- Joined
- Jul 18, 2019
- Messages
- 255
- Reaction score
- 865
- Age
- 39
- Gender
- Male
- Country
-
That's probably something that's best tackled on a case by case basis... but if I had to pick one or the other, I personally prefer the current trend of every series getting at least five months in publication. That way, a manga with a slow start has the chance to gain momentum and become good. If a manga hasn't gained momentum by that time, there's much less ambiguity about whether or not it deserves to be axed.Here's a general question I think is worth asking:
Do you guys think Jump should always listen to the general consensus regarding new series and axe the ones which don't have an good reception quickly as soon as possible? Asking because, looking at Yui Kamio, I feel we could've been spared a colossal headache if Jump just axed Shiibashi early.
The obsession with axing a series if it's not amazing in 5-8 chapters has always been a bit weird to me. I think if WSJ adopted that attitude as a policy, the results would be more harmful for the magazine than productive.
. Some are meant to be hits like (the promised Neverland) and some are meant starting as an underdog (kimetsu no yaiba). No worriess