- Joined
- Jul 20, 2016
- Messages
- 3,656
- Reaction score
- 6,861
- Age
- 25
- Gender
- Male
- Country
Again that doesn't make sense though. If the sword was just a conductor then ON wouldn't have been shut off when it melted. Also, when ON is attacked the vortex around Zeldris actually makes a type of explosion, yet for some reason ON just silently disappeared with Mael. Something different happened and Nakaba didn't just draw the sword melting for no reason.uh that's again another refutation of mine earlier "that was merely the activation NOT its mechanics". I can go here and say he needs a conductor to operate ON but in face value he just manipulates darkness around with without the need of his sword.
Stopping ON of saying ON doesnt work deosnt mean deactivated it. Escanor stopped DK's magic by knocking Zel out. That doesn't mean he deactivated it. Also it was shown that the sword plays a role in ON. Again the above paragraph I wrote in this thingsthat's the point?? Escanor literally implied that ON cannot stop his attack which the mechanic of it using high rotational darkness aorund him. Nor it was said he deactivated ON via melting his sword. which u need to explain where he stated that.
1. Calling ON darkness the same as cocoon darkness doesn't make sense. Cocoon darkness is much stronger because it's reinforced by the commandments, making one magically boosted by an outside source in nature and the other physical according to you. As for the whole middle paragraph what? No one cares if the darkness spinning around Zeldris is magical or physical, what we care about is if his darkness got a boost in power- which it pretty much did as Cusack notes that it's basically impossible to walk through the force generated by the spinning of the darkness. If the darkness can make this force then it has this force. He has said nothing about his darkness outside of ON, which is also capable of being blocked by Ludoshel.ON is darkness same as cocoon of darkness. That's your burden of proof to prove your claim. Darkness and is density depends on how powerful the person is and ludo and mael is the prime example dispelling darkness with their power due to their power surpasses that of darkness. oh god. here we go again, darkness cannot be physical attack unless the user initiates the whole idea of transforming something to physical substance. Darkness being used as magic is clearly the best example of meliodas using his demonic power vs galand, estarossa overcomin cruel sun and saying as far as magic goes he has the upper hand in magic, and we have meliodas here who overpowered DKs magic with his darkness. To identify an attack whether its physical or magical u need to analyze whether it has physical substances. Zeldris in this case DID NOT use any special trait except spinning the darkness around him. So prove all of those claims you're claiming with facts rathr than coming at me with headcanon. The user IS WHAT MAKES the darkness different than the other via how powerful they are, ON is merely a technique which he manipulates darkness around him nothing special about that.
No that had nothing to do with the spells Merlin made.... He coated it in darkness because he was getting ready to stand up and fight again. I was just describing the scene to you. I never said he used darkness to cut through merlins spells.So darkness is DKs magic? if so pleae prove it. You're clearly losing to me at this points with this unbacked claims you're making.
Saying how something works doesn't say how much power is put into it... "Explosive power" literally gives nothing to compare to. Escanor's heat varies depending on how much he willingly outputs. Also ON can't stop Mael's attacks because the sword was melted, not because he melted ON. Also no, having stronger magic than someone doesn't make you better than them. Gloxinia had stronger magic than Meliodas, but still lost to him because guess what? Mel was stronger in other areas.Why is aura in this??????? it's about the fucking feat and how it happened and how it was explained. We don't know how much sunshiinee rediates escanor?? oh yeah we do, based off escanor's own explanation the power of the grace itself being too explosive where ON cannot stop mael's attacks. Alright and how does mean anything?? if mael has OVERALL magic power above him his attacks will shit on Escanor with your concession that mael is way superior based off feats by feats. If mael use greatest Sun that's literaly over for him and not only that i already told the other person that escano's base power and mael's base power has a larger gap than galland and escanor mid day which galand who cut tip top of two mountains couldn't cut escanor's arm. So mael here who DISPELLED the true night himself and escanor couldn't overcome AND struggled to put down ON meanwhile we have escanor here who explained it to us that ON cannot stop his attacks whether ON is at defense or offense.
Again, they said ON won't stop Mael's attacks. They never said Mael deactivated it. Zel's magic can't stop Mael's attacks either, does that mean he deactivated the DK's power? No, it means he found a way around it.
You know it's kinda nice how you have to call yourself right in order to feel accomplished in a debate. I sometimes wonder if you're actually 18 or 13. But anyway back to the Escanor thing once again, Escanor does not emit a constant level of heat. He has some control over it. We saw this in vampires of edinburg. He chose to emit more heat after Izraf angered him. Mael does the same thing. Which is why the sword didn't melt during the first part of the fight even though he touched it. He wasn't emitting enough heat originally. The reason we cannot compare Mael's heat and Escanor's heat for this is because we have no idea how much heat both are choosing to emit. We have no standard to draw them too.his sword being melted was drawn, ok. Then what? was there statement on how he deactivated it??? The fact i refuted the whole mechanic of ON before this rebuttal, i don't need to reiterate what i had said.
In order for there to be a contradiction, evidence has to have been there in the first place. You made a claim when there was zero evidence, that's the point.... And if we assume that there was evidence and you just made a contradiction then that just means you're awful at examining this manga. Literally everytime you respond to this specific thing you just bury yourself deeper and it really just punches holes in your argument when you try to sound like you know what you're talking aboutof course i did and how does that refute my point? Not at all the presenting feat shows that until later on. It won't be a headcanon but rather contradiction. you cannot have headcanon and contradiction in the same sentence. Headcanon is like me saying Zeldris own gravitational pull is the same as that of a blackhole, contradicting that via feat where people could resist it and could hold off against it.