American Politics

GrySun

Registered User
有名人 / Yuumeijin / Celebrity
Joined
Dec 22, 2014
Messages
3,360
Reaction score
33,587
Gender
Male
Country
Earth Kindom

Best video I've ever seen. I've watched Home Alone 2 like 3 times and I never noticed that subtle little Trump. And that WWE scene :kreygasm
And at the end, "Our next president?" Such foresight, amazing.

?

There were a lot of polls conducted so far.
And you are right that there is still time, but what do u think will happen?
The only change which will still happen is that Sanders will likely endorse clinton which will give her some additional votes from people who didnt like the idea of voting for her.
That bonus wont happen anymore for trump.

Trump had a field day so far because a lot of the rep voters were easily impressed by his attitude, while the rest of america was apalled or just laughed about it.
And, as i said, his opponents had a simliar audience (the whole primary could have been another story if it was only trump vs cruz all along).
This both is gone in the generals, i don't see any chance of him winning.
Polls about the general election are quite unreliable at this point. I've seen quite many polls myself, some place Clinton 6 percent over Trump, some by 11, and similar values. There is a reason why people don't just use a poll to decide the next president but a longer election system you know?
Besides that many of those polls are very fishy. Do you know how many polls I've seen that place Sanders a lot higher than Clinton? Yet she's going to win by quite a lot.
I can see Trump rising over Clinton in the next few months, anything can happen. Lots of undecided voters, lots of Trump/Clinton haters, and which party unifies more. Either way we will see the developments.

Uh, I think you have me confused with Milly or something...

Saying someone is being reckless with their words or calling them a demagogue isn't the same as not holding people responsible for their own actions.
Perhaps I did, I remember someone excusing the moronic colorado protesters back when it happened with "It's all Trumps fault for inciting them".. must've been him.

Look at that shit-eating grin. He's such a magnificent troll, it's unbelievable.
 

kkck

Waifu Slayer
神のごとし / Kami no Gotoshi / Godlike
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
46,270
Reaction score
24,911
Gender
Hidden
Country
Fire Nation


I love Hispanics, I have a ton of Hispanic friends!
--- Double Post Merged, ---
Shame on anyone who says he doesn't love hispanics, he's eating a taco salad for fucks sake!
Taco salads are awesome! If only I could buy one outside the US...
 

shionoro

Mangahelper
有名人 / Yuumeijin / Celebrity
Mangahelper
Joined
Jul 7, 2011
Messages
3,750
Reaction score
1,477
Gender
Male
Country
Germany
Polls about the general election are quite unreliable at this point. I've seen quite many polls myself, some place Clinton 6 percent over Trump, some by 11, and similar values. There is a reason why people don't just use a poll to decide the next president but a longer election system you know?
Besides that many of those polls are very fishy. Do you know how many polls I've seen that place Sanders a lot higher than Clinton? Yet she's going to win by quite a lot.
I can see Trump rising over Clinton in the next few months, anything can happen. Lots of undecided voters, lots of Trump/Clinton haters, and which party unifies more. Either way we will see the developments.
But there is also a reason why polls are pretty accurate most of the time.
There is a longer election cycle, but resulting from that, there are also polls every few weeks which all add up to a rather accurate picture.

We saw that with obama vs mc cain: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/general_election_mccain_vs_obama-225.html
We saw it with Obama vs Romney. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...ma_vs_romney_compared_to_obama_vs_mccain.html
We saw it with bush vs kerry http://www.realclearpolitics.com/bush_vs_kerry.html

Polls from proven trusthwortyh institutes can usually be taken as a good enough measure to who is in the lead.


You are right when you say that this can change, but i wouldnt know why. Sanders will endorse clinton, while a lot of republicans openly speak out against trump.
Trump will not get a lot votes from black or latino people. He will get the votes of the people who already voted for him in the primary.
The democrats stand, all the bernie bro drama aside, much more united than the reps do.

I don't see how trump would ever catch up
 

xi0

あの術
最終形態 / Saishuu Keitai / Final Form
Administrator
Joined
Feb 3, 2006
Messages
65,177
Reaction score
30,219
Gender
Male
Country
Pyke
Perhaps I did, I remember someone excusing the moronic colorado protesters back when it happened with "It's all Trumps fault for inciting them".. must've been him.
I didn't say he deserved no blame either. There are examples like in North Carolina where they were exploring charging him for trying to incite a riot. He consistently skirts the line, and sometimes even goes over it. But that doesn't mean the people who act in response to such things are blameless.

Look at that shit-eating grin. He's such a magnificent troll, it's unbelievable.
Haha, yeah! Can't wait to see him in the Oval Office!....for da lulz ofc! kek XD
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Taco salads are awesome! If only I could buy one outside the US...

...that's awkward
 

gnut

Registered User
伝説メンバー / Densetsu / Legendary Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Messages
11,490
Reaction score
18,519
Age
52
Gender
Male
Country
United States
you see what that moron bobby knight said about trump...
he'd be a great president because he's not afraid of nuking someone:epicfacepalm
 

kkck

Waifu Slayer
神のごとし / Kami no Gotoshi / Godlike
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
46,270
Reaction score
24,911
Gender
Hidden
Country
Fire Nation
I didn't say he deserved no blame either. There are examples like in North Carolina where they were exploring charging him for trying to incite a riot. He consistently skirts the line, and sometimes even goes over it. But that doesn't mean the people who act in response to such things are blameless.


Haha, yeah! Can't wait to see him in the Oval Office!....for da lulz ofc! kek XD
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---


...that's awkward
Well, with that I am convinced is simply taunting... something. I don't know who or what but that picture can't be anything other than trolling. The guy is just fishing for attention.....
 

Dragoon

Registered User
英雄メンバー / Eiyuu Menbaa / Hero Member
Joined
Feb 29, 2016
Messages
603
Reaction score
476
Country
Band of the Hawks 2
Trump was probably fapping to it before they decided to shoot that pic of him
 

M3J

MH Senpai
神のごとし / Kami no Gotoshi / Godlike
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
48,828
Reaction score
17,292
Gender
Male
Country
Akatsuki
What is the point of abortions? There is only one end goal of abortion and that is to kill a innocent babe.
No, the goal of abortion is to save a mother's life or stop the unwanted baby from being born. You may be cruel, but the women who get abortions aren't. They'd rather not raise the baby they don't want or give it away where they'd likely have a bad life. You'd be surprised at what you can learn if you step in to the real world and actually talk to people who aren't liars.

Why would kids need welfare when families in good situations should be the only ones having children. People with well paying smart jobs, strong financial stability and job security are the only ones who can handle child raising. Everyone else ought to reconsider the need to have a child and instead focus on bettering their own lives to get out of their dire situations.

I dont see how refugee children is similar to abortion. Refugee children can make it in their home country, its not us Americans who need to protect and harbor these people of questionable security. Not allowing them into the country is not a death wish or forcing them to be killed. Children always survive in war torn country, I mean, you never see countries blasted off the map with none of their people remaining.
Nothing guarantees families remaining in good situations, and it's not up to that to decide. But again, you prove your hypocrisy. You're not against abortion for moral and ethical reasons, you don't even give a crap about lives. You prove that over and over, and it's clear that your stance against abortion is a lie, whether you know it or not. If you truly cared about babies and human lives, you would be supporting kids getting welfare, not saying only people with good jobs should have kids. And you need to stop saying 'smart" jobs, as if it's superior to jobs like janitorial work or waiting.

Do you not know what refugee means? Go look up the definition of refugee. Jesus fucking CHrist, people like you are why people from other countries look down on America. "Refugees have no reason to leave their country! They can make it in their home country!" NO THEY FUCKING CAN'T, WHICH IS WHY THEY'RE REFUGEES!! The literal definition of refugee contradicts what you say and think about them!! If refugees could make it in their home countries, they wouldn't be leaving it in the first place. How ignorant and dumb can you get, really?

Not allowing them into the country is a death wish or forcing them to be killed when they go back to the country where they're in danger. This is common sense, and it's appalling you and other people lack this much common sense. Try reading actual news, not the shitty conservative news that are probably still saying Obama was born in Kenya. Good sources of news will tell you that countless of kids are killed, especially at the hands of American weapons (though I'm not sure how accurate this is or if it's an exaggeration). But you're a horrible person, you don't care about children dying, whether from war ravaged countries, countries with scarce food, or poverty, so therefore you have no right to do anything or talk about anti abortion on the grounds of moral and ethical reasons. It's clear you're neither moral nor ethical, at best you're selective about it.

And if you don't understand, refugee children and abortion aren't really the same, but they both at some point deal with death. And you still have provided no proof that refugee children are dangerous or more of security liabilities than babies who aren't wanted, who'd be mistreated and neglected, and thus grow up to be burden and liability, if they survive.


A right to kill babies is not something we should give to the hands of people to decide but to the government. Government is tasked with protecting life and liberty and freedom.

I dont see the need to attack NRA when its good to have trade organizations to lobby for the rights of a much needed industry that provides tons of jobs and economic benefits. I cant think of a single thing Planned Parenthood does to advance any industry or to help the economy out. Everything it does the Department of Health and Human Services, local state funded clinics and hospitals can do better.
If that is true, then the government should decide who gets guns and who doesn't. A right to give people a tool to end lives is not something we should give to the hands of people, given the amount of shootings that have happened. Government is tasked with protecting life, liberty, and freedom, so the government should decide who gets guns and who doesn't, which hopefully most people don't.

But yes, abortion is a right we should give to the hands of people because it is them who are being affected, not you or the government. You don't even know how many abortions occur in this country because no one tells you they got an abortion, nor are you compelled to see or hear women getting abortions. Proper way to protect liberty and freedom is to give women the right to decide what to do with their bodies and their babies. Even if you ban abortion, all that'll do is make women find ways to get one, whether doing it on their own or finding a secret place where conditions wouldn't be as safe.

NRA is a horrible organization that supports murder by making more people have more guns. If it was up to them, even the most horrible murderers would have small machine guns. The gun industry is not needed, and I highly doubt it provides tons of jobs.

Again, the reason why you can't think of the benefits that Planned Parenthood offers is because you don't read my post, and you don't read good sources, you only read and listen to dumb, biased sources that will lie to you despite proof. Planned Parenthood isn't about helping economy out (which it does, in a way), it's about helping people out. It can do it better than Department of Health and Human Services, local state funded clinics, and hospitals. That's basically a fact, from what people who have used Planned Parenthood have said. I'm willin to bet if you went there once or twice, you'd start to think better of PLanned Parenthood and realize that your God (who is evil and selfish, according to the Bible) would support Planned Parenthood and most of what it does.

Why would I offer support the woman and the kid. In their situation she would have a well paying job and strong financial support as well as child support from the husband to be able to raise the kid so there is nothing disastrous about the situation you propose. Once the child is born I dont think the responsibility is on the government anymore.
In a traditional family, women don't have jobs, they stay at home and care for it while the significant others earn money. And if you wouldn't offer support to the woman and her child, then you have no right whatsoever to talk about abortion. If you truly did care about life, you wouldn't mind the government offering assistance or you yourself assisting the mother and child. And in order for the husband or boyfriend to offer child support, he actually has to. There are so many occasions where the husband left the mother or expecting mother and did not help them at all, and many occasions where the father was a deadbeat who did almost nothing and would even abuse his wife and kid/s. Traditional family value doesn't exist, and America never had it.



When the teaching is you reap what you sow and that investments for the future are good, then it seems doubtful that increasing minimum wage would be supported by the teachings from the word of God. I also doubt the word of God would support an organization who is tasked with killing babies. You cant just pick and choose what a criminal organization does and sweep its abortions under the rug when its out in broad daylight about what they are doing. Additionally you cant just increase minimum wage for lazy jobs that people mess up in. I went to Mickey D's again recently and the people working seemed incapable of reading the receipt and giving me a large cup for my soda saying I wasnt charged for it, when the receipt clearly said ML-LRG. Does someone in such a position really deserve to make more than 8 dollars an hour for such an embarrassingly and aggravating mix up? I think not.
I'm pretty sure God would support people and families being able to live and make ends meet, so he would support minimum wage increase. But then again, God is a horrible, selfish person, so maybe not. If God was a good person, he'd support an organization who is tasked with educating people about sex, sexual health, and how to be safe, and he'd support an organization knowing that unwanted babies would likely live a miserable life, and he'd want to avoid that happening. THere's nothing criminal about what Planned Parenthood does, given abortions are legal and only 3% of the services that Planned Parenthood provide.

What if they were busy? What if you were rude to them? If a group should be judged on mistakes of one person, then I guess homosexuals should be put in jail for pedophilia, or no republican should ever be politicians for lying and deceiving the public, or everyone in the financial sector should be tried as criminals given many have cheated people.

And given they have to deal with bad customers such as you, yes they do deserve an increase in minimum wage. Many times I have seen customers be assholes to employees, so I can't blame the employees. Also, you're overreacting over a simple mistake that anyone could make, even your precious high brain powered coworkers.

When was the last time someone was turned down by a doctor for their orientation? Its not like there is only one doctor in a city or something.


Yet these people love playing first person shooter video games, violent shooting video games, and watching movies with shooting happening. I doubt these people seriously look down on America as well as doubt people in America are as hypersensitive to guns as you are.
http://www.washingtonian.com/2015/0...-still-struggling-with-access-to-health-care/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-parents-and-theres-nothing-illegal-about-it/ http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2015/...-doctor-discrimination-child-same-sex-couple/ (same story)
http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/05/health/nebraska-health-lgbt/
http://nwlc.org/resources/health-ca...t-lgbt-people-and-individuals-living-hivaids/
It happens all the time. Conservative news would probably ignore that, if not praise doctors for turning them down. And there's no excuse for doctors to turn down anyone, and you of all people should not be defending this. But from what I've learned about you, you seem not to care if you're not affected.


Movies and video games are different from real life, shockingly. Not sure why you bring that up. And yes, these people do look down on America and make fun of us for it, as well as our obsession with guns given the mass shootings that's been going on. Not only do I have foreign friends, but I also read foreign opinions and some news, and they keep wondering why we keep being more gun crazed the more shootings there are.

And I'm not hypersensitive to guns. I'm just not a fan of people being killed. A conservative once tried to prove me wrong and linked me to a story where two guys in China used cleavers to attack people. That backfired because no one was dead, or at least majority of the people survived, which is difficult to say when someone gets hit by a bullet.
 

xi0

あの術
最終形態 / Saishuu Keitai / Final Form
Administrator
Joined
Feb 3, 2006
Messages
65,177
Reaction score
30,219
Gender
Male
Country
Pyke


I think this very godly woman puts it more eloquently than anyone else could.

And either way, the law says abortion is a matter of privacy before it could ever be a matter of morality...aka it's none of your fucking business.
 

SharkBait

MH Senpai
伝説メンバー / Densetsu / Legendary Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
14,071
Reaction score
6,930
Gender
Male
Country
United States
But you're a horrible person, you don't care about children dying, whether from war ravaged countries, countries with scarce food, or poverty, so therefore you have no right to do anything or talk about anti abortion on the grounds of moral and ethical reasons. It's clear you're neither moral nor ethical, at best you're selective about it.
How does wishing for babies to not be kileld make me a horrible person. Or that I dont want refugees who will endanger us into the country. No where in the requirements to be an American does it say we need to be pro refugee and take people into our country. The better way is how we currently handle things, to send our traditionally strong military to these countries to offer humanitarian aid and to crush these evil empires. There is no need to take in refugees when the world could be a safer place.

I didnt know people were being denied healthcare for orientation. It seems odd to have that view when the healthcare industry would have people who benefit from taking more customers, so why deny someone healthcare?
And given they have to deal with bad customers such as you, yes they do deserve an increase in minimum wage. Many times I have seen customers be assholes to employees, so I can't blame the employees. Also, you're overreacting over a simple mistake that anyone could make, even your precious high brain powered coworkers.
People in high brain powered positions deal with more complex work so its understandable that mistakes could happen. The more complex something is the more there is a chance for a mistake, meanwhile for something like a low brain power position in which youre just reading a receipt or reading an order from your notepad or a computer monitor, mistakes should be not existant. I dont understand your dislike of high brain powered positions or financial sector jobs as the people there worked hard and suceeded in life to get jobs that are actually meaningful to many people. I dont see how anything a person who waits a table in a mom and pop shop or a person reading a receipt at Mickey D's is meaningful or important. When was the last time someone from some position at Mickey D's ran for president, now we have an example of a person who successfully made it in life in a very meaningful position is a candidate for a major party in the US (Trump) proving people in the financial investment sector are not as evil as you paint them.
 

shionoro

Mangahelper
有名人 / Yuumeijin / Celebrity
Mangahelper
Joined
Jul 7, 2011
Messages
3,750
Reaction score
1,477
Gender
Male
Country
Germany
How does wishing for babies to not be kileld make me a horrible person. Or that I dont want refugees who will endanger us into the country. No where in the requirements to be an American does it say we need to be pro refugee and take people into our country. The better way is how we currently handle things, to send our traditionally strong military to these countries to offer humanitarian aid and to crush these evil empires. There is no need to take in refugees when the world could be a safer place.
But that is not happening.
The funding for refugee camps and humanitarian aid was cut down in the last decade time and time again.
It's easy to say not 'oh well it would have been better if there wasnt a crisis', but there is one, and thus the US shoudl take refugees.
They do not endanger your country (guns do, tbh). They cost some money, but so does humanitarian aid.
Furthermore, your military is not able to prevent refugee problems. It is simply not a matter of military power.
 

kkck

Waifu Slayer
神のごとし / Kami no Gotoshi / Godlike
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
46,270
Reaction score
24,911
Gender
Hidden
Country
Fire Nation
^To add to that, there are actual reasonable reasons to not send ground troops to fight ISIS. Defeating ISIS is not as easy as merely killing all of them (which is likely just not possible). Isis needs to be defeated without whoever is fighting them becoming propaganda fodder ISIS can use for recruitment. Obama has made the point that the reason they are not sending troops to fight ISIS is because doing so would play into ISIS rhetoric and make things worst. And it is quite clear considering the Iraq and Libya fiascoes that just going somewhere, removing whatever government is in place, and leaving just makes everything worst in the long term. Just going in and killing ISIS wouldn't work, they would just be replaced by something else. At least on paper what obama is doing is surprisingly sensible all things considered (specially the not very distant Libya...).
 

SharkBait

MH Senpai
伝説メンバー / Densetsu / Legendary Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
14,071
Reaction score
6,930
Gender
Male
Country
United States
If only democrats would tune in to hear this. They would reconsider who they are voting for especially Hillary Rodham Obama fans.
 

kkck

Waifu Slayer
神のごとし / Kami no Gotoshi / Godlike
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
46,270
Reaction score
24,911
Gender
Hidden
Country
Fire Nation
Bill O'Reilly is a pundit... and obama hasn't really done anything to address wealth distribution, at least nothing significant.
 

shionoro

Mangahelper
有名人 / Yuumeijin / Celebrity
Mangahelper
Joined
Jul 7, 2011
Messages
3,750
Reaction score
1,477
Gender
Male
Country
Germany
^To add to that, there are actual reasonable reasons to not send ground troops to fight ISIS. Defeating ISIS is not as easy as merely killing all of them (which is likely just not possible). Isis needs to be defeated without whoever is fighting them becoming propaganda fodder ISIS can use for recruitment. Obama has made the point that the reason they are not sending troops to fight ISIS is because doing so would play into ISIS rhetoric and make things worst. And it is quite clear considering the Iraq and Libya fiascoes that just going somewhere, removing whatever government is in place, and leaving just makes everything worst in the long term. Just going in and killing ISIS wouldn't work, they would just be replaced by something else. At least on paper what obama is doing is surprisingly sensible all things considered (specially the not very distant Libya...).
Well Lybia was not really Obama's fault. it is true obama could have done more to stabilize the region after removing Gaddafi, but....It's not like Obama wanted this war, that's on the french and british.
They could have showed more effort, too, and didnt.
With Iraq, it's really another thing altogether.
The Iraq war was definitely a mistake, but noone can complain about the build up the US did.
They put a lot of effort into Iraq, and it still went to hell because their troops let the IS get their weapons.
That happened because the IS targeted Sunni areas and those guys really don't feel like giving their live for an (in their opinion) opressive shia regime in Bagdad.
This ethnical component is nothing the US could ever change, and they also cannot tell iraqs government how to do politics once it is installed (unless they want to face complains about colonialization).

The truth is that the west is awfully tired of adventures in the middle east or africa and is pretty busy with himself, even tho now effort in those regions (whether military or socially) is more urgent than ever.
 

kkck

Waifu Slayer
神のごとし / Kami no Gotoshi / Godlike
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
46,270
Reaction score
24,911
Gender
Hidden
Country
Fire Nation
Well Lybia was not really Obama's fault. it is true obama could have done more to stabilize the region after removing Gaddafi, but....It's not like Obama wanted this war, that's on the french and british.
They could have showed more effort, too, and didnt.
With Iraq, it's really another thing altogether.
The Iraq war was definitely a mistake, but noone can complain about the build up the US did.
They put a lot of effort into Iraq, and it still went to hell because their troops let the IS get their weapons.
That happened because the IS targeted Sunni areas and those guys really don't feel like giving their live for an (in their opinion) opressive shia regime in Bagdad.
This ethnical component is nothing the US could ever change, and they also cannot tell iraqs government how to do politics once it is installed (unless they want to face complains about colonialization).

The truth is that the west is awfully tired of adventures in the middle east or africa and is pretty busy with himself, even tho now effort in those regions (whether military or socially) is more urgent than ever.
Well, it is true it wasn't an obama initiative but the whole thing was at best half assed from there.... The US whether it wants it or not is a major player in this sort of thing and the US backing up the whole thing plays a huge role. Obama is someone whom on principle should not have backed such a ridiculous thing. And if he had to back it up there should have clearly been better planning for the future of the whole thing. I will agree on this not being nearly as bad as iraq was. But obama did go as far as skipping congress for this.... and what is there to show for this? Realistically speaking most of the intervention on the middle east has lead to more instability as a whole.... At this moment the only thing I would agree on when it comes to the middle east is fighting ISIS and even that is only because their actual objective is some form of end of the world deal....
 

shionoro

Mangahelper
有名人 / Yuumeijin / Celebrity
Mangahelper
Joined
Jul 7, 2011
Messages
3,750
Reaction score
1,477
Gender
Male
Country
Germany
Well, it is true it wasn't an obama initiative but the whole thing was at best half assed from there.... The US whether it wants it or not is a major player in this sort of thing and the US backing up the whole thing plays a huge role. Obama is someone whom on principle should not have backed such a ridiculous thing. And if he had to back it up there should have clearly been better planning for the future of the whole thing. I will agree on this not being nearly as bad as iraq was. But obama did go as far as skipping congress for this.... and what is there to show for this? Realistically speaking most of the intervention on the middle east has lead to more instability as a whole.... At this moment the only thing I would agree on when it comes to the middle east is fighting ISIS and even that is only because their actual objective is some form of end of the world deal....
I am not opposed to the lybia intervention. I think it was necessary because we would have had a syria situation elseways.
The Us was a major player, sure, but france showed that it is more than capable of doing things like that on its own in mali.
But it didnt. Obama was sure the europeans would show more engagement, and he admitted that mistake.
The US people were tired of war at t his point and Obama knew that very well. he was partially elected due to that.
Opening another space where US groundtroops die before even cpomlpetely withdrawing from iraq and afghanistan was a no go for his term.
He was out of options, but the europeans weren't, and they wanted it.
I really cannot blame obama for doing what he did.

But the whole west is guilty for not caring about conflicts as long as they don't bother us.
Gaddafi was accepted as long as he stopped the refugees from coming over the see while holding lybia stabile.
There was also no engagement at all in the syrian crisis (not even big humanitarian engagement) until europe noticed a'sudden' refugee influx.
 

M3J

MH Senpai
神のごとし / Kami no Gotoshi / Godlike
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
48,828
Reaction score
17,292
Gender
Male
Country
Akatsuki
How does wishing for babies to not be kileld make me a horrible person. Or that I dont want refugees who will endanger us into the country. No where in the requirements to be an American does it say we need to be pro refugee and take people into our country. The better way is how we currently handle things, to send our traditionally strong military to these countries to offer humanitarian aid and to crush these evil empires. There is no need to take in refugees when the world could be a safer place.
Because you don't care about anyone else's lives, which shows you're not pro-life at all. Do you have proof these refugees will endanger us? Be more dangerous than babies who are not wanted? Because as far as I recall, I've read more cases of neglected kids growing up to be bad people while refugee kids have contributed more to the US.

But it's common sense that in order for one to be pro-life, one must care about all lives, not selectively care about a group of life and then stop giving a shit after it's born. You're either pro-life or you're not, and you clearly are not pro-life. For someone who wants liberty and freedom, you sure are against it.

Our "traditionally strong military" is part of the reason why refugees exist. US's policy of interfering in other countries does far more harm than good, it's not the refugees' fault for wanting to come into our country. If we never took in refugees, we'd not be as advanced as we are now as these refugees would be dead before they could either make a difference or before their kids could make a difference.

I didnt know people were being denied healthcare for orientation. It seems odd to have that view when the healthcare industry would have people who benefit from taking more customers, so why deny someone healthcare?
Because same reason you want to deny refugees entry into the US - xenophobia. More specifically, homophobia. But you likely don't care because it doesn't affect you, I bet. You didn't know this was a real thing, which further proves my point. I highly doubt conservative sources would even tell you these things, and if they did, they'd probably defend the doctors who refused.

Further proof that America isn't as free as you make it out to be, and that liberty doesn't really exist as doctors can deny you health care just for being homosexual or county clerks can refuse to marry same sex couples, all just because of religious reasons that many themselves don't follow (Kim Davies apparently got divorced multiple times, which according to others is a no-no in the Bible).




People in high brain powered positions deal with more complex work so its understandable that mistakes could happen. The more complex something is the more there is a chance for a mistake, meanwhile for something like a low brain power position in which youre just reading a receipt or reading an order from your notepad or a computer monitor, mistakes should be not existant. I dont understand your dislike of high brain powered positions or financial sector jobs as the people there worked hard and suceeded in life to get jobs that are actually meaningful to many people. I dont see how anything a person who waits a table in a mom and pop shop or a person reading a receipt at Mickey D's is meaningful or important. When was the last time someone from some position at Mickey D's ran for president, now we have an example of a person who successfully made it in life in a very meaningful position is a candidate for a major party in the US (Trump) proving people in the financial investment sector are not as evil as you paint them.
No, if it's a high brain powered positions, then people should be high brain powered and not make mistakes, otherwise they're clearly not cut out for the jobs and should be fired. Mistakes shouldn't happen at all.

Because people in financial sector have cheated people and hurt our economy and people's faith tremendously. I don't understand why you support criminals so vehemently while talking shit about people whose mistakes doesn't hurt anyone, especially you. A simple mistake by a fast food server doesn't do anything to you but waste five extra minutes, but someone in financial sector deceiving people hurts a lot of people because they're stealing money and hurting their company's image, which can also hurt America's faith. The terms "high/low brain powered positions" are made up by people who want to feel better than others when in reality, anyone who brags about having high positions are bad people.

Without these people at a mom and pop shop or McDonald's, you wouldn't be able to get your food or items. If you don't think they're meaningful or important, then don't go to these places. You clearly think they're important or meaningful to the point that you spend money there.

Actually, Trump proves that people in financial sector are evil, along with Bernie Madoff and Jordan Belfort, two people who deceived countless of others and profited off them. Now these victims have to work because they lost all their live savings, and it scares me that someone like you don't care and still support these horrible people lying and cheating people. It further proves to me that you are a bad person, and people like you and these criminals should be stopped and/or monitored before more damage occurs. Also, Trump making it in life means jackshit, at all. He received $1 million loan from his dad that gave him a headstart and then got over $100 million in inheritance. Even a complete failure of a businessman can do a lot with the amount of money that Trump got, which despite that still declared bankruptcy multiple times. So far, three evil people who prove majority in financial sector are bad people, and sources back up more bad people existing as well.

Trump is the worst example you could use to defend people. Isn't he primarily real estate anyway?

If only democrats would tune in to hear this. They would reconsider who they are voting for especially Hillary Rodham Obama fans.
Pretty sure democrats aren't going to use Fox News as a source, or O'Reilly. Both are shit, and anyone who believes Fox News deserves to get deceived.
 

SharkBait

MH Senpai
伝説メンバー / Densetsu / Legendary Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
14,071
Reaction score
6,930
Gender
Male
Country
United States
Before people assault the US for refugees they should instead turn to countries harboring refugees and push for reform of refugee treatment.
 

shionoro

Mangahelper
有名人 / Yuumeijin / Celebrity
Mangahelper
Joined
Jul 7, 2011
Messages
3,750
Reaction score
1,477
Gender
Male
Country
Germany
Before people assault the US for refugees they should instead turn to countries harboring refugees and push for reform of refugee treatment.
But how does that make sense? The US can do that when they themselves have efficiently integrated regufees under good living conditions.

They can hardly blame anyone if they themselves completely deny any responsibility.
 
Top