| Season 2 Episodes | Rating | Likes | Dislikes | Additional Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1: "The Beginning and the End" | /10 | |||
| 2: "Good Whale Hunting | /10 | |||
| 3: "Whisky Business" | /10 | |||
| 4: "Big Trouble in Little Garden" | /10 | |||
| 5: "Wax On, Wax Off" | /10 | |||
| 6: "Nami Deerest" | /10 | |||
| 7: "Reindeer Shames" | /10 | |||
| 8: "Deer and Loathing in Drum Kingdom" | /10 | |||
| Overall rating |
I'm not saying the established fan base of those are anywhere near that of One Piece. The difference is that the majority of their fan base isn't staunchly against the idea of a live action series, with the intent of trying to get it canceled after a season without giving it a chance. OPLA has an uphill battle both in that it's a tougher sell for the average Netflix watcher, but the even tougher ones to win over will be the audience that enabled the original series' success. Sure there is a core who support it, but that only takes you so far when there's a much stronger, louder and more vocal opposition who give potential new fans a bad impression and make sure they don't give it a chance either.
But you are telling me only very little about their vision of it here and I haven't seen anything that makes me think "yeah they definitely got this"
I am not against a live action, but obviously there are factors that make established readers feel unwell, starting from the fact that it is not even finished yet.
Well I don't know what more you want. You can go thorough those sources yourself to get a more detailed picture. It's not my job to write you a synopsis. Besides, what do you actually expect? They don't really go talking about their visions and ideas in public in any TV production until like 2-3 months before release. That over an year from now.
That's strawmanning. I didn't say Jobst was talking about OP specifically, I said that he just shared his philosophy on directing action scenes. You can search that up if you want more on it.
Somebody read a screen writing guide. That's indeed the whole point of a story - who is this guy, why do I care, what is the need, what is the want, how do they proceed to overcome their antagonist. So why would they give this out before release? Their whole job revolves around these to questions - of course they are not going in great detail to spoil it all. The creative process is never 100% open to public. How much does Oda talk about upcoming characters and their functions and arc? That's right, never.
How does this even relate to this topic? You don't like MCU. Okay... millions of people do. And this relates to the fact that this OPLA production fails because? This guy did his bit in the universe, and his episodes were good within what they were done for. But I can correct you a little - Owens wrote episodes. Didn't direct.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
--- Double Post Merged, ---
--- Double Post Merged, ---
Fixed.
Milking it too long? The problem with GoT is that they rushed the ending so much they became incapable of telling anything close to a coherent story. Realistically speaking they could have gone on 5 more seasons. The story will start with luffy wanting to be pirate king and there's a 99.99% chance that we will never see that on the live action series even if its amazing.
So apparently Luffy is going to wear shoes in the series, because stunts would have been too dangerous with sandals..
Stuntmen can also get injured, they have rights for save working conditions as do actors. Besides, it would look stupid if stuntmen had more screen time in action sequences than Inaki.
The purpose of stuntmen is to be unnoticed. Thats their job. Its actually not smart to have your starring cast perform the more dangerous stunts themselves as this can impede or outright end production. Being a stuntman means you are fully aware of the risks of your job. Everyone should have safe working conditions as best as possible, but stunts are never going to be 100% safe and the people who carry them out know.
Luffy's stunt scenes would be way faster than anything James Bond can pull off and all of his legs and probably feet too for realistic physics and proportions would need to be edited for the rubber properties in action scenes anyways.
The Watergate affair was one of the biggest political scandals in American history, with lasting consequences towards the trust in the system.
I don't know about any great sandal scandal. I haven't even ever conciously searched for information about the live action, and any I received, aside from the visually stunning main character cast was to my dismay, its also not what I am looking for with One Piece, I need the Manga and the "behind the Manga".
Luffy does not wear shoes. Changing anything about Luffy is a change in characterisation and Luffy is the lynchpin of this story, so criticism on any change towards the original is justified.
No it goes not. Obviously its part of a stuntmens job to take greater risks than irreplaceable actors. The real question is what stunts are we even talking about, ones that injure your feet or those that can break your neck? Obviously the latter you don't want to account for in any scenario, while the former would halt production if it affects the main cast, but a stunt double? Eh whatever, and that is part of their job and the reason why they exist, and it is a job never free from risk of injury.
Honestly, no point in arguing with you. You've clearly made up your mind about it even before the sandals (or either you are trolling, which is very likely true because you earlier argued that the LA can't be good because a real woman can't be a hugely boobed as Nami). Most of what you write is silly and full of ignorance on the production and making film/tv in the first place. You have zero credentials to criticize anyone's production skills. Also you are not in anyway to preach me about not remembering your use of the internet, since you clearly didn't look up to anything I told you about last time. Anyone saying Matt Owens is a heartless cash grab in this is clearly ignorant and rude and hasn't checked netiher of his appearances in the Reverie. Anyone who thinks the taking care that the actors and stunts don't break their ankles is a sing of poor production is simply wrong. It's good production that cares about the people working in it, and uses the money in smart ways.
What ?
Matt Owens has talked at great length and on many, many occasions about how much the manga and anime means to him, and how it was that Oda "accepted" him as writer and showrunner because of this passion for the manga and specifically because Oda (after a long talk the first time they met) recognized that he truly gets the series. He is also an active part of the One Piece fandom/community, and spent 8 hours just diacussing the series with most of the biggest One Piece YouTubers at the latest Reverie (a long collab stream between OP YTers).
What Orgz said. Already talked about all that to Nuss the last time he decided pre-trash the show without even a poster at that point. You can probably find all that in this thread, or just searching for "Matt Owens Reverie" on google. Understand might sounded weird, but Nuss should already know all this, but he just still chooses to ignore or dismiss. Sandals are more bigger cue on production decisions in his eyes, that how the showrunner talks about the series.