Just like Organizized, I've been saving it for a rainy day (in this case, snowy) after @xi0 mentioned it to me a while ago. I hope it's as good as you guys say, especially if both Ustegius and Jammin like it.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
You know, this is what got me about the characters in this show. As the show goes on and the characters grow, I don't think it's as clear as to say character x is a villain, character y is a good guy; I think a few of them walked a fine line in between or crossed over. For certain The Man in Black was a villainous character but I think even his motives are understandable by the end. I dunno, maybe I'm not explaining it properly.I honestly had no idea if he was a good or bad guy until pretty close to the end but he was riveting the whole time.
I get what your saying and that's what i liked about it too. The way everything is set up you almost can't know whether characters are good or not. Or even if they are trying to do something good.You know, this is what got me about the characters in this show. As the show goes on and the characters grow, I don't think it's as clear as to say character x is a villain, character y is a good guy; I think a few of them walked a fine line in between or crossed over. For certain The Man in Black was a villainous character but I think even his motives are understandable by the end. I dunno, maybe I'm not explaining it properly.
I get what your saying and that's what i liked about it too. The way everything is set up you almost can't know whether characters are good or not. Or even if they are trying to do something good.
The prime example was Ed Harris's character. He goes around doing awful things for the entire season but in the end what he wants is for them to be self aware. They seem to be at their closest to that when he's doing something terrible to them; which is a pretty morally complex motivation. But there is the further nuance of whether he wants them to be self aware for their own sake or for the increased satisfaction he may get from torturing them after they can fight back.
We don't really get the answers but what we do get is this very memorable moment where one of them shoots and wounds him and for the first time and he looks so genuinely happy.
What door?I want to erase my memories and rewatch again.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
The prime example was Ed Harris's character. He goes around doing awful things for the entire season but in the end what he wants is for them to be self aware. They seem to be at their closest to that when he's doing something terrible to them; which is a pretty morally complex motivation. But there is the further nuance of whether he wants them to be self aware for their own sake or for the increased satisfaction he may get from torturing them after they can fight back.
We don't really get the answers but what we do get is this very memorable moment where one of them shoots and wounds him and for the first time and he looks so genuinely happy.
Never knew there was thread like this on here. But YOO I'm so happy they're finally doing this. Can't believe it got canceled after season 2. This show is so so good, it has everything people look for in a series nowadays (action, drama, romance) and it gets pretty intense. Can't waitSo excited they'd finally decided to pull their finger out and make this happen ; Young Justice season 3!
I think it's safe to assume that he wants them to be self-aware and with full agency for his own gratification. The MiB found his "true self" in the park. To look at it from an RPG perspective, he's a hardcore completionist. The game of Westworld was always set up for him to win. The Maze was something he sought out as the true "hard-mode". I think him finding Dolores back in Sweetwater when he was young and realizing that it wasn't real is what broke him. I no longer think there is a benevolence to his motives with the hosts. Which actually sort of runs contrary to what Ford was attempting to do in the end.
I don't think that is a safe assumption. That's the cool thing about the character. His desire started as something based around Dolorous then shifted to something dark about himself and what happened with that. But in all the evil stuff there is context and inconsistencies that complicate it.
Like how he wanted Dolorous to shoot him and how disappointed he was when she couldn't. That suggests it's less about what he wants for himself and him wanting this imaginary place to become real.
Even most of the evil stuff he's done can actually be framed as a part of that base desire because of what he said early on about how the Hosts are at the most alive when they experience torment. Does he torment them to feed his own sadism or is it to see them be alive?
One impression that could be taken away by the end is that he's basically a sociopath who is obsessed with making this Westworld and it's hosts real. Which wouldn't be benevolence. It would be a clinical kind of fascination. I mean, in hindsight when you look at everything he does it's actually not sadistic so much as coldly practical.
Hmm, fair enough. But I still sort of see him as not doing what he's doing for the sake of the hosts. At one time, one would think he would do that for Dolores, but not who he is today. At least, he didn't see them like Arnold saw them, or how Ford eventually came to see them, as their creation or children.
But I still sort of fail to see the difference between what he would have wanted and him wanting the park to become "real". Those are still things he desired, for the stakes to be raised. Does he want this so that he can be with Dolores and love her like his wife? Not likely. That doesn't make him evil, no. But does that make him like Arnold or Ford? Probably not. He took control of the park because of this "quest", one that was never intended for him in the first place. He doesn't even seem to be interested in it from a corporate espionage or militaristic standpoint either, like some unknown Delos board members probably could be, considering the capabilities of this technology.
Just be prepared, that they are really doing their own thing with Dirk Gently, it parts quite a bit from the books. But it is an brilliant adaptation, the spirit is there.I'm very interested in Dirk Gently, but have also been very skeptical as the first book is one of my all time favorites. Still, I'm going to watch it, and if my Finnish book nut pal says they capture Adams' style well, it soothes my skepticism at least a little.
Can't get over the last attempt at Dirk Gently as a TV series though. That was mediocre at its peaks.
I have never heard of it, but I'm game for any new show. I'll check it out.It is next on my list.
I just finished Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency season 1. It was brilliant. I loved every second it. I loved random, crazyness, the humor, the pace, the drama, the characters. It has very little to with the actual original books, but it finds the nature of Douglas Adams' style and humor, and uses that while delivering it own thing.
Brilliant. That's all I can say really. And that everything is connected.


Archer is fantastic. The first and second seasons are solid gold.Yeah @Jammin, a friend of mine just finished watching it and told me that if I start, I should pace myself.
After binge-watching a ton of its videos, I've decided to watch Archer finally. It seems just like my sort of show, so I'm sure i'll enjoy it...even though I've ruined a lot of spoiler stuff.