succeeding in his plans, especially if they work with the bijuu. By either killing the bijuu or saving them and removing them from Madara's accessibility, the bijuu are safe and peace can be established. However, peace is possible because the bad guys won't be there to interfere, and the bijuu can be safely out of the way until majority of the shinobi are enlightened. That way, any possible strays can't go after the bijuu until they realize the bijuu are good and have feelings.

It is execution if you decide to kill a life. It's that simple. That's why it's even the question of morals and ethics. Bijuu's regeneration is simply irrelevant here. The decision that impacts people's hearts and minds is what matters because that decision shapes future states of mind and behavior, as I keep saying.
Yes, that would be true only if the bijuu truly died. Otherwise it's not execution because they'd regenerate and still live. It's not irrelevant at all because you're not sacrificing lives, you're removing the bijuu one way or another to save countless of lives that CAN'T come back. There's no moral or ethical dilemma here unless it's somehow revealed that the bijuu truly do die.

How does it shape the future states of mind and behavior? It's not like Naruto's gonna suddenly go all "sacrifice everyone for the greater good!" He also can convince people to change their views, and if they can't, then there was never a chance even with sparing the bijuu.

This comment exactly explains that you didn't understand what I said. A fat man in trolley problem is the Bijuu. A contingency is here a possibility of which a fat man is pushed on the train tracks, trying to save 5 other lives, but it doesn't succeed in stopping the train entirely, ending up killing the fat man and those 5 other lives. Equal to that, even if you kill the Bijuu, the contingency is them regenerating and becoming a possible threat once again, speaking from your point of view (because I don't think they'll ever be threat again). Which is why permanent peace can never be accomplished in the manner that you'd want to. Do you see the connection?
I don't think they'd become a threat again, whether they were killed by the good guys or not. They'd thank Naruto for making the right decision, and Naruto would make it so that the bijuu are never used for selfish reasons, so everyone bar few people get along.

Again, trolley problem does not work. Someone will die in the trolley problem, but in the bijuu problem, human and bijuu lives are at risk if the bijuu are spared and kept close to the bad guys who want them.

If permanent peace can't be accomplished from temporary peace, then same goes for your way as well.

Not, it's not. You're talking about the risk, not a decision. That's a huge difference. They are able to fight for their lives and have a cause. As opposed to becoming a sacrifice without even them having any saying in it.
If it makes you feel better, they're not being sacrificed, they're being saved, given none of them wants to be part of the Juubi again. They tried fighting for their lives and lost because Naruto was unable to protect them.

Like I said, them becoming a Juubi is a possibility or a risk, not a definite outcome. Naruto thinks it's better for Bijuu to try and defend themselves and the people, instead of kill them and continue the cycle like it never stopped. It's simply a paranoia that would drive you to make heartless and immoral decisions because authority of power forced you to do it, which I said many many times.
It became a definite outcome. It was a huge, unnecessary risk that brought the two heroes to the brink of death and made the bijuu do something that they did not want to do.

Naruto is an idiot because he should have at least found a way to make sure Madara didn't get his evil hands on the bijuu. Killing the bijuu does not guarantee the cycle would continue nor would it drive people to make heartless and immoral decisions. That's just a limited way of thinking.
 

Rikudou King

Mangahelper
伝説メンバー / Densetsu / Legendary Member
Mangahelper
Joined
Jul 6, 2009
Messages
11,634
Reaction score
6,367
Gender
Male
Country
United States
Re: Naruto Hangout Thread v.13 <3

Not sure who you guys were talking about but if his target is the one in his current fight, Madara I don't think he has anything "in spade" aside for Naruto and Sasuke to hold Madara down as he impales him :P
Was just talking in general. I don't expect Kakashi to have any role against Madara. He was barely any use even with his Sharingan.

Yeah the third is something else though, the question is can he pull the same thing off.

The third can reduce the amount of fingers he's using and in contrast to Kakashi, I remember saying that Chidori's weakness without the Sharingan would let anyone be able to escape and counter-attack and even if they do on the first, you can be sure that he won't be hurt unless someone's got to know how he got that scar on his chest. Well simply put, Kakashi doesn't have a defence as strong as the third raikage's.
He should, he was capable of it even before having the Sharingan. It's not really "anyone", it would only be someone as fast or faster, which is only a select handful even now. And the faster would still be he case even with the Sharingan.
 

KiSwordsman

Registered User
有名人 / Yuumeijin / Celebrity
Joined
Dec 12, 2008
Messages
3,457
Reaction score
1,211
Gender
Male
Country
United States
Re: Naruto Hangout Thread v.13 <3



I just wanna put this here because it's both awesome and ridiculous. I'm pretty sure Obito's gonna be joining the line up soon too. lol

---------- Post added May 20, 2014 at 03:55 PM ---------- Previous post was May 19, 2014 at 04:47 PM ----------

Hmm. It's kinda like how one might blame god for the existence of Hitler but only blame their fellow interstate-driver for their own existence if they, say, cut them off in traffic.
Well think about it, is not really Sasuke's fault that Danzo decided to show himself to be an ass in front of all the other world leaders. Thereby making any consequence for killing the man nonexistent. That's on Kishimoto. Hell, the bullshit way that Danzo got caught was on Kishimoto as well.

It's not really Sasuke's fault that he's going to get a pass after this war due to the fact that the past Hokage came to help. However, that would be a major reason for pardoning him. For if it was not for his decision they would have stayed in the leaf and destroyed it. And everyone else on the planet would be dead. These are things you can't put on the character because the good that comes out of the actions for said character was not the character's intention. This is all on the author. Kishimoto made these loopholes so that Sasuke coming back and trying to be the leader of the village has more than zero legs to stand on. That's what irritates me about this whole situation. Sasuke doesn't have to worry about being held accountable for his past actions because his current actions make up for it. So much so that he might become the leader of the leaf. That's the problem. Personally, I think that's bullshit. However, it doesn't matter what I think. I'm just aguy on the Internet.
 
Last edited:

ninjabot

Registered User
MH中毒 / MH Chuudoku / MH Addicted
Joined
Dec 20, 2006
Messages
8,247
Reaction score
3,239
Age
41
Gender
Male
Country
United States
Re: Naruto Hangout Thread v.13 <3

KiSwordsman said:
These are things you can't put on the character because the good that comes out of the actions for said character was not the character's intention.
Actually, you can put it on Sasuke and it'd be 100% legit.

Sasuke's intention was to find out the truth in order to help him decide whether he should destroy Konoha or not. The answers he received made him choose to protect Konohagakure rather than destroy it. And Orochimaru, who had complete control over all the Edokage except Hashirama (who he would've just canceled his summoning anyway if he tried to fight them) admitted that he would aid Sasuke no matter what he chose. Therefore, the Edokage coming to the battlefield to save everyone is literally, 100% due to Sasuke's choice.

Not his ability. But by his choice. Had he said "No, we're destroying Konoha", Orochimaru would've agreed, canceled Hashirama's summoning, and then used the rest of the Kage to destroy the village. Hell, even if someone in the alliance were to pipe up and say "I bet he was gonna use the Kage to kill us all!", Orochimaru could simply say "No, he simply wanted to talk to them. And once he received the answers he was looking for, he opted to save the lot of you."

So yeah. It was his intention to protect Konohagakure. His allies aided in doing so. Juugo with his natural energy. Karin with her chains. Orochimaru with his Edo Tensei. But it was all done in Sasuke's name, due to Sasuke's decision, following Sasuke's intentions. You could've picked the Danzou incident and that'd be more accurate as an example of a happy coincidence that benefited Konohagakure, but everything Sasuke's done in the war is purely in the defense of Konohagakure with no asterisks. No caveats. No catch.
 

KiSwordsman

Registered User
有名人 / Yuumeijin / Celebrity
Joined
Dec 12, 2008
Messages
3,457
Reaction score
1,211
Gender
Male
Country
United States
Re: Naruto Hangout Thread v.13 <3

Actually, you can put it on Sasuke and it'd be 100% legit.

Sasuke's intention was to find out the truth in order to help him decide whether he should destroy Konoha or not. The answers he received made him choose to protect Konohagakure rather than destroy it. And Orochimaru, who had complete control over all the Edokage except Hashirama (who he would've just canceled his summoning anyway if he tried to fight them) admitted that he would aid Sasuke no matter what he chose. Therefore, the Edokage coming to the battlefield to save everyone is literally, 100% due to Sasuke's choice.

Not his ability. But by his choice. Had he said "No, we're destroying Konoha", Orochimaru would've agreed, canceled Hashirama's summoning, and then used the rest of the Kage to destroy the village. Hell, even if someone in the alliance were to pipe up and say "I bet he was gonna use the Kage to kill us all!", Orochimaru could simply say "No, he simply wanted to talk to them. And once he received the answers he was looking for, he opted to save the lot of you."

So yeah. It was his intention to protect Konohagakure. His allies aided in doing so. Juugo with his natural energy. Karin with her chains. Orochimaru with his Edo Tensei. But it was all done in Sasuke's name, due to Sasuke's decision, following Sasuke's intentions. You could've picked the Danzou incident and that'd be more accurate as an example of a happy coincidence that benefited Konohagakure, but everything Sasuke's done in the war is purely in the defense of Konohagakure with no asterisks. No caveats. No catch.

I honestly don't see how we are in disagreement. Didn't say that it was not his intention to protect the leaf. I said it wasn't his intention to get pardoned by the entire world for doing so, so yeah. This is going to happen due to his actions. because once again, like I've already stated if it was not for his choice the leaf would be gone, and everyone in the alliance would be dead. Once again, the good that comes for him from his actions were not his intention, it Will just end up working in his favor. He did not do any of this to make up for any of his past actions as a criminal, he did it so that Madara's plans don't shit on everything that his brother worked for.
 
Last edited:

Exodi

Registered User
英雄メンバー / Eiyuu Menbaa / Hero Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2007
Messages
2,213
Reaction score
1,304
Age
36
Gender
Male
Country
United States

narutotheory

Reviewer
英雄メンバー / Eiyuu Menbaa / Hero Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Messages
998
Reaction score
546
Age
36
Gender
Male
Country
United States
Re: Naruto Hangout Thread v.13 <3


---------- Post added at 12:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:30 PM ----------

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Prince Sasuke

Registered User
有名人 / Yuumeijin / Celebrity
Joined
Jun 6, 2009
Messages
3,801
Reaction score
657
Gender
Male
Country
United States
Re: Naruto Hangout Thread v.13 <3


---------- Post added at 12:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:30 PM ----------

I love that stuff!!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

KiSwordsman

Registered User
有名人 / Yuumeijin / Celebrity
Joined
Dec 12, 2008
Messages
3,457
Reaction score
1,211
Gender
Male
Country
United States
Re: Naruto Hangout Thread v.13 <3

I love that stuff!!!
I know right? Lol. That Sasuke, Vegata match was an easy victory for the former mainly because it reminded me just how bad Toriyama treated the latter. Dude got his ass kicked by practically every major villain of the serious after himself. Jesus Christ. Before anyone says anything, he did kick ass. However, it was always short lived.
 

Prince Sasuke

Registered User
有名人 / Yuumeijin / Celebrity
Joined
Jun 6, 2009
Messages
3,801
Reaction score
657
Gender
Male
Country
United States
Re: Naruto Hangout Thread v.13 <3

I know right? Lol. That Sasuke, Vegata match was an easy victory for the former mainly because it reminded me just how bad Toriyama treated the latter. Dude got his ass kicked by practically every major villain of the serious after himself. Jesus Christ. Before anyone says anything, he did kick ass. However, it was always short lived.
Yea lol. Vegeta got served for all the reasons you pointed out lol. He took tons of ass kicking but he's still my favorite overall.. That's how I came up with my name for the forum by combining my two favorites lol.

I think Vegeta rap voice was better than Sasuke's.
 
Top