More reliable than those goofballs at CNN and their clickbaity faulty reporting. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1x5Ew-l5wsbecause Fox News is a reliable source.
I wonder if it's because of the racist tone that Trump gives out.
Well, sharkbait used the word "clickbaity" which I think suggests two things:That's a video they made themselves, what exactly is it exposing?
Not that I'm a big fan of CNN myself, I definitely think they're a bit too sensationalist.
That CNN are fool of goofballs on camera and they shouldnt be trusted. They also made tons of mistakes this year reporting active shooters when there werent any, mistaking flags as ISIS symbols and in that video many other mistakes. I avoid CNN for their blatant non partisian coverage.
I mean, whether any of that is true or not, the same exact thing can be said about Fox News, you just seem more inclined to enjoy their kind of bias...
Ironic, once again, as Fox News is way worse, yet you trust them. I also remember them saying Net Neutrality was shot down when in reality, it was approved. For that reason, you should avoid Fox News too because they're extremely biased. However, it seems like you're okay with biased sources that tend to report incorrectly as long as they adhere to or agree with your views, which is a common theme amongst the republicans that I know.
Yes, the core of the problem there is that certain people are manipulating a certain false premise which is being taken to its logical extreme in modern day reactionary ideology. Starting from that false premise, you get:
Agreed, I absolutely hate how they can spend multiple days on a 24/7 network talking about the same 2 or 3 topics the entire time. But they've chosen to go for temporary ratings spikes all the time instead of steadily building a solid reputation for journalistic integrity that will attract a loyal following. The sad thing is all signs point to the possibility there likely IS a market for good (especially investigative) journalism, but they can't bear to weather the low ratings numbers they will have to sustain temporarily in order to get there, as word of mouth spreads. It also would cost more though, which is certainly a major hurdle, but CNN is one of the organizations best positioned to be able to afford that expense, if they ever wanted to get serious.
Name other candidates who don't do this
Jeb bush, a republican candidate, flies commercial http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/jeb-bush-flies-commercial_55f62422e4b063ecbfa4b2f1
You read the article, right? It's supposedly due to a dip in campaign donations. The opposite is probably happening with Sander's campaign, hence the change. I don't understand why you think this is an issue.
Because in our state of virginia we are extremely concerned with candidates use of money on private things and more. Surely anyone remembers the candidates use of commercial airliners or private and facing scrutiny for wasting money. Worst yet jail time for improper use of money.
Well fair enough, but why fixate on one candidate? And how is a private jet considered misuse of donations when they use it to campaign and the office they're running for has an entire 747 to himself paid for with tax money?
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
I think it is. When ones campaign is focused on addressing the wealth disparities, using a private jet, something that non wealthy Americans cant fly on, it raises ones eyebrows at the hypocritical double standard Sanders is claiming he stands for. There are alternatives like driving to town hall meetings grass roots style, train or bus for his staffers is available.
don't see what's hard to understand. For republicans, it's okay if other fellow republicans or conservatives steal stuff, lie, attack other republicans, or whatever, but if a democrat or liberal does it, SHAME ON THEM! Republicans are full of double standards, which I thought was obvious.