Your responde definitely had nothing to do with what I said about the term. What I said had literally nothing to do with deadnaming people.It does. You were complaining about the term being dehumanizing even though it's not.
Your responde definitely had nothing to do with what I said about the term. What I said had literally nothing to do with deadnaming people.It does. You were complaining about the term being dehumanizing even though it's not.
Where's her pepper spray?
You were complaining about the term being dehumanizing. I'm saying it's not in comparison to other stuff.Your responde definitely had nothing to do with what I said about the term. What I said had literally nothing to do with deadnaming people.
And... That's irrelevant. Lots of things are more dehumanizing than the things you mentioned as well.You were complaining about the term being dehumanizing. I'm saying it's not in comparison to other stuff.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Ah, one of our favorite posters from the past here seemed to hold that viewpoint.I've heard this shit a lot. That progressivism is so rampant because when you give up religion you need something else to dogmatically ground your worldview in.
Why can't it be as simple as progressive ideas are more popular than they think?
Exactly, so I don't know why you have an issue with "birth giver" or w/e.And... That's irrelevant. Lots of things are more dehumanizing than the things you mentioned as well.
These idiots don't even know what woke is, but even by their definition of what woke is... what's wrong with being inclusive and respectful of others? Full grown adults acting like this... it's embarrassing.
...and yet these are the same people calling Pope Francis "woke" or calling the Dalai Lama a Hollywood Pedophile
Nevermind that those that would be labeled "woke" are often seen as too tolerant towards certain religious ideologies by conservaboomers like this fuck.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Okay, at this point I'm not sure which of these takes is more wrong.... kind of fascinating
What's crazy is that progressive people can be religious as well.I've heard this shit a lot. That progressivism is so rampant because when you give up religion you need something else to dogmatically ground your worldview in.
Why can't it be as simple as progressive ideas are more popular than they think?
Literally irrelevant.Exactly, so I don't know why you have an issue with "birth giver" or w/e.
The biggest issue I'm seeing right now is how this story is being treated by conservative media. They're acting like these leaks are "good" (I don't necessarily disagree), so the energy used against this kid is wrong since in their eyes many of the same people outraged about this are supporters of Chelsea Manning or Edward Snowden.Both.
The guy is 21. As a 35 year old I can look back and of course think "Wow, I was a big idiot back then!"
OTOH we're old enough to drink, go die in a war, and people at that age could potentially be starting medical or dental school. He should have enough training to know better. Even at companies that aren't involved with the government there are rules for what's confidential, restricted and what's public, and you can still get into trouble releasing stuff you aren't suppose to. He knows damned well what the consequences of his actions could be and is an adult who should be charged as such. When I worked in the DOD we had to check out cell phones in before entering the skiff. We couldn't use the internet even inside. There were no 2-way communication devices allowed. If I accidentally walked in with my cell phone in my pocket I had to report that incident to security.
That said, it's probably time for the Pentagon to rethink how they secure highly classified information. This has happened more than once and under many different pretenses. Not recognizing that the materials were taken is on the Pentagon. This stuff shouldn't be showing up on the news before they know they have a breach.
Well that’s because this kid is white, and Christian.The biggest issue I'm seeing right now is how this story is being treated by conservative media. They're acting like these leaks are "good" (I don't necessarily disagree), so the energy used against this kid is wrong since in their eyes many of the same people outraged about this are supporters of Chelsea Manning or Edward Snowden.
The thing they're missing (or dishonestly leaving out), is this idiot isn't a whistleblower. From all accounts the only reason this leaked was because of some stupid egostroke in a private discord server in order to win an argument.
So the issue isn't necessarily about this kind of disclosure, it's why it happened. And yet you have charlatans like Glenn Greenwald indignantly shouting at "mainstream media" for the outrage over his actions, yet neither he nor Tucker Carlson had the same kind of energy for someone like Reality Winner leaking documents concerning Russian interference in the 2016 election. Wow, wonder why that is...
*and probably a neofascistWell that’s because this kid is white, and Christian.
They’d be singing a different tune if he were anything else. Conservatives in general these days are just too far gone. I mean, have you seen the news of the Texas Governor wanting to pardon Daniel Perry, who was convicted of murder for shooting a BLM protestor dead? Oh, and Perry also had a habit of posting really vulgar, racist stuff and talking about how he wanted to go shoot protestors.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
The worst part is that even if there was some mandatory compliance for not spewing bullshit enforced by the government, no matter what form that takes Fox's viewers would still cheerfully gobble up whatever dogshit the millionaires-wishing-to-be-billionaires put on the air. Hell, they'd probably even more fervently follow Tucker's *implications* of what they should do. Not saying nothing should be done, just piping in with what I anecdotally know from my own lifetime dealing with those people.It's funny how matters such as these are left entirely up to corporate tort law and at no point does the FCC consider intervening to even consider revoking Fox News' broadcast license. These "News" stations get away with broadcasting lies just as long as they call it editorialization or opinion. In fact, the FCC shirks any responsibility to regulate cable in general for some reason I'm not really familiar with.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Oh, sure. And I get that the implications of the FCC regulating more things isn't fun and goes against a lot of what I have usually believed in. Especially when it comes to indecency clauses and the like, but the consequences of letting cable news outlets say whatever the fuck they want as long as they stop short of getting sued (lol not really) has never been more obvious and clear. So idk.The worst part is that even if there was some mandatory compliance for not spewing bullshit enforced by the government, no matter what form that takes Fox's viewers would still cheerfully gobble up whatever dogshit the millionaires-wishing-to-be-billionaires put on the air. Hell, they'd probably even more fervently follow Tucker's *implications* of what they should do. Not saying nothing should be done, just piping in with what I anecdotally know from my own lifetime dealing with those people.
I think the FCC doesn't do shit because that capitalism genie has already been let out of the bottle and it ain't going back in. Grifting reactionary conservatives is an insanely lucrative business.
There's some people who've frequented it that are right-leaning but they don't stick around very long I guess. I'm sure it's just the echo-chamber all of us exist in...Also as a side-note, I'm glad most people are fairly left-leaning here. It'd be disappointing af if I was here for as long as I have been and suddenly pop over here to discover something else.
