- Joined
- Apr 3, 2014
- Messages
- 3,086
- Reaction score
- 3,972
- Gender
- Male
- Country
-
Yes agreed that its not necessarily a title given by WG and can be from people themselves. In fact I think that's how the Yonko were introduced by Garp e.g. pirates that ruled as if they were emperors. What's not certain is when the vernacular of emperor entered the OP world e.g. maybe 100 years ago they called equivalently powerful and influential pirates "Monarchs." To me this is a distinction without much of a difference since they functionally operate the same way but not everyone here agrees with that point of view.This is what some people don't realise... Emperors are not titles given by the WG.
![]()
It's the world that gives it to them. The world see how powerful and influential they are, and then regard them as Emperors. If a Pirate is strong and influential in a way that makes them comparably superior to the majority, they will call them Emperors.
Blackbeard was called one just after 2 years. The WG doesn't give that title.
There would have been people in the past who would have seen similar Pirates, since their power and influence, and called them Emperors or something similar.
Just because there's not a title for something doesn't mean that thing doesn't exist. A lot of this argument is out of ignorance.
There are others here that are arguing that the exact term "Emperor" is newer and was not used to describe these powerful pirates in the past. They are not arguing that powerful pirates with influence did not exist, just that they were not literally being called "Emperor" even if they were called some other term that functionally meets the same definition.
