Of course garp had to let that happen to his son. He was aware that his son was a criminal and the punishments which ace's crimes involved. That said, it is not like garp did not have a choice to go balistic on everyone's asses, kick the crap out of anyone he ran into and free ace. he could have done that had he made the decision too. It's not like someone actually forced him to not suckerpunch sengoku and throw the entire platform on which ace was standing to WB was his choice too. IMO there is no way garp could not be considered a free person.
As for glory, I guess it depends on the actual definition you give to it. If you base glory on whether you are liked or not then glory is not particularly achievable for pirates. However if you consider glory as a separate thing from the public opinion there is no reason for any pirate to not have glory.
That said, I don't think glory and freedom should be weighted similarly when comparing pirates and marines. Setting aside that both are achievable for either side, evidently freedom and glory don't have the same weight or at least I would not think they do.
As for glory, I guess it depends on the actual definition you give to it. If you base glory on whether you are liked or not then glory is not particularly achievable for pirates. However if you consider glory as a separate thing from the public opinion there is no reason for any pirate to not have glory.
That said, I don't think glory and freedom should be weighted similarly when comparing pirates and marines. Setting aside that both are achievable for either side, evidently freedom and glory don't have the same weight or at least I would not think they do.


...