Yeah, dunno why or who approved a lifetime appointment for judges, especially when they tend to be so out of touch way later in their old age. But on the other hand, it'd be shitty if we kept getting more conservative judges.
Sounds like a plan. Turnabout's fair play.Sounds great
So how do we feel about Biden packing the court?

It would restore balance to their decisions. Before Trump the court was basically 4-4-1, now it's 6-3 with Roberts occasionally being a swing vote, but not really.At this point I don't even know if packing the court would even help anything. Court packing would be motivated at this point because half of the people in the country believe most justices are partisan hacks who are there to do mostly ideological/religious mumbo jumbo. Court packing will satisfy half the country but in turn leave the other half of the country with the impression that the other side filled the court with their satanic partisan hacks. Court packing is more a war tactic to pressure at this point but it's not actually a fix to the system. It doesn't result in a workable system...
I get the math, my point is more about whether this is a workable system that doesn't result in people just setting the scotus building on fire along with everything else.It would restore balance to their decisions. Before Trump the court was basically 4-4-1, now it's 6-3 with Roberts occasionally being a swing vote, but not really.
At this point the 6 that are there see fit to use the Constitution to edge the country closer and closer to a theocracy, and of course that's music to many conservative's ears. Both with that school prayer case going 6-3 and Roe v Wade being overturned. The forced-birth argument is just always going to be a religious one, regardless of how feebly some try to hide it. And it's the same with the rulings regarding same sex marriage and yes, even interracial marriage.
What needs to happen is Biden needs to add 2-3 more Justices... hell, barring political reasons I'd say just add 4. Conservatives will cry about it, but they'll cry about anything. Then when the GOP has power they'll do the same thing and it'll be reciprocal. At some point there will be 50 Justices hearing the cases and it might actually make more sense as far as seeking a consensus on important legal matters go. That and maybe both the Democrats and the Republicans will see how the road they got there was stupid but necessary and pass an Amendment giving Justices a 10 year term limit or something. Judicial Review should not be up to 9 people who aren't capable of being held accountable. Just look at Thomas' conflict of interests over the years, he doesn't give a fuck because he's untouchable.
This or solutions even half as bold as this will never happen because Democrats only act when it'll help win them elections. Republicans just don't give a fuck so they do whatever they want.I get the math, my point is more about whether this is a workable system that doesn't result in people just setting the scotus building on fire along with everything else.
So... just tank the scotus until it loops back around to sanity? Why not, I don't have better ideas on this tbh.
Welp, the upside I suppose is that even top donors are being scammed this time around (unless they don't care for abortion I suppose).This or solutions even half as bold as this will never happen because Democrats only act when it'll help win them elections. Republicans just don't give a fuck so they do whatever they want.
They're siphoning money right now off of people due to Roe being overturned.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
What? Literally don't understand what this even means.![]()
peak 2022
What? Literally don't understand what this even means.

--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
--- Double Post Merged, ---