- Joined
- Oct 5, 2015
- Messages
- 472
- Reaction score
- 451
- Age
- 34
- Gender
- Male
- Country
-
I don't think they are necessarily sacrifices. It is just that it will be fine if they are a flop, while they still attract an amount of younger readers.Soooo these sorts of series are basically designed as sacrifices of sorts? Is that why they're placed at the back?
Also, it's still possible it becomes succesful.
I found the page in the forum with the twitter of the mangakas that commented this:
Mag Talk - Weekly Shonen Jump [2019] - Discussion and TOC Talk
Also with this 3 strikes rule, who's on their last chance? I know Iron Knight/Red Sprite guy, Mutou Black/Last Saiyuuki guy, Mitsukubi Condor/Amalgam guy each could have one more try. Naoki Azuma (Shonen Guardian and Sowaka), though Naoki left Shueisha and is now at Kodansha Amon Dai (Muteki...
mangahelpers.com
Shinohara: The reason Shounen Jump could stay on top is because its target audience was always younger than any other shounen magazines. Always maintaining a policy of bringing in new series aimed at kids, even if they are constantly axed. By keeping the door open for the young audience, you can secure brand new readers that are coming in. That said, the reader demographic have gone up in recent years.
Inagaki: Canceling a series may seem negative for adults, but kids don't care. They just go"Those past few weeks a lot of fun! It would've been nice if it continued". New series make it easier for new readers to join, at least for the first couple weeks. By no means is "series that ended short = failure". There are plenty of Jump manga that I love, even if they didn't get an anime.