Just because they avoided being hit means they are weaker than Luffy? Mohammed Ali dodged a lot of hits from other boxers, so in your opinion he should have went for a straight up brawl? Otherwise he is weaker than others even though he won.
Imagine if it is a game. Cracker fights like a necromancer and Big Mom fights like a warrior+tank. Now you say that Cracker is weak af because he is hiding behind his soldiers and has weak endurance? How else is he supposed to fight. Charge in? This is why what you say makes no sense.
Poor logic.
- Didn't say Cracker was weak, that's a fallacy, I said he was hard to touch and I never said being difficult to touch is a sign of weakness. Huge difference you didn't make distinction of.
Strength is defined by the level of power that can be output.
Weevil is said to have strength comparable to Whitebeard in his youth, it means he's as strong as Whitebeard. Not being able to hit the opponent is a different matter that's irrelevant in terms of strength. That's fighting prowess and/or limitations which is not the argument here.
Mohammad Ali dodging attacks isn't proof he was weak, it only proves he can dodge. However, being the greatest boxer of all time isn't determined by how hard one can hit, but how well one can box as it's a science as is usually stated. George Foreman is easily much more powerful than Ali, doesn't mean he was the better boxer. Try to learn that distinction.
Only thing I really said was Joker and Cracker were opponents whose abilities made them difficult to be reached. Yet, you have to twist that into me claiming they're weak? Pretty misleading and deceptive thing to say.
His goal wasn't to fight Katakuri either, but he did anyway.
Context. It was essential to their escape, so it had to be done. Big Mom wasn't a necessity because of the state she was in and the fact he already had it in mind that she wasn't supposed to be defeated here. You're seemingly not able to distinguish between what's necessary and what isn't.
More so with the fact Luffy had been fatigued due to running around for 49 hours, it's unreasonable to intend to defeat an Emperor as he's not in peak form. Katakuri on the other hand is nowhere as powerful as Big Mom. Even so, if Oda wanted Big Mom defeated here, easily could be done, he's the protagonist.
This is what I said as well. I repeat Oda said he doesn't know how Luffy will defeat Kaido. Furthermore I think Yonko's are equal in power and that is why they are in a stalemate.
You think, but you can't prove.
Oda didn't say the Emperors, he said Kaido specifically.
They're also not equal in physical strength or fight prowess, they're only equal in Military power which is why:
- Blackbeard is increasing military power by acquiring DFs.
- Kaido is acquiring Zoans.
- Big Mom was acquiring Germa or Giants.
Because BM acknowledged his strength made her weaker than Kaido? Kaido called her the old hag, he was acknowledging her strength as well. So according to your logic BM is stronger than Kaido? Right?
Actually, you've made an error here.
Kaido called her an old hag, that's not a sign of acknowledgement or reference to her strength.
In contrast, Big Mom said you'll never be able to beat that thing which is clearly a reference to his strength and more so since she herself has been unable to defeat him as she said, so yes, it implies Big Mom is weaker than Kaido.
There's evidence insinuating Kaido being stronger than Big Mom, not the other way round.
So, it's more of a case of you not understanding the rationale. Being called an Old Hag is in no shape or form a statement that insinuates respecting one's strength. Calling her an Old Hag is simply implying she's an Old Hag to him or someone whom he despises.
Now you are referring outside the context. She said that if Lola married Loki she could have the power to destroy all three of the emperor's and become PK. But that doesn't mean she is weaker than them now. It just means that they are in a stalemate.
She said she'd have been able to defeat Whitebeard who was the strongest Pirate that no one was able to defeat besides Roger, so your point here is moot. A stalemate doesn't necessarily imply equality in terms of individual strength; context.
Your claim suggests she was on par with Whitebeard which is clearly false. The fact that she needed this Army to even defeat Whitebeard suggests she needs them not just to boost her military, but to also give her the chance to defeat Whitebeard too. So, just because she needs to boost her military doesn't mean she's as strong as Kaido, that's a baseless assumption.
When did she state this? I don't remember.
Inability to destroy implies she's unable to do so and more so with the context she makes reference to Kaido himself being a thing. Things do not need be explicitly stated to be true.
It's the same thing man. The author's job is to entertain their audience. With intro Kaido had he had to find a suitable method for Luffy to defeat him.
Irrelevant point. It was specific to Kaido, not to the Emperors. As Oda said, he said when he introduced Kaido, he didn't know how Luffy will beat him in a satisfactory manner because of how he was introduced. Big Mom wasn't introduced like Kaido, so your point is moot. This wasn't said about Big Mom.
The really absurd thing is how you can state what Fujitora said isn't literal. Go ahead and break it down. Apparently, it's metaphorical.
