- Joined
- Apr 28, 2008
- Messages
- 7,007
- Reaction score
- 4,650
- Country
-
This cover was all about Wano huh...
Also is that Kaido's hybrid form?
Also is that Kaido's hybrid form?
Which one? The top right is LinLin and top left is Kaido.This cover was all about Wano huh...
Also is that Kaido's hybrid form?
![]()
I kinda lost track of time... Are we getting the chapter this week?
So you all saw trailer 3 yet of the movie?Pretty sure we are.
-
![]()
What ya mean? Animation been lit for the whole time about it. Both are good.Artwork looks nice, too bad the anime doesn't seem to want to have that type of quality.
Man, just watched it. If Bullet is 100% canon, then I'm hyped to know more. In the trailer he says that he is the only one strong enough to win the tournament or whatever you call it.So you all saw trailer 3 yet of the movie?
On the contrary, I think he has planned a lot. The creativity and the execution, on the other hand, is not the same. Dressrosa is basically Alabasta 2.0. I mean look at the abilities of Doflamingo's henchmen and that of Baroque works. One dude who can explode, another that can alter his weight and a third that can move through the ground. This is what happens when the same brain tells a story for too long. Compare it to Star Wars, where Lucas reintroduced the death star in Return of the Jedi.Am I the only one that feels like Oda has not planned as well for part 2 of the series AS WELL as part 1 (as well is the key here,not saying that it sucks)
Yes, black armament is the focus of Haki on a single spot, several spots or on the entire body. It is black to distinguish it from regular invisible Haki.Are we still discussing if the black armament truly happens or are only a visual mark for the readers?
Because from this page https://www.mangareader.net/one-piece/784/5
i think it gets pretty clear the blackness is the real thing.
Just noticed this, not sure if this was shared before:
![]()
Notice how Luffy's Kimono / samurai dress has the Kozuki clan emblem and a dragon attacking on the background.,
I think you failed to read what I said purposely.Lets say this was possible. Who was supposed to take others down? When you said BMP had to be defeated then it means the entire crew needs to go down.
It's ironic how hypocritical you are here.As for you reasoning, if BM couldn't be defeated then Kaido wouldn't be either. That's where you are wrong. It has nothing to do with Kaido being weaker. Both settings are different. BM resided in a territory, where all the people present where allies. The only rebels were, Bege, Germa66, SHs and Fishmen. These groups had no manpower to take down BMP by themselves. If you want to take down a Yonkou you need a mass number of people helping you take them down. Marineford War is a prime example.
When did I say otherwise? Pulling straw-man after straw-man. Arguing points I never brought up, but answer them as if I brought them up. Intellectual dishonesty once again.Wano is different.
Again, you're twisting things dishonestly again.Oda himself said that Wano arc would be comaprable or greater than MW (iirc), not WCI. Then you also brought up the point that if the author wished to, then SHs could have defeated BMP if a similar situtation to Wano happened, such as someone training Luffy etc.. Yes you are right, if certain factors were there then Luffy could have gotten stronger and take on BM, BUT IT DIDN'T! And how do we know this? When the arc started, Oda's editor said that the WCI arc would be an extremely small one. He even gave a time frame as to how long the arc was meant to be. When you brought up the discussion of Luffy defeating BM, there wasn't enough time to do it anyway.
It's simply common sense. Gear 4th forced Big Mom into using the strongest form of Armament. Only common sense to believe he could damage her.You are the one who claimed that BM used haki to block G4, hence Luffy can beat her.
It's a fact, Fujitora stated that Luffy has the power to take on the Emperors.Gave Fujitora's panel as manga fact, gave Lucci vs Luffy fight as another manga fact, and called everyone delusional who disagreed with you.
Mind you, huge difference in saying win from a narrative stand-point and become Pirate King. What you don't seem to understand isWhen I brought that up, you said SHs won narratively, NO SHIT SHERLOCK! If "narratively winning" is what your entire point was about, then you should have said so. Then let me make a statement as well, Luffy will become PK, I mean narratively he should right? Like how Naruto became the hokage.
Sure you weren't. He was just talking nonsense and the panel was useless. There absolutely was no meaning in bringing up that panel in regard to his strength, and the fact that we know Luffy can get stronger simply if plot requires it.We never called Fuji a liar, we always thought of his words describing Luffy's potential.
Maybe you don't remember, but you said if Luffy cannot defeat BM then beating Kaido isn't possible. I already gave you the reason. Read my post.When did I say otherwise? Pulling straw-man after straw-man. Arguing points I never brought up, but answer them as if I brought them up. Intellectual dishonesty once again.
I am not being dishonest to anyone or myself as you have claimed. Editor said 50 chapters or less, and I believe it because he got the information from Oda. However, it is true that it extended to 80 because the initial estimation was off. As you write a story, various new ideas pop up, resulting in extra chapters but the overall concept stays the same.Again, you're twisting things dishonestly again.
- You didn't know how long the arc would go. So to use that as basis for what could happen is farcical. An arc that was supposedly what, 50 chapters or less became 80. Clearly, editor notes are not reliable, we've known that for a long time now.
however he didn't and we knew that. but you didn't. that's why you are in denial. i have no reason to be in denial because i was right.If Big Mom was meant to go down that arc, she would have, rather, he had her defeated in a different way that still achieved the desired purpose that he intended.
when we had this conversation about Luffy defeating Luffy, it was obvious that the arc was about to end. there was no plot to explore. that is how a story works. they completed all their objective and was on the run.If Wano arc was the arc that was to play out first with someone captive, could well have played out exactly like WCI.
It's simply common sense. Gear 4th forced Big Mom into using the strongest form of Armament. Only common sense to believe he could damage her.
I however never stated he could simply defeat her, I said he could damage her.
You're lying that I said simply based on what we've seen on Gear 4th, that he'd definitely defeat her.
How convenient to forget all the points I made about power-ups and how Oda would do whatever is necessary to make sure the protagonist won in a fight if it was necessary.
How do you expect that Luffy defeats BM,
This is what you replied to nik87 when he said Luffy cannot defeat BM. If your claim was that Luffy can damage her but not defeat her then you should have made it clearer.You have no proof that he can't defeat Big Mom.
So past, present and future is the same? So if Fujitora said Luffy has the strength to back it up in Alabasta that means its true? Fujitora was clearly speaking about his future strength. He will have no idea that Luffy will get to Yonko strength in 20+ days.Whether he meant now, or potentially, the result is the same.
You're actually trying to argue that the Manga saying something shouldn't' be believed? How ridiculous, then what should be believed if not what the Manga states especially when it's the assessment of an Admiral?
Maybe you should learn that what characters say isn't always straight from the mouth of Oda.If we go by what the characters say, then does that mean Pica was strong enough to crush both navy and pirates on his own? A group that consists of Luffy, Zoro, Law, Fujitora, and Sabo. It doesn't make sense. I would have said the same thing back then but I would never have had manga facts to back it up.![]()
Just like what Pica said was useless, other panels can be useless as well. However, I am not calling Fuji's panel useless. You misunderstood that panel.Sure you weren't. He was just talking nonsense and the panel was useless. There absolutely was no meaning in bringing up that panel in regard to his strength, and the fact that we know Luffy can get stronger simply if plot requires it.
And this. You gave many reasons as to why SHs need to be the victor here. I don't disagree. And like i said, every MC gains something out of every arc. The basic premise is the same. All you did was delve deep into it. Let me give you another example, SHs need to be the victor in Wano because of Kaido's and Orochi's tyranny. This is all you do, and we know this because we also follow the plot.Mind you, huge difference in saying win from a narrative stand-point and become Pirate King. What you don't seem to understand is
Seems you don't quite grasp the nuance. I'll make it abundantly clear here if you didn't get it previously. Luffy becoming Pirate King is not why he won, if Oda wanted Luffy to become Pirate King 10-20 years later, he can lose all the fights he wants until it's time. What you failed to grasp was that currently, given the story arc and the context and need for plot progression, he had to win or come out the victor for the reasons I pointed out.
- We were talking about an on-going arc where we were stating the outcome that must happen for the intended result.
- Not simply what will happen eventually.
He won, that's simply a fact. And the reasons I stated he'd win was why he won because those reasons became relevant.
Let's go to the things I said when the WCI was playing out.
More or less Big Mom will be defeated because it's necessary in relation to the Reverie, Morgan's presence and I said if he didn't defeat her physically, he'll leave WCI in a way that makes him seen as a threat, thus why he ended up with a 1.5b bounty and 5th Emperor claims.
Talking about plot-progression, not simply Luffy wins because, or Big Mom wins because YONKO as is the famous mantra and circular logic.
Again, speaking from a narrative perspective.![]()
Talking about why it was necessary for a victory using foresight relating to plot progression once again bud.
If you need to rely on chicanery just to make your argument seem credible, evidence is here.![]()
Nope, what I said was if Luffy cannot be expected to defeat Big Mom, he shouldn't be expected to defeat Kaido.Maybe you don't remember, but you said if Luffy cannot defeat BM then beating Kaido isn't possible. I already gave you the reason. Read my post.
You're terribly dishonest, lol.I am not being dishonest to anyone or myself as you have claimed. Editor said 50 chapters or less, and I believe it because he got the information from Oda. However, it is true that it extended to 80 because the initial estimation was off. As you write a story, various new ideas pop up, resulting in extra chapters but the overall concept stays the same.
No, you weren't right.however he didn't and we knew that. but you didn't. that's why you are in denial. i have no reason to be in denial because i was right.
Just requires being able to read what's said properly'; only thing you've done is misread ironically.This is what you replied to nik87 when he said Luffy cannot defeat BM. If your claim was that Luffy can damage her but not defeat her then you should have made it clearer.
Maybe you should learn that what characters say isn't always straight from the mouth of Oda.
Maybe you need to learn to read between the lines because Pica's point was more to do with the fact his ability could engulf and crush everyone in it because he more or less could manipulate huge plots of Dressrosa. It wouldn't have been difficult to crush pirates and soldiers with such a powerful ability.Just like what Pica said was useless, other panels can be useless as well. However, I am not calling Fuji's panel useless. You misunderstood that panel.
If you knew that, you'd have come to the same conclusion in WCI, but you didn't. You didn't have that much insight other than "Big Mom is an Emperor, Emperors are invincible" and such drivel.And this. You gave many reasons as to why SHs need to be the victor here. I don't disagree. And like i said, every MC gains something out of every arc. The basic premise is the same. All you did was delve deep into it. Let me give you another example, SHs need to be the victor in Wano because of Kaido's and Orochi's tyranny. This is all you do, and we know this because we also follow the plot.
Again, you clearly are terribly misinformed or fail to read properly.
You're terribly dishonest, lol.
All you can do is make excuses.
Your insight was poor.
Only one here in denial is you.
Just requires being able to read what's said properly'; only thing you've done is misread ironically.
Maybe you need to learn to read between the lines
Do you really need to offend another user for every quote you reply?Again, requires reading between the lines and using context which your statements seem to severely lack in.