Are guns not a device which is specifically designed for killing? Or the main purpose of a gun is recreational?
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Yeah, polls are very Inaccurate till now. But many articles in the net on how Trump is destroying GOP.
Not to my knowledge. The controversy arose when they catered or sponsored some "family" conferences in some places. Groups that were for the "protection" of marriage, etc. Discriminating against homosexuals only insofar that the people in charge there clearly aren't for marriage equality. But none of that has anything to do with the day-to-day business, so I think you're misremembering.
Guns are devices meant for killing, but Shark likes to bullshit and say guns are recreational when there has been enough gun deaths and massacres in the country... unless Shark and other gun lovers think shooting/mass shooting humans is part of recreational activity.
Oh. I don't understand the backlash, other than them supporting violent anti-homosexual groups.
It's like any controversy, the people who disagree with it blow it way out of proportion. The people in the corporate structure are taking that stance, but it's inconsequential as far as day-to-day business goes...I mean, unless someone wants to have their wedding reception or wedding catered by a fast food place?
Both, as well as self-defense. Gun culture is deeply embedded in US culture. I think one of the more interesting developments over the last several decades is the rationale for gun control laws. Originally gun control laws were designed to keep non-desirables (e.g. blacks) from owning firearms. Nowadays the ideological descendants of gun control advocates are the ones fighting tooth-and-nail to expand gun rights despite overwhelming evidence that stricter laws are needed to keep firearms out of the real threats, like domestic abusers. Unsurprisingly, it turns out the Orlando shooter was a domestic abuser himself.
Or planted by the clintons
Agreed.... the brilliance in it is the disturbing amount of sense it makes even after you think about it. A normal conspiracy theory would normally crumble upon itself with a minimal degree of scrutiny...Or planted by the clintons
I just love that theory. It is the only conspiracy theory i have ever loved.
But yes, as it seems now, trump has no shot at winning.
While Clinton didnt even really get started, Trump already destroyed a lot of the ppossible sympathy undecided voters might have had with him.
'Several wounded'...
Last I read, Trump was ahead of Clinton... I'm not completely sure if she has the win in the bag given her image and Trump's image.
Not sure about that. Many "undecided" voters decided to vote for Trump because of the protesters' behavior, like attacking Trump supporters and blocking traffic or something. BUt then again, they were probably going to vote for Trump anyway because I don't recall any of my friends pointing out Trump supporters attacking minorities or seeming to understand that the violence from Trump and his supporters are likely why protesters are responding with violence.Or planted by the clintons
I just love that theory. It is the only conspiracy theory i have ever loved.
But yes, as it seems now, trump has no shot at winning.
While Clinton didnt even really get started, Trump already destroyed a lot of the ppossible sympathy undecided voters might have had with him.
More like, xenophobic people, not racist rednecks. THere was a video of a black Trump supporter attacking a white protester, while I know few brownies who support Trump and think he's the best choice who will make America great again. I don't understand why Trump being a businessman and not a politician is a good reason; that's like saying a fast food worker with no education would be a good rocket scientist. Not only that, but Trump is a bad businessman who has gone bankrupt several times.
At the very least, illegal immigrants who are in danger in their home country should either be legalized or be sent to a safer country. Other than that, my views towards illegal immigration leans towards conservative, as horrible as conservatives are.
I don't see why you brought this up.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
He was ahead in 2 or 3 polls of which one was a fox poll.
I did read, its just further proof that in an area with less of a gun industry events will still happen, hence the need for no changes to current gun legislature. Let us continue to have free access to our recreational devices please.
So no answer to my post as usual?
Whats the point of seat belts when alcohol is legal and people will drive under the influence or be distracted by passengers and cell phones. Until those are banned, then there is no need for more gun control.
the point is that we know that their usage reduced fatalities in car crashes very reliably and very significantly, while lax gun laws make mass shootings more likely.