- Joined
- May 7, 2017
- Messages
- 67
- Reaction score
- 93
- Age
- 36
- Country
-
The scrutiny around Anakin to me mostly seemed centred around badly written dialogue and bland acting. There was nothing along the lines of him breaking the franchise.I get what you're saying but Anakin was male and that didn't protect him or Hayden Christensen from scrutiny. It happens to characters that are the focal points of disappointing movies.
Criticizing a character is one thing. Putting a negative label on them and accusing them of breaking the franchise is another.
Honestly? Even 1% is a high-ball. A look at the actual numbers of toxic fans and haters will show the numbers being at most in the ballpark of hundreds of thousands. And that's on Twitter and YouTube - which are wretched hives of scum and villainy and whiny man babies. And it's out of tens of millions (or even hundreds of millions?) of Star Wars fans. The number just seems way higher because of how vocal these people are and because they stick to certain visible echo-chambers on the internet.Less than 1% that is bitching about it? Dunno, that seems like a gross mischaracterization to me. I would say the majority of people I know who saw TLJ left feeling mixed or underwhelmed by it. TFA didn't reinvent the wheel, but I still really enjoyed it. I was not against having my expectations subverted. I was even ready for a more "gray" Luke... But sadly the film overall was executed rather poorly IMO.
And, yeah... TLJ has its flaws. I don't deny that. I'm still salty as hell about how poorly written the battles in that movie are.
I see your point and apologize for the second time political twist in my comments.Why wouldn't we consider how Rey was written in the movie? And what does male and female have to do with anything? For someone who hopes the political side of this dies, your sure are hung up on that. I just got done saying how I thought Poe and Finn were bad too for different reasons. And almost nobody had any problem with Rey in the Force Awakens because, as I literally just said, she was written just fine in that movie.
Attachment to her past is not a "flaw" unless it actually results in something bad. Which it didn't.
"Mary Sue" doesn't mean everything works out either. In fact in the actual story that the term comes from the character dies and everybody is at her memorial service talking about how wonderful she was. What it refers to is when characters don't work for their gains and therefor are not empathetic. That was not the case with Luke or even Rey in the The Force Awakens.
And Star Wars is not a power fantasy. There is nothing wrong with power fantasies that's just not what Star Wars is (outside of like videogames). Luke didn't defeat the Emperor. Darth Vader does. That alone would be enough to disqualify it. The movie Commando is power a fantasy. Star Wars at it's core is basically Coming of Age fantasy in Sci-Fi setting. Even the Last Jedi is still trying to be that. It's just failed it, IMO.
The point I was trying to get across was that the scrutiny around her character is just suspiciously intense.
. He is not even a thug... A regular old thug with an iron pipe can easily be scary AF.